22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Building social cohesion between Christians and Muslims through soccer in post-ISIS Iraq

      1
      Science
      American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Can intergroup contact build social cohesion after war? I randomly assigned Iraqi Christians displaced by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) to an all-Christian soccer team or to a team mixed with Muslims. The intervention improved behaviors toward Muslim peers: Christians with Muslim teammates were more likely to vote for a Muslim (not on their team) to receive a sportsmanship award, register for a mixed team next season, and train with Muslims 6 months after the intervention. The intervention did not substantially affect behaviors in other social contexts, such as patronizing a restaurant in Muslim-dominated Mosul or attending a mixed social event, nor did it yield consistent effects on intergroup attitudes. Although contact can build tolerant behaviors toward peers within an intervention, building broader social cohesion outside of it is more challenging.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Recent advances in intergroup contact theory

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Social Capital And Community Governance*

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              The contact hypothesis re-evaluated

              This paper evaluates the state of contact hypothesis research from a policy perspective. Building on Pettigrew and Tropp's (2006) influential meta-analysis, we assemble all intergroup contact studies that feature random assignment and delayed outcome measures, of which there are 27 in total, nearly two-thirds of which were published following the original review. We find the evidence from this updated dataset to be consistent with Pettigrew and Tropp's (2006) conclusion that contact “typically reduces prejudice.” At the same time, our meta-analysis suggests that contact's effects vary, with interventions directed at ethnic or racial prejudice generating substantially weaker effects. Moreover, our inventory of relevant studies reveals important gaps, most notably the absence of studies addressing adults' racial or ethnic prejudices, an important limitation for both theory and policy. We also call attention to the lack of research that systematically investigates the scope conditions suggested by Allport (1954) under which contact is most influential. We conclude that these gaps in contact research must be addressed empirically before this hypothesis can reliably guide policy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Science
                Science
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                August 13 2020
                August 14 2020
                August 13 2020
                August 14 2020
                : 369
                : 6505
                : 866-870
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
                Article
                10.1126/science.abb3153
                32792403
                c6d1c8ba-0e79-4de4-8ced-4f5f7c843170
                © 2020

                https://www.sciencemag.org/about/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article