Processing math: 100%
Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

         An official journal of the Society for Reproduction and Fertility. Learn more

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Resurrecting biodiversity: advanced assisted reproductive technologies and biobanking

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Biodiversity is defined as the presence of a variety of living organisms on the Earth that is essential for human survival. However, anthropogenic activities are causing the sixth mass extinction, threatening even our own species. For many animals, dwindling numbers are becoming fragmented populations with low genetic diversity, threatening long-term species viability. With extinction rates 1000–10,000 times greater than natural, ex situ and in situ conservation programmes need additional support to save species. The indefinite storage of cryopreserved (−196°C) viable cells and tissues (cryobanking), followed by assisted or advanced assisted reproductive technology (ART: utilisation of oocytes and spermatozoa to generate offspring; aART: utilisation of somatic cell genetic material to generate offspring), may be the only hope for species’ long-term survival. As such, cryobanking should be considered a necessity for all future conservation strategies. Following cryopreservation, ART/aART can be used to reinstate lost genetics back into a population, resurrecting biodiversity. However, for this to be successful, species-specific protocol optimisation and increased knowledge of basic biology for many taxa are required. Current ART/aART is primarily focused on mammalian taxa; however, this needs to be extended to all, including to some of the most endangered species: amphibians. Gamete, reproductive tissue and somatic cell cryobanking can fill the gap between losing genetic diversity today and future technological developments. This review explores species prioritisation for cryobanking and the successes and challenges of cryopreservation and multiple ARTs/aARTs. We here discuss the value of cryobanking before more species are lost and the potential of advanced reproductive technologies not only to halt but also to reverse biodiversity loss.

          Lay summary

          The world is undergoing its sixth mass extinction; however, unlike previous events, the latest is caused by human activities and is resulting in the largest loss of biodiversity (all living things on Earth) for 65 million years. With an extinction rate 1000–10,000-fold greater than natural, this catastrophic decline in biodiversity is threatening our own survival. As the number of individuals within a species declines, genetic diversity reduces, threatening their long-term existence. In this review, the authors summarise approaches to indefinitely preserve living cells and tissues at low temperatures (cryobanking) and the technologies required to resurrect biodiversity. In the future when appropriate techniques become available, these living samples can be thawed and used to reinstate genetic diversity and produce live young ones of endangered species, enabling their long-term survival. The successes and challenges of genome resource cryopreservation are discussed to enable a move towards a future of stable biodiversity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references307

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors.

          Differentiated cells can be reprogrammed to an embryonic-like state by transfer of nuclear contents into oocytes or by fusion with embryonic stem (ES) cells. Little is known about factors that induce this reprogramming. Here, we demonstrate induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic or adult fibroblasts by introducing four factors, Oct3/4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4, under ES cell culture conditions. Unexpectedly, Nanog was dispensable. These cells, which we designated iPS (induced pluripotent stem) cells, exhibit the morphology and growth properties of ES cells and express ES cell marker genes. Subcutaneous transplantation of iPS cells into nude mice resulted in tumors containing a variety of tissues from all three germ layers. Following injection into blastocysts, iPS cells contributed to mouse embryonic development. These data demonstrate that pluripotent stem cells can be directly generated from fibroblast cultures by the addition of only a few defined factors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.

            The advent of facile genome engineering using the bacterial RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas9 system in animals and plants is transforming biology. We review the history of CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat) biology from its initial discovery through the elucidation of the CRISPR-Cas9 enzyme mechanism, which has set the stage for remarkable developments using this technology to modify, regulate, or mark genomic loci in a wide variety of cells and organisms from all three domains of life. These results highlight a new era in which genomic manipulation is no longer a bottleneck to experiments, paving the way toward fundamental discoveries in biology, with applications in all branches of biotechnology, as well as strategies for human therapeutics. Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Exosomes: biogenesis, biologic function and clinical potential

              Exosomes are nano-sized biovesicles released into surrounding body fluids upon fusion of multivesicular bodies and the plasma membrane. They were shown to carry cell-specific cargos of proteins, lipids, and genetic materials, and can be selectively taken up by neighboring or distant cells far from their release, reprogramming the recipient cells upon their bioactive compounds. Therefore, the regulated formation of exosomes, specific makeup of their cargo, cell-targeting specificity are of immense biological interest considering extremely high potential of exosomes as non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers, as well as therapeutic nanocarriers. In present review, we outline and discuss recent progress in the elucidation of the regulatory mechanisms of exosome biogenesis, the molecular composition of exosomes, and technologies used in exosome research. Furthermore, we focus on the potential use of exosomes as valuable diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for their cell-lineage and state-specific contents, and possibilities as therapeutic vehicles for drug and gene delivery. Exosome research is now in its infancy, in-depth understanding of subcellular components and mechanisms involved in exosome formation and specific cell-targeting will bring light on their physiological activities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Reprod Fertil
                Reprod Fertil
                raf
                Reproduction & Fertility
                Bioscientifica Ltd (Bristol )
                2633-8386
                30 June 2022
                01 July 2022
                : 3
                : 3
                : R121-R146
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Nature’s SAFE , Chapel Field Stud, Ash Lane, Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK
                [2 ]Dublin Zoo , Phoenix Park, Dublin 8, Ireland
                [3 ]IMT International Limited , Tattenhall, Chester, UK
                [4 ]Gemini Genetics , Chapel Field Stud, Ash Lane, Whitchurch, UK
                [5 ]Chester Zoo , Upton-by-Chester, UK
                [6 ]Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health , University of Oxford, Women’s Centre, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
                [7 ]South-East Zoo Alliance for Reproduction & Conservation , Yulee, Florida, USA
                [8 ]Copenhagen Zoo , Frederiksberg, Denmark
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to R L Bolton: rhiannon@ 123456natures-safe.com

                This paper forms part of a special series on Fertility Preservation. The guest editors for this series was Rod Mitchell (University of Edinburgh) and the Series Associate Editor was Suzannah Williams (University of Oxford).

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-8896
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-0327
                Article
                RAF-22-0005
                10.1530/RAF-22-0005
                9346332
                35928671
                c78267b4-3980-4808-b595-313ca6138f1a
                © The authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 22 June 2022
                : 30 June 2022
                Categories
                Review

                biobanking,cryopreservation,biodiversity,assisted reproductive technology,conservation

                Comments

                Comment on this article