Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Netizens’ Food Safety Knowledge, Attitude, Behaviors, and Demand for Science Popularization by WeMedia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aimed to investigate netizens’ food safety knowledge, attitudes and behavior, status, and their demand for science popularization by WeMedia. Firstly, participants were recruited by WeMedia, including WeChat, Microblog, and QQ. Then, a web-based survey was conducted using a self-designed questionnaire, which comprised 29 items about the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) status of netizens’ food safety and the demand for science popularization by WeMedia. A correct answer on knowledge-related items was assigned a value of 1 point, and the high, medium, and low levels of knowledge had a total of 6–8, 3–5, and 0–2 points, respectively. A correct answer on attitude-related items was given a value of 1 to 5 points, and the high, medium, and low levels of attitude had a total of 16–20, 8–16, and l4–8 points, respectively. A correct answer on practice-related items was given a value of 5 to 1 point, and the high, medium, and low levels of attitude had a total of 22–30, 14–22, and 6–14 points, respectively. Results showed that the distribution of the different levels of the KAP scores were as follows: high (79.0%), medium (20.2%), low (0.8%); high (65.6%), medium (34.1%), low (0.3%); high (70.1%), medium (29.4%), low (0.5%). Approximately 86% of the subjects desired to obtain food safety knowledge from WeMedia. In conclusion, the netizens’ KAP in food safety are relatively optimistic. A large demand for science popularization on food safety knowledge by WeMedia is warranted. The WeMedia has a potentially important role in science popularization and health promotion related to food safety and health behaviors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Uses and gratifications of social media: a comparison of microblog and WeChat

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Understanding China's food safety problem: An analysis of 2387 incidents of acute foodborne illness

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Self-reported food safety knowledge and practices of Lebanese food handlers in Lebanese households

              The purpose of this paper is to assess level of food safety knowledge and self-reported practices among Lebanese food handlers in Lebanese households and to identify the association between knowledge/practices and socio-demographic characteristics. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,500 participants from different gender, age, area of residence, income, marital status and education. They completed a questionnaire of six questions about demographics, and 26 questions related to knowledge and self-reported practices in terms of food handling, storage, usage of kitchen facilities and personal hygiene subgroups. SPSS v23 was used for statistical analyses. Student t -test and analysis of variance were conducted. Significance level of 0.05 was used. On average, participants scored 55.6±16.3, 51.3±25.7, 67.4±19.3 and 89.1±16.3 on food handling, storage, usage of kitchen facilities and personal hygiene, respectively, whereas the passing (score above 50 percent) rates were 64.5, 69.9, 90.5 and 99.1, respectively, for the different subgroups. Gender had significant ( p <0.05) effect on food handling and personal hygiene; age, marital status and education had significant ( p <0.05) effect on handling, usage of kitchen facilities and personal hygiene; area of residence had significant ( p <0.05) effect on storage, handling and usage of kitchen facilities; income had significant ( p <0.05) effect on handling and usage of kitchen facilities. Overall mean food safety knowledge and self-reported practices score was 63.8±12.6; passing rate was 86.2; gender, age, area of residence, education, marital status and income had significant ( p <0.05) effect. Food safety self-reported practices and knowledge scores were significantly ( p <0.001) related to a weak to moderate correlation coefficient ( R =0.34). The results confirm the need for ongoing educational initiatives to improve the relatively low food safety knowledge and practices among the Lebanese food handlers in Lebanese households. No study has determined the food safety knowledge and self-reported practices of Lebanese food handlers in Lebanese households before.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                23 January 2020
                February 2020
                : 17
                : 3
                : 730
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Public Health and Management/Research Center for Medicine and Social Development/Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China; zhaoyong@ 123456cqmu.edu.cn (Y.Z.); aipiaodenvhai@ 123456163.com (X.Y.); 369xyx@ 123456sina.com (Y.X.); 2018111015@ 123456stu.cqmu.edu.cn (Z.C.); luoxinmiao215@ 123456163.com (X.L.)
                [2 ]Research Center for Medicine and Social Development, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
                [3 ]The Innovation Center for Social Risk Governance in Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
                [4 ]Chongqing Key Laboratory of Child Nutrition and Health, Chongqing 400016, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: zhangfan@ 123456cqmu.edu.cn
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9290-109X
                Article
                ijerph-17-00730
                10.3390/ijerph17030730
                7038187
                31979258
                c8f2f190-409d-4f0a-8014-dc50a235984b
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 November 2019
                : 21 January 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                netizen,food safety,knowledge,attitude,behaviors,wemedia
                Public health
                netizen, food safety, knowledge, attitude, behaviors, wemedia

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content55

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors111