4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Quality of Life During Treatment With Chemohormonal Therapy: Analysis of E3805 Chemohormonal Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial in Prostate Cancer

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d5205831e196"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5205831e197">Purpose</h5> <p id="d5205831e199">Chemohormonal therapy with docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT+D) for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer improves overall survival as compared with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. We compared the quality of life (QOL) between patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer who were treated with ADT+D and those who were treated with ADT alone. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d5205831e201"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5205831e202">Methods</h5> <p id="d5205831e204">Men were randomly assigned to ADT+ D (six cycles) or to ADT alone. QOL was assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), FACT-Taxane, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, and the Brief Pain Inventory at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to examine changes over time. Mixed-effect models compared the QOL between arms at each time point. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d5205831e206"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5205831e207">Results</h5> <p id="d5205831e209">Seven hundred ninety men were randomly assigned (ADT+D [n = 397] and ADT[ n = 393]) and completed FACT-P (90% at baseline, 86% at 3 months, 83% at 6 months, 78% at 9 months, and 77% at 12 months). ADT+D patients reported a statistically significant decline in FACT-P at 3 months ( <i>P</i> &lt; .001) but FACT-P did not differ significantly between baseline and 12 months ( <i>P</i> = .38). ADT+D FACT-P scores were significantly lower at 3 months ( <i>P</i> = .02) but significantly higher at 12 months ( <i>P</i> = .04) when compared with ADT FACT-P scores. Differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference at any time point. ADT+D patients reported significantly lower Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scores at 3 months than did ADT patients ( <i>P</i> &lt; .001). Over time, both arms reported significantly poorer FACT-Taxane scores ( <i>P</i> &lt; .001) when compared with baseline. Brief Pain Inventory scores were similar between arms. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d5205831e230"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5205831e231">Conclusion</h5> <p id="d5205831e233">Although ADT+D was associated with statistically worse QOL at 3 months, QOL was better at 12 months for ADT+D patients than for ADT patients. Both arms reported a similar minimally changed QOL over time, suggesting that ADT+D is not associated with a greater long-term negative impact on QOL. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases.

            This paper reports the development of a self-report instrument designed to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. It is argued that issues of reliability and validity should be considered for every pain questionnaire. Most research on measures of pain examine reliability to the relative neglect of validity concerns. The Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire (BPQ) is evaluated with regard to both reliability and validity. Data from patients with cancer at 4 primary sites and from patients with rheumatoid arthritis suggest that the BPQ is sufficiently reliable and valid for research purposes. Additional methodological and theoretical issues related to validity are discussed, and the need for continuing evaluation of the BPQ and other measures of clinical pain is stressed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association Between Choice of Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy, or Active Surveillance and Patient-Reported Quality of Life Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer

              Importance: Patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer have to decide among treatment strategies that may differ in their likelihood of adverse effects. Objective: To compare quality of life (QOL) after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy vs. active surveillance. Design/Setting/Participants: Population-based prospective cohort of 1,141 men with newly-diagnosed prostate cancer were enrolled from January 2011 through June 2013 in collaboration with the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry (Rapid Case Ascertainment). 57% of eligible men enrolled. Median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 5 weeks, and all men were enrolled with written informed consent prior to treatment. Final follow-up date for current analysis was September 9, 2015. Exposure: Treatment – radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quality of life using the validated instrument Prostate Cancer Symptom Indices was assessed at baseline (pre-treatment), and 3, 12, 24 months after treatment. The instrument contains 4 domains – sexual dysfunction, urinary obstruction and irritation, urinary incontinence, and bowel problems – each scored from 0 (no dysfunction) to 100 (maximum dysfunction). Propensity-weighted mean domain scores were compared between each treatment group vs. active surveillance at each time point. Results: 314 men pursued active surveillance (27.5%), 249 external beam radiotherapy (21.8%), 109 brachytherapy (9.6%), and 469 radical prostatectomy (41.1%). After propensity weighting, median age was 66-67 years across groups, and 77-80% were white. Propensity-weighted baseline sexual dysfunction scores were 41.8-46.4 across groups, urinary obstruction and irritation 20.8-22.8, urinary incontinence 9.7-10.5, and bowel problems 5.7-6.1. Compared to active surveillance, mean sexual dysfunction scores worsened by 3 months for radical prostatectomy (+36.2 points, 95% CI 30.4-42.0), external beam radiotherapy (+13.9, 95% CI 6.7-21.2) and brachytherapy (+17.1, 95% CI 7.8-26.6) patients. Brachytherapy (+20.5 vs. active surveillance, 95% CI 15.1-25.9) and external beam radiotherapy (+11.7, 95% CI 8.7-14.8) were associated with acute worsening of urinary obstruction and irritation, radical prostatectomy (+33.6, 95% CI 27.8-39.2) with urinary incontinence, and external beam radiotherapy (+4.9, 95% CI 2.4-7.4) bowel symptoms. By 24 months, mean scores between treatment groups vs. active surveillance were not significantly different in most domains. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort of men with localized prostate cancer, each treatment strategy was associated with distinct patterns of adverse effects over 2 years. These findings should be used to promote treatment decisions that incorporate individual preferences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                JCO
                American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                April 10 2018
                April 10 2018
                : 36
                : 11
                : 1088-1095
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Alicia K. Morgans, Maha Hussain, and David Cella, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Yu-Hui Chen and Christopher J. Sweeney, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; David F. Jarrard, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI; Elizabeth R. Plimack, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Elizabeth R. Plimack and Benjamin A. Gartrell, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Michael A. Carducci, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Jorge A. Garcia,...
                Article
                10.1200/JCO.2017.75.3335
                5891128
                29522362
                c939d608-6479-425f-86a1-092b6e96668b
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article