8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Consensus review on peri-implant femur fracture treatment: Peri-Implant Spanish Consensus (PISCO) investigators’ recommendations

      review-article
      1 , 2 , , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 5 , 1 , 2 , the PISCO Investigators
      (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab)
      EFORT Open Reviews
      Bioscientifica Ltd
      femur, peri-implant fractures, hip fracture, consensus

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          • A peri-implant femoral fracture (PIFF) is defined as a femoral fracture in the presence of a pre-existing non-prosthetic implant. Classification systems, treatment guidelines and fixation strategies exist for peri-prosthetic fractures, but there is no standard of care regarding PIFFs.

          • The aim of the Peri-Implant Spanish Consensus (aka PISCO) investigators is to reach an agreement regarding current practices for management of PIFFs and to propose four main principles to assess surgical treatment and prevention of these fractures.

          • This consensus review was conducted according to the Delphi method. Twenty-two expert orthopaedic trauma surgeons performed the consensus and the definitive statements were approved unanimously.

          • Biological fixation principles must be utilized in the surgical treatment of peri-implant femur fractures, which include closed or minimally invasive reduction techniques. The osteosynthesis must protect the entire bone.

          • Gaps between two implants should be avoided. If implant overlap is not possible to achieve, then spanning inter-implant fixation systems must be used, especially in osteoporotic bone.

          • Previous implants should be retained during surgical treatment of peri-implant femur fractures. Only those implants that would interfere with current fixation goals should be removed.

          • If the previous implant is in the femoral neck region, then femoral neck protection must be maintained when treating the peri-implant fracture, even if the neck fracture has already healed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

          Louis Pasteur once said that: "Fortune favours the prepared mind." As one of the great scientists who contributed to the fight against infection, he emphasised the importance of being prepared at all times to recognise infection and deal with it. Despite the many scientific discoveries and technological advances, such as the advent of antibiotics and the use of sterile techniques, infection continues to be a problem that haunts orthopaedic surgeons and inflicts suffering on patients. The medical community has implemented many practices with the intention of preventing infection and treating it effectively when it occurs. Although high-level evidence may support some of these practices, many are based on little to no scientific foundation. Thus, around the world, there is great variation in practices for the prevention and management of periprosthetic joint infection. This paper summaries the instigation, conduct and findings of a recent International Consensus Meeting on Surgical Site and Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Delphi technique in health sciences education research.

            The Delphi technique is a method of collecting opinion on a particular research question. It is based on the premise that pooled intelligence enhances individual judgement and captures the collective opinion of a group of experts without being physically assembled. The conventional Delphi uses a series of questionnaires to generate expert opinion in an anonymous fashion and takes place over a series of rounds. The technique is becoming a popular strategy that straddles both quantitative and qualitative realms. Issues that are critical to its validity are the development of the questionnaire; definition of consensus and how to interpret non-consensus; criteria for and selection of the expert panel; sample size; and data analysis. The authors used the Delphi technique to assist with making recommendations regarding education and training for medical practitioners working in district hospitals in South Africa. The objective of this Delphi was to obtain consensus opinion on content and methods relating to the maintenance of competence of these doctors. They believe the experience gained from their work may be useful for other health science education researchers wishing to use the Delphi method.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EFORT Open Rev
                EFORT Open Rev
                eor
                EFORT Open Reviews
                Bioscientifica Ltd (Bristol )
                2058-5241
                09 January 2024
                01 January 2024
                : 9
                : 1
                : 40-50
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery , Hospital, Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
                [2 ]Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) , Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ]Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery , Hospital Althaia Manresa. Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
                [4 ]Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery , Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, Andorra
                [5 ]Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery , Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid. Valladolid, Spain
                [6 ]Universidad de Valladolid , Valladolid, Spain
                [7 ]Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery , Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to P Castillón; Email: pablocastillon@ 123456mutuaterrassa.es

                (The list of PISCO investigators is presented in the Acknowledgements section)

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2348-0863
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-180X
                Article
                EOR-23-0105
                10.1530/EOR-23-0105
                10823565
                c7401653-9d2c-4762-809c-5f6984ab11f3
                © the author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                Categories
                Hip
                hip, Hip
                Femur
                Peri-Implant Fractures
                Hip Fracture
                Consensus
                Custom metadata
                hip

                femur,peri-implant fractures,hip fracture,consensus
                femur, peri-implant fractures, hip fracture, consensus

                Comments

                Comment on this article