1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiparametric MRI and auto-fixed volume of interest-based radiomics signature for clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To create a radiomics approach based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) features extracted from an auto-fixed volume of interest (VOI) that quantifies the phenotype of clinically significant (CS) peripheral zone (PZ) prostate cancer (PCa).

          Methods

          This study included 206 patients with 262 prospectively called mpMRI prostate imaging reporting and data system 3–5 PZ lesions. Gleason scores > 6 were defined as CS PCa. Features were extracted with an auto-fixed 12-mm spherical VOI placed around a pin point in each lesion. The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging(DCE), multivariate feature selection and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) vs. univariate feature selection and random forest (RF), expert-based feature pre-selection, and the addition of image filters was investigated using the training (171 lesions) and test (91 lesions) datasets.

          Results

          The best model with features from T2-weighted (T2-w) + diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) + DCE had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.870 (95% CI 0.980–0.754). Removal of DCE features decreased AUC to 0.816 (95% CI 0.920–0.710), although not significantly ( p = 0.119). Multivariate and XGB outperformed univariate and RF ( p = 0.028). Expert-based feature pre-selection and image filters had no significant contribution.

          Conclusions

          The phenotype of CS PZ PCa lesions can be quantified using a radiomics approach based on features extracted from T2-w + DWI using an auto-fixed VOI. Although DCE features improve diagnostic performance, this is not statistically significant. Multivariate feature selection and XGB should be preferred over univariate feature selection and RF. The developed model may be a valuable addition to traditional visual assessment in diagnosing CS PZ PCa.

          Key Points

          • T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging features are essential components of a radiomics model for clinically significant prostate cancer; addition of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging does not significantly improve diagnostic performance.

          • Multivariate feature selection and extreme gradient outperform univariate feature selection and random forest.

          • The developed radiomics model that extracts multiparametric MRI features with an auto-fixed volume of interest may be a valuable addition to visual assessment in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06488-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers

          Radiomics extracts and mines large number of medical imaging features quantifying tumor phenotypic characteristics. Highly accurate and reliable machine-learning approaches can drive the success of radiomic applications in clinical care. In this radiomic study, fourteen feature selection methods and twelve classification methods were examined in terms of their performance and stability for predicting overall survival. A total of 440 radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images of 464 lung cancer patients. To ensure the unbiased evaluation of different machine-learning methods, publicly available implementations along with reported parameter configurations were used. Furthermore, we used two independent radiomic cohorts for training (n = 310 patients) and validation (n = 154 patients). We identified that Wilcoxon test based feature selection method WLCX (stability = 0.84 ± 0.05, AUC = 0.65 ± 0.02) and a classification method random forest RF (RSD = 3.52%, AUC = 0.66 ± 0.03) had highest prognostic performance with high stability against data perturbation. Our variability analysis indicated that the choice of classification method is the most dominant source of performance variation (34.21% of total variance). Identification of optimal machine-learning methods for radiomic applications is a crucial step towards stable and clinically relevant radiomic biomarkers, providing a non-invasive way of quantifying and monitoring tumor-phenotypic characteristics in clinical practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Radiomics and radiogenomics in lung cancer: A review for the clinician.

            Lung cancer is responsible for a large proportion of cancer-related deaths across the globe, with delayed detection being perhaps the most significant factor for its high mortality rate. Though the National Lung Screening Trial argues for screening of certain at-risk populations, the practical implementation of these screening efforts has not yet been successful and remains in high demand. Radiomics refers to the computerized extraction of data from radiologic images, and provides unique potential for making lung cancer screening more rapid and accurate using machine learning algorithms. The quantitative features analyzed express subvisual characteristics of images which correlate with pathogenesis of diseases. These features are broadly classified into four categories: intensity, structure, texture/gradient, and wavelet, based on the types of image attributes they capture. Many studies have been done to show correlation between these features and the malignant potential of a nodule on a chest CT. In cancer patients, these nodules also have features that can be correlated with prognosis and mutation status. The major limitations of radiomics are the lack of standardization of acquisition parameters, inconsistent radiomic methods, and lack of reproducibility. Researchers are working on overcoming these limitations, which would make radiomics more acceptable in the medical community.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Individual comparisons of grouped data by ranking methods.

              F WILCOXON (1946)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                j.bleker@umcg.nl
                Journal
                Eur Radiol
                Eur Radiol
                European Radiology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0938-7994
                1432-1084
                27 November 2019
                27 November 2019
                2020
                : 30
                : 3
                : 1313-1324
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4830.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0407 1981, Medical Imaging Center, Departments of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, , University of Groningen, ; Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.4830.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0407 1981, Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, , University of Groningen, ; Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
                [3 ]GRID grid.10417.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, , Radboud University Medical Center, ; Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4703-1368
                Article
                6488
                10.1007/s00330-019-06488-y
                7033141
                31776744
                c79fbd4a-1a28-4a27-ba32-9a9738b96163
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 5 July 2019
                : 28 August 2019
                : 9 October 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG)
                Categories
                Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence
                Custom metadata
                © European Society of Radiology 2020

                Radiology & Imaging
                machine learning,magnetic resonance imaging,prostatic neoplasms,neoplasm grading

                Comments

                Comment on this article