20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Possible Association of Periodontal Diseases With Helicobacter pylori Gastric Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Some research has suggested that dental plaque and saliva could be reservoirs of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori) and be capable of infecting or re-infecting the gastric mucosa after eradication, with certain studies showing a significant association between PD and gastric infection by this bacterium. An electronic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases with the terms “ Helicobacter pylori AND periodontal diseases”; “ Helicobacter pylori AND gingivitis”; “ Helicobacter pylori AND chronic periodontitis”; “ Helicobacter pylori AND periodontitis”; “ Helicobacter pylori AND dental plaque”, to identify articles up to September 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess study quality. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 2020 (Cochane Collaboration) software. A total of 1,315 studies were identified and 12 were included, analyzing 226,086 patients with mean age between 10.5 and 63.4 years. The prevalence of H. pylori in the oral cavity ranged from 5.4 to 83.3%. A random-effects model was used to analyze the presence of H. pylori and subgroups were made according to the method of evaluation (PCR or RUT). Statistical significance was found in the overall analysis ( p = 0.01). There is no clear evidence that H. pylori present in oral bacterial plaque causes gastric infection and vice versa.

          Systematic Review Registration

          www.INPLASY.COM, identifier: INPLASY2021100097.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

            The extent of heterogeneity in a meta-analysis partly determines the difficulty in drawing overall conclusions. This extent may be measured by estimating a between-study variance, but interpretation is then specific to a particular treatment effect metric. A test for the existence of heterogeneity exists, but depends on the number of studies in the meta-analysis. We develop measures of the impact of heterogeneity on a meta-analysis, from mathematical criteria, that are independent of the number of studies and the treatment effect metric. We derive and propose three suitable statistics: H is the square root of the chi2 heterogeneity statistic divided by its degrees of freedom; R is the ratio of the standard error of the underlying mean from a random effects meta-analysis to the standard error of a fixed effect meta-analytic estimate, and I2 is a transformation of (H) that describes the proportion of total variation in study estimates that is due to heterogeneity. We discuss interpretation, interval estimates and other properties of these measures and examine them in five example data sets showing different amounts of heterogeneity. We conclude that H and I2, which can usually be calculated for published meta-analyses, are particularly useful summaries of the impact of heterogeneity. One or both should be presented in published meta-analyses in preference to the test for heterogeneity. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front. Med.
                Frontiers in Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-858X
                19 April 2022
                2022
                : 9
                : 822194
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Surgery, University of Salamanca , Salamanca, Spain
                [2] 2Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL) , Salamanca, Spain
                [3] 3Institute for Occlusion and Orofacial Pain Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra , Coimbra, Portugal
                [4] 4Department of Preclinical Dentistry, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid , Madrid, Spain
                [5] 5Department of Dentistry, Universidad Federico Henríquez y Carvajal , Santo Domingo, Dominican
                [6] 6Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio , Madrid, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Yi Hu, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China

                Reviewed by: Rinaldo Pellicano, Molinette Hospital, Italy; Shymaa Enany, Suez Canal University, Egypt; Silvia-Giono Cerezo, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico; Frederico Lages, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil; Amirhooshang Alvandi, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran

                *Correspondence: Ana Suárez ana.suarez@ 123456universidadeuropea.es

                This article was submitted to Infectious Diseases - Surveillance, Prevention and Treatment, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine

                Article
                10.3389/fmed.2022.822194
                9063465
                35514745
                c873202e-4869-4704-af4a-6185f4c8a7bb
                Copyright © 2022 López-Valverde, Macedo de Sousa, López-Valverde, Suárez, Rodríguez and Aragoneses.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 November 2021
                : 14 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 65, Pages: 9, Words: 5903
                Categories
                Medicine
                Systematic Review

                helicobacter pylori,dental plaque,periodontal diseases,gastric infection,saliva

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content709

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors1,500