2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Seeds attached to refrigerated shipping containers represent a substantial risk of nonnative plant species introduction and establishment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The initial processes for successful biological invasions are transport, introduction, and establishment. These can be directly influenced or completely avoided through activities that reduce the number and frequency of entering nonnative propagules. Economic and environmental benefits through preventative monitoring programs at early stages of invasion far outweigh the long-term costs associated with mitigating ecological and economic impacts once nonnative species establish and spread. In this study, we identified 30 taxa of hitchhiking plant propagules on the air-intake grilles of refrigerated shipping containers arriving into a United States seaport from a port on the Pacific coast of South America. The four monocotyledonous taxa with the highest number of seeds collected were analyzed; we estimated propagule pressure, germination, and survivorship of these taxa, and we used the estimates to determine likelihood of establishment. At the levels of propagule pressure estimated here, non-zero germination and survival rates resulted in high establishment probabilities even when escape rates from shipping containers were modelled to be exceedingly low. Our results suggest high invasion risk for nonnative taxa including Saccharum spontaneum L., a listed Federal Noxious Weed. Currently, not all shipping containers arriving at USA ports are thoroughly inspected due to limited personnel and funding for biological invasion prevention. Our results indicate that there is a significant risk from only a few propagules escaping into the environment from this source, and we propose possible solutions for reducing this risk.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predicting how altering propagule pressure changes establishment rates of biological invaders across species pools.

          Biological invasions resulting from international trade can cause major environmental and economic impacts. Propagule pressure is perhaps the most important factor influencing establishment, although actual arrival rates of species are rarely recorded. Furthermore, the pool of potential invaders includes many species that vary in their arrival rate and establishment potential. Therefore, we stress that it is essential to consider the size and composition of species pools arriving from source regions when estimating probabilities of establishment and effects of pathway infestation rates. To address this, we developed a novel framework and modeling approach to enable prediction of future establishments in relation to changes in arrival rate across entire species pools. We utilized 13 828 border interception records from the United States and New Zealand for 444 true bark beetle (Scolytinae) and longhorned beetle (Cerambycidae) species detected between 1949 and 2008 as proxies for arrival rates to model the relationship between arrival and establishment rates. Nonlinearity in this relationship implies that measures intended to reduce the unintended transport of potential invaders (such as phytosanitary treatments) must be highly effective in order to substantially reduce the rate of future invasions, particularly if trade volumes continue to increase.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Disease emergence and invasions

            Summary Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are recognized as having significant social, economic and ecological costs, threatening human health, food security, wildlife conservation and biodiversity. We review the processes underlying the emergence of infectious disease, focusing on the similarities and differences between conceptual models of disease emergence and biological invasions in general. Study of the IUCN's list of the world's worst invaders reveals that disease is cited as a driver behind the conservation, medical or economic impact of nearly a quarter of the species on the data base. The emergence of novel diseases in new host species are, in essence, examples of invasions by parasites. Many of the ecological and anthropogenic drivers of disease emergence and classical invasions are also shared, with environmental change and global transport providing opportunities for the introduction and spread of invaders and novel parasites. The phases of disease emergence and biological invasions have many parallels; particularly the early and late phases, where demographic and anthropogenic factors are key drivers. However, there are also differences in the intermediate phases, where host–parasite co‐evolution plays a crucial role in determining parasite establishment in novel hosts. Similar opportunities and constraints on control and management occur at the different phases of invasions and disease emergence. However, exploitation of host immune responses offers additional control opportunities through contact control and vaccination against EIDs. We propose that cross‐fertilization between the disciplines of disease emergence and invasion biology may provide further insights into their prediction, control and management.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Minimum viable population sizes and global extinction risk are unrelated.

              Theoretical and empirical work has shown that once reduced in size and geographical range, species face a considerably elevated risk of extinction. We predict minimum viable population sizes (MVP) for 1198 species based on long-term time-series data and model-averaged population dynamics simulations. The median MVP estimate was 1377 individuals (90% probability of persistence over 100 years) but the overall distribution was wide and strongly positively skewed. Factors commonly cited as correlating with extinction risk failed to predict MVP but were able to predict successfully the probability of World Conservation Union Listing. MVPs were most strongly related to local environmental variation rather than a species' intrinsic ecological and life history attributes. Further, the large variation in MVP across species is unrelated to (or at least dwarfed by) the anthropogenic threats that drive the global biodiversity crisis by causing once-abundant species to decline.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rima.lucardi@usda.gov
                tmarsico@astate.edu
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                14 September 2020
                14 September 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 15017
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.497399.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2106 5338, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, , Southern Research Station, ; Athens, GA USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.252381.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2169 5989, Arkansas Bioscience Institute and Department of Computer Science, , Arkansas State University, ; Jonesboro, AR USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.252381.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2169 5989, Department of Biological Sciences, , Arkansas State University, ; Jonesboro, AR USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.213876.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 738X, Department of Plant Biology, , The Herbarium at the University of Georgia, ; Athens, GA USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.254590.f, ISNI 0000000101729133, Department of Biology, , Columbus State University, ; Columbus, USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.213876.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 738X, Present Address: Department of Plant Pathology, , University of Georgia, ; Athens, GA USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.15276.37, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8091, Present Address: Department of Biology, , University of Florida, ; Gainesville, FL USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.164295.d, ISNI 0000 0001 0941 7177, Present Address: Department of Biology, , University of Maryland, ; College Park, Maryland USA
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8851-2494
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-1466
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3317-0028
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0414-2607
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8422-8314
                Article
                71954
                10.1038/s41598-020-71954-3
                7490705
                32929143
                c93d98c9-4914-4561-b7d4-d5aeaaea8068
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 May 2020
                : 24 August 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: U.S. Forest Service
                Award ID: 15JV11330129032
                Award ID: 15JV11330129031
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Uncategorized
                ecological modelling,invasive species,ecology,plant sciences,plant ecology,environmental impact

                Comments

                Comment on this article