9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Habit learning dissociation in rats with lesions to the vermis and the interpositus of the cerebellum.

      Neurobiology of Disease
      Animals, Behavior, Animal, physiology, Cerebellum, injuries, Habits, Learning, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          After cerebellar tumors resection, patients show motor skill learning impairments but also cognitive deficits. However, their exact origins remain controversial. Using a rat model of cerebellar injury, we assessed the involvement of two structures often damaged during resection (vermis and interpositus nuclei) on habits development. During extended training of an instrumental task, rats develop response routines that are no longer voluntary or goal-directed but habit-based, evidenced by their insensitivity to changes in the value of the reward. Here we showed that, in contrast to sham or vermis lesioned rats, discrete lesions to interpositus nuclei prevented rats from developing habits with overtraining, without motor difficulties, nor alteration of the instrumental task acquisition. Our results suggest that the role of the cerebellum can be extended from motor skill learning to cognitive routines learning. Similar habit impairment could possibly account for some of the long-term outcome difficulties observed in cerebellar-damaged patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          17560113
          10.1016/j.nbd.2007.04.007

          Chemistry
          Animals,Behavior, Animal,physiology,Cerebellum,injuries,Habits,Learning,Male,Psychomotor Performance,Rats,Rats, Sprague-Dawley

          Comments

          Comment on this article