Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Examining the associations between food worry and mental health during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Little is known about the association between mental health and diminished food worry during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper examines worry about having enough food to meet household needs and its association with mental health during the early months of the pandemic in Canada.

          Methods

          Data are drawn from the first round of a multi-round mental health monitoring survey. Online surveys were administered between May 14 and 29, 2020, to a nationally representative sample of Canadian adults ( n = 3000). Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between food worry and mental health indicators (anxious/worried, depressed, worse mental health compared with pre-pandemic, and suicidal thoughts/feelings), after adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics and pre-existing mental health conditions. Fully adjusted models explored the impact of controlling for financial worry due to the pandemic in the previous 2 weeks.

          Results

          Overall, 17.3% of the sample reported food worry due to the pandemic in the previous 2 weeks, with the highest prevalence found among those with a reported disability (29.3%), Indigenous identity (27.1%), or pre-existing mental health condition (25.3%). Compared with participants who did not report food worry, those who did had higher odds of reporting feeling anxious/worried (OR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.08–1.71) and suicidal thoughts/feelings (OR=1.87, 95% CI: 1.24–2.80) when controlling for socio-demographics, pre-existing mental health conditions, and financial worry.

          Conclusion

          This paper provides insights about the associations between food worry and mental health in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic and indicates the need for improved policies and social supports to mitigate food worry and associated mental health outcomes.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.17269/s41997-021-00557-w.

          Résumé

          Objectif

          On en sait peu sur l’association entre la santé mentale et la diminution des inquiétudes liées à la nourriture durant la pandémie de COVID-19. Notre article porte sur l’inquiétude de ne pas avoir suffisamment de nourriture pour répondre aux besoins du ménage et son association avec la santé mentale au cours des premiers mois de la pandémie au Canada.

          Méthode

          Nos données proviennent du premier cycle d’une enquête de surveillance de la santé mentale. Des sondages en ligne ont été administrés entre le 14 et le 29 mai 2020 à un échantillon national représentatif de Canadiennes et de Canadiens adultes ( n = 3 000). Des modèles de régression logistique ont servi à examiner les associations entre les inquiétudes liées à la nourriture et quelques indicateurs de santé mentale (anxiété/inquiétude, dépression, santé mentale pire qu’avant la pandémie, pensées/sentiments suicidaires) après l’apport d’ajustements pour tenir compte du profil sociodémographique et des troubles de santé mentale préexistants. À l’aide de modèles entièrement ajustés, nous avons exploré l’effet de la prise en compte des soucis financiers dus à la pandémie au cours des deux semaines antérieures.

          Résultats

          Dans l’ensemble, le pourcentage de l’échantillon ayant fait état d’inquiétudes liées à la nourriture dues à la pandémie au cours des deux semaines antérieures était de 17,3 %, la plus forte prévalence ayant été constatée chez les répondants ayant un handicap déclaré (29,3 %), une identité autochtone (27,1 %) ou un trouble de santé mental préexistant (25,3 %). Comparativement aux participants n’ayant fait état d’aucune inquiétude liée à la nourriture, ceux qui ont fait état de telles inquiétudes présentaient une plus forte probabilité d’avoir déclaré des sentiments d’anxiété ou d’inquiétude (RC = 1,36, IC de 95 % : 1,08-1,71) et des pensées ou sentiments suicidaires (RC = 1,87, IC de 95 % : 1,24-2,80) après la prise en compte du profil sociodémographique, des troubles de santé mentale préexistants et des soucis financiers.

          Conclusion

          Notre article jette un éclairage sur les associations entre les inquiétudes liées à la nourriture et la santé mentale au Canada durant la pandémie de COVID-19 et montre qu’il faudrait améliorer les politiques et les mesures de soutien social pour atténuer les inquiétudes liées à la nourriture et les résultats de santé mentale associés.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates

