6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Blood donor exposome and impact of common drugs on red blood cell metabolism

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Computational models based on recent maps of the RBC proteome suggest that mature erythrocytes may harbor targets for common drugs. This prediction is relevant to RBC storage in the blood bank, in which the impact of small molecule drugs or other xenometabolites deriving from dietary, iatrogenic, or environmental exposures (“exposome”) may alter erythrocyte energy and redox metabolism and, in so doing, affect red cell storage quality and posttransfusion efficacy. To test this prediction, here we provide a comprehensive characterization of the blood donor exposome, including the detection of common prescription and over-the-counter drugs in blood units donated by 250 healthy volunteers in the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study III Red Blood Cell–Omics (REDS-III RBC-Omics) Study. Based on high-throughput drug screenings of 1366 FDA-approved drugs, we report that approximately 65% of the tested drugs had an impact on erythrocyte metabolism. Machine learning models built using metabolites as predictors were able to accurately predict drugs for several drug classes/targets (bisphosphonates, anticholinergics, calcium channel blockers, adrenergics, proton pump inhibitors, antimetabolites, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and mTOR), suggesting that these drugs have a direct, conserved, and substantial impact on erythrocyte metabolism. As a proof of principle, here we show that the antacid ranitidine — though rarely detected in the blood donor population — has a strong effect on RBC markers of storage quality in vitro. We thus show that supplementation of blood units stored in bags with ranitidine could — through mechanisms involving sphingosine 1–phosphate–dependent modulation of erythrocyte glycolysis and/or direct binding to hemoglobin — improve erythrocyte metabolism and storage quality.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An estimation of the number of cells in the human body.

          All living organisms are made of individual and identifiable cells, whose number, together with their size and type, ultimately defines the structure and functions of an organism. While the total cell number of lower organisms is often known, it has not yet been defined in higher organisms. In particular, the reported total cell number of a human being ranges between 10(12) and 10(16) and it is widely mentioned without a proper reference.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Red blood cell storage lesion: causes and potential clinical consequences

            Red blood cells (RBCs) are a specialised organ that enabled the evolution of multicellular organisms by supplying a sufficient quantity of oxygen to cells that cannot obtain oxygen directly from ambient air via diffusion, thereby fueling oxidative phosphorylation for highly efficient energy production. RBCs have evolved to optimally serve this purpose by packing high concentrations of haemoglobin in their cytosol and shedding nuclei and other organelles. During their circulatory lifetimes in humans of approximately 120 days, RBCs are poised to transport oxygen by metabolic/redox enzymes until they accumulate damage and are promptly removed by the reticuloendothelial system. These elaborate evolutionary adaptions, however, are no longer effective when RBCs are removed from the circulation and stored hypothermically in blood banks, where they develop storage-induced damages (“storage lesions”) that accumulate over the shelf life of stored RBCs. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive view of the literature on the subject of RBC storage lesions and their purported clinical consequences by incorporating the recent exponential growth in available data obtained from “omics” technologies in addition to that published in more traditional literature. To summarise this vast amount of information, the subject is organised in figures with four panels: i) root causes; ii) RBC storage lesions; iii) physiological effects; and iv) reported outcomes. The driving forces for the development of the storage lesions can be roughly classified into two root causes: i) metabolite accumulation/depletion, the target of various interventions (additive solutions) developed since the inception of blood banking; and ii) oxidative damages, which have been reported for decades but not addressed systemically until recently. Downstream physiological consequences of these storage lesions, derived mainly by in vitro studies, are described, and further potential links to clinical consequences are discussed. Interventions to postpone the onset and mitigate the extent of the storage lesion development are briefly reviewed. In addition, we briefly discuss the results from recent randomised controlled trials on the age of stored blood and clinical outcomes of transfusion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tenofovir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir diphosphate in dried blood spots for determining recent and cumulative drug exposure.

              Tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil fumarate (TDF)±emtricitabine (FTC) are widely used for HIV treatment and chemoprophylaxis, but variable adherence may lead to suboptimal responses. Methods that quantify adherence would allow for interventions to improve treatment and prevention outcomes. Our objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) and FTC-triphosphate (FTC-TP) in red blood cells (RBCs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs); to extend the RBC analysis to dried blood spots (DBSs); and to model how RBC/DBS monitoring could inform recent and cumulative drug exposure/adherence. Blood samples were collected from 17 HIV-negative adults at 5 visits over a 30-day pharmacokinetics study of daily oral TDF/FTC. Dosing was discontinued on day 30 and blood was collected on days 35, 45, and 60 during the washout period. Plasma/RBCs/PBMCs/DBSs were all quantified by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. DBSs were paired with RBCs and plasma for comparisons. The median (interquartile range) RBC TFV-DP half-life was 17.1 (15.7-20.2) versus 4.2 (3.7-5.2) days in PBMCs. At steady state, TFV-DP was 130 fmol/10(6) RBCs versus 98 fmol/10(6) PBMCs. FTC-TP was not quantifiable in most RBC samples. TFV-DP in RBCs versus DBSs yielded an r(2)=0.83. TFV-DP in DBSs was stable at -20°C. Simulations of TFV-DP in RBCs/DBSs, when dosed from one to seven times per week, demonstrated that each dose per week resulted in an average change of approximately 19 fmol/10(6) RBCs and 230 fmol/punch. TFV and FTC in plasma versus DBSs was defined by y=1.4x; r(2)=0.96 and y=0.8x; r(2)=0.99, respectively. We conclude that DBSs offer a convenient measure of recent (TFV/FTC) and cumulative (TFV-DP in RBCs) drug exposure with potential application to adherence monitoring.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JCI Insight
                JCI Insight
                JCI Insight
                JCI Insight
                American Society for Clinical Investigation
                2379-3708
                8 February 2021
                8 February 2021
                8 February 2021
                : 6
                : 3
                : e146175
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver — Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
                [2 ]Omix Technologies Inc., Aurora, Colorado, USA.
                [3 ]Sinopia Biosciences Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
                [4 ]University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
                [5 ]Vitalant Research Institute, Denver, Colorado, USA.
                [6 ]University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
                [7 ]University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
                [8 ]University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
                [9 ]Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
                [10 ]The REDS-III RBC–Omics Study is detailed in Supplemental Acknowledgments.
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Angelo D’Alessandro, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA. Phone: 303.724.0096; Email: angelo.dalessandro@ 123456ucdenver.edu .

                Authorship note: TN and DS are co–first authors and contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-7119
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-6788
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-5098
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-6785
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1715-0748
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5054-838X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2258-6490
                Article
                146175
                10.1172/jci.insight.146175
                7934844
                33351786
                c8c6f2fe-369b-434a-b558-6f92e0c3f2fd
                © 2021 Nemkov et al.

                This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 November 2020
                : 18 December 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: NHLBI
                Award ID: HHSN2682011-00001I,R01HL146442,R01HL149714,R01HL148151,R21HL150032
                Funded by: NIGMS
                Award ID: RM1GM131968
                Categories
                Research Article

                hematology,metabolism,drug screens
                hematology, metabolism, drug screens

                Comments

                Comment on this article