2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The effects of body mass index (BMI) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes such as ovarian dysfunction, poor ovum quality, and endometrial dysfunction have been studied; however, many aspects remain controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between BMI and ART outcomes. For 14,605 oocyte retrieval cycles at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020, BMI was divided into five groups (< 18.5, 18.5–20.0, 20.0–22.5, 22.5–25.0, ≥ 25 kg/m 2) and measured before oocyte retrieval. The normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates were compared. In addition, in the 7,122 frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) with highest-grade embryos, the clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were investigated in the five BMI groups. Multiple regression analysis on normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates revealed no statistically significant differences. Furthermore, after propensity score matching on FET, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates in the BMI groups. BMI is a risk factor for complications during pregnancy; however, it does not affect ART outcomes. Therefore, we believe weight guidance should be provided to women with obesity at the start of infertility treatment, but treatment should not be delayed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.

          Semen quality is taken as a surrogate measure of male fecundity in clinical andrology, male fertility, reproductive toxicology, epidemiology and pregnancy risk assessments. Reference intervals for values of semen parameters from a fertile population could provide data from which prognosis of fertility or diagnosis of infertility can be extrapolated. Semen samples from over 4500 men in 14 countries on four continents were obtained from retrospective and prospective analyses on fertile men, men of unknown fertility status and men selected as normozoospermic. Men whose partners had a time-to-pregnancy (TTP) of < or =12 months were chosen as individuals to provide reference distributions for semen parameters. Distributions were also generated for a population assumed to represent the general population. The following one-sided lower reference limits, the fifth centiles (with 95th percent confidence intervals), were generated from men whose partners had TTP < or = 12 months: semen volume, 1.5 ml (1.4-1.7); total sperm number, 39 million per ejaculate (33-46); sperm concentration, 15 million per ml (12-16); vitality, 58% live (55-63); progressive motility, 32% (31-34); total (progressive + non-progressive) motility, 40% (38-42); morphologically normal forms, 4.0% (3.0-4.0). Semen quality of the reference population was superior to that of the men from the general population and normozoospermic men. The data represent sound reference distributions of semen characteristics of fertile men in a number of countries. They provide an appropriate tool in conjunction with clinical data to evaluate a patient's semen quality and prospects for fertility.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer.

            To determine the relationship between blastocyst score and pregnancy outcome. Retrospective review of blastocyst transfer in an IVF clinic. Private assisted reproductive technology unit. 107 patients undergoing blastocyst culture and transfer of two embryos. Culture of all pronucleate embryos in sequential media to the blastocyst stage (day 5), followed by transfer of two blastocysts. Implantation rates, pregnancy rates, and twinning were analyzed. When a patient received two top-scoring blastocysts (64% of patients), implantation and pregnancy rates were 70% and 87%, respectively. The twinning rate in this group was 61%. When only one top-quality blastocyst was available for transfer (21% of patients), the implantation and pregnancy rates were 50% and 70%. The twinning rate for this group was 50%. In contrast, when only low-scoring blastocysts were available for transfer (15% of patients), implantation and pregnancy rates were 28% and 44%, and the twinning rate was 29%. No monozygotic twins were observed in this group of patients. The ability to transfer one high-scoring blastocyst should lead to pregnancy rates greater than 60%, without the complication of twins.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pregnancy outcomes decline with increasing body mass index: analysis of 239,127 fresh autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from the 2008-2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.

              To examine the effect of body mass index (BMI) on IVF outcomes in fresh autologous cycles.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nkidera02040828@yahoo.co.jp
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                8 September 2023
                8 September 2023
                2023
                : 13
                : 14817
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Denentoshi Ladies Clinic, 1-5-1 Azamino Aoba-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken 225-0011 Japan
                [2 ]GRID grid.265073.5, ISNI 0000 0001 1014 9130, Department of Comprehensive Reproductive Medicine, , Tokyo Medical and Dental University, ; 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo-to 113-8510 Japan
                [3 ]GRID grid.265073.5, ISNI 0000 0001 1014 9130, Department of Perinatal and Maternal Medicine (Ibaraki), , Tokyo Medical and Dental University, ; 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo-to 113-8510 Japan
                Article
                41780
                10.1038/s41598-023-41780-4
                10491661
                37684397
                c677e0c2-38bb-4458-a9aa-569600d6eea8
                © Springer Nature Limited 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 February 2023
                : 31 August 2023
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2023

                Uncategorized
                medical research,risk factors
                Uncategorized
                medical research, risk factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article