Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Distinct foliar fungal communities in Pinus contorta across native and introduced ranges: evidence for context dependency of pathogen release

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Inter-continental study systems are crucial for testing ecological hypotheses, such as the widely cited Enemy Release Hypothesis (ERH), which seeks to explain the superior performance of plant species when they are introduced to new regions. Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine), native to North America, has been extensively introduced to Europe and the Southern Hemisphere, making it an ideal tree species for studying invasion hypotheses from a biogeographical perspective. We compared foliar fungal communities, especially pathogens, of P. contorta across two native–introduced region pairs (NIRPs): a northern NIRP (from Canada to Sweden) and a southern NIRP (from the USA to Patagonia), while also examining the differences between source plantations and invasion fronts within Patagonia. P. contorta underwent significant fungal community shifts and experienced pathogen release during its large-scale introduction from North America to Sweden and Patagonia. The fungal richness and relative abundance changes were more pronounced for the southern NIRP pair, where no closely related tree species to P. contorta are present in Patagonia. In Sweden, the presence of the phylogenetically related P. sylvestris and its associated local fungal community appears to play a role in influencing the foliar fungal communities associated with introduced P. contorta. In Patagonia, the incomplete co-invasion of fungal taxa from the USA emerges as a principal driver of the observed variability in fungal community composition and pathogen release following the introduction of P. contorta. In Patagonia, fungal community composition differences between source plantations and invasion fronts provided insufficient evidence that pathogen release occurs at this local scale. Integrating both biogeographical and phylogenetic perspectives, our study suggests that priority effects of local fungi appear to be a dominant community assembly process when introduction is done in a phylogenetically similar community; whereas, co-invasion of fungal communities is the dominant process in phylogenetically distant communities.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-91639-z.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data

          We present DADA2, a software package that models and corrects Illumina-sequenced amplicon errors. DADA2 infers sample sequences exactly, without coarse-graining into OTUs, and resolves differences of as little as one nucleotide. In several mock communities DADA2 identified more real variants and output fewer spurious sequences than other methods. We applied DADA2 to vaginal samples from a cohort of pregnant women, revealing a diversity of previously undetected Lactobacillus crispatus variants.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report

              Motivation: Fast and accurate quality control is essential for studies involving next-generation sequencing data. Whilst numerous tools exist to quantify QC metrics, there is no common approach to flexibly integrate these across tools and large sample sets. Assessing analysis results across an entire project can be time consuming and error prone; batch effects and outlier samples can easily be missed in the early stages of analysis. Results: We present MultiQC, a tool to create a single report visualising output from multiple tools across many samples, enabling global trends and biases to be quickly identified. MultiQC can plot data from many common bioinformatics tools and is built to allow easy extension and customization. Availability and implementation: MultiQC is available with an GNU GPLv3 license on GitHub, the Python Package Index and Bioconda. Documentation and example reports are available at http://multiqc.info Contact: phil.ewels@scilifelab.se
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ruirui.zhao@slu.se
                Michael.Gundale@slu.se
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                1 March 2025
                1 March 2025
                2025
                : 15
                : 7273
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, ( https://ror.org/02yy8x990) Umeå, SE-90183 Sweden
                [2 ]EcoFutures, Brisbane, 4006 Australia
                [3 ]Grupo de Ecología de Invasiones, INIBIOMA-UNComa, CONICET, ( https://ror.org/03cqe8w59) Bariloche, AR-8400 Argentina
                [4 ]Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, ( https://ror.org/048sx0r50) Houston, TX-77204 USA
                [5 ]Dirección de Investigación, Vicerrectoría Académica, Universidad de Talca, ( https://ror.org/01s4gpq44) Talca, 3460000 Chile
                [6 ]Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB), ( https://ror.org/047gc3g35) Las Palmeras 3425, Ñuñoa, 7750000 Chile
                [7 ]Science Department, Augustana Faculty, University of Alberta, ( https://ror.org/0160cpw27) Camrose, AB T4V 2R3 Canada
                Article
                91639
                10.1038/s41598-025-91639-z
                11873135
                40025140
                c63aad3a-bdd5-4890-a190-2cbbde55ae67
                © The Author(s) 2025

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 November 2024
                : 21 February 2025
                Funding
                Funded by: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2025

                Uncategorized
                lodgepole pine,foliar microbiota,pathogens,biogeographical variation,tree invasion,enemy release hypothesis,forest ecology,invasive species

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content35

                Most referenced authors975