          Abstract Background Research shows that the COVID Stress Scales have a robust multifactorial structure, representing five correlated facets of COVID‐19‐related distress: (a) Fear of the dangerousness of COVID‐19, which includes fear of coming into contact with fomites potentially contaminated with SARSCoV2, (b) worry about socioeconomic costs of COVID‐19 (e.g., worry about personal finances and disruption in the supply chain), (c) xenophobic fears that foreigners are spreading SARSCoV2, (d) traumatic stress symptoms associated with direct or vicarious traumatic exposure to COVID‐19 (nightmares, intrusive thoughts, or images related to COVID‐19), and (e) COVID‐19‐related compulsive checking and reassurance seeking. These factors cohere to form a COVID stress syndrome, which we sought to further delineate in the present study. Methods A population‐representative sample of 6,854 American and Canadian adults completed a self‐report survey comprising questions about current mental health and COVID‐19‐related experiences, distress, and coping. Results Network analysis revealed that worry about the dangerousness of COVID‐19 is the central feature of the syndrome. Latent class analysis indicated that the syndrome is quasi‐dimensional, comprising five classes differing in syndrome severity. Sixteen percent of participants were in the most severe class and possibly needing mental health services. Syndrome severity was correlated with preexisting psychopathology and with excessive COVID‐19‐related avoidance, panic buying, and coping difficulties during self‐isolation. Conclusion The findings provide new information about the structure and correlates of COVID stress syndrome. Further research is needed to determine whether the syndrome will abate once the pandemic has passed or whether, for some individuals, it becomes a chronic condition.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Safety of foods, food supply chain and environment within the COVID-19 pandemic

            Background The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a new era in the world while we still figure out the consequences in different aspects of our daily life. The food supply chain and the food industry do not comprise an exception. Scope and approach This review summarizes the possible transmission ways of COVID-19 through the foods, food supply chain, surfaces, and environment before exploring the development of corresponding detection tools of SARS-CoV-2. For the time being, the possibility of transmission through the food sector is considered negligible, and tracing of SARS-CoV-2 in working environments is not considered as a priority by public authorities. However, the adverse effects on the environment, food systems, and people along the food supply chain are already evident. Key findings and conclusions As long as we move from farm to fork, more safety measures are needed since more people (and subsequently more potential sources of infection) are involved in the process. The need for developing respective bioanalytical protocols for food and environmental safety applications to adapt in the post-lockdown period is also highlighted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Food insecurity and mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

              Objective: Food security has been suggested to be a risk factor for depression, stress and anxiety. We therefore undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of available publications to examine these associations further. Design: Relevant studies were identified by searching Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and PubMed databases up to January 2019. Setting: OR was pooled using a random-effects model. Standard methods were used for assessment of heterogeneity and publication bias. Participants: Data were available from nineteen studies with 372 143 individual participants from ten different countries that were pooled for the meta-analysis. Results: The results showed there was a positive relationship between food insecurity (FI) and risk of depression (OR = 1·40; 95 % CI: 1·30, 1·58) and stress (OR = 1·34; 95 % CI: 1·24, 1·44) but not anxiety. Subgroup analysis by age showed that subjects older than ≥65 years exhibited a higher risk of depression (OR = 1·75; 95 % CI: 1·20, 2·56) than younger participants (OR = 1·34; 95 % CI: 1·20, 1·50), as well as a greater risk of depression in men (OR = 1·42; 95 % CI: 1·17, 1·72) than women (OR = 1·30; 95 % CI: 1·16, 1·46). Finally, subgroup analysis according to geographical location illustrated that food insecure households living in North America had the highest risk of stress and anxiety. Conclusions: The evidence from this meta-analysis suggests that FI has a significant effect on the likelihood of being stressed or depressed. This indicates that health care services, which alleviate FI, would also promote holistic well-being in adults.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                emily.jenkins@ubc.ca
                Journal
                Can J Public Health
                Can J Public Health
                Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0008-4263
                1920-7476
                12 August 2021
                : 1-10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.17091.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, School of Nursing, , University of British Columbia, ; T201-2211 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5 Canada
                [2 ]GRID grid.17091.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, Food, Nutrition, and Health, , University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
                [3 ]GRID grid.17091.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, School of Population and Public Health, , University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4649-2904
                Article
                557
                10.17269/s41997-021-00557-w
                8359635
                34383262
                c6598295-26d8-4ce8-bcf5-0f847e188a95
                © The Canadian Public Health Association 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 11 January 2021
                : 21 June 2021
                Categories
                Special Section on COVID-19: Quantitative Research

                mental health,public health,food insecurity,food security,covid-19 pandemic,suicidality,santé mentale,santé publique,insécurité alimentaire,sécurité alimentaire,pandémie de covid-19,suicidalité

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content120

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors192