4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Substantia Nigra Pathology, Contact Sports Play, and Parkinsonism in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Parkinsonism is associated with traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a neurodegenerative disease associated with repetitive head impact (RHI) exposure, but the neuropathologic substrates that underlie parkinsonism in individuals with CTE are yet to be defined.

          Objective

          To evaluate the frequency of parkinsonism in individuals with CTE and the association of RHI and neuropathologic substrates with parkinsonism in these individuals.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cross-sectional study included brain donors with neuropathologically diagnosed CTE without other significant neurodegenerative disease and with information on parkinsonism from the Understanding Neurologic Injury and Traumatic Encephalopathy brain bank between July 2015 and May 2022.

          Exposure

          Years of contact sports participation as a proxy for RHI.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The main outcomes were frequency of parkinsonism in individuals with CTE and associations between (1) RHI with substantia nigra (SN) Lewy bodies (LBs) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs); (2) LBs, NFTs, and arteriolosclerosis with SN neuronal loss; and (3) SN neuronal loss, LBs, NFTs, and arteriolosclerosis with parkinsonism, tested by age-adjusted logistic regressions.

          Results

          Of 481 male brain donors with neuropathologically diagnosed CTE, parkinsonism occurred frequently in individuals with CTE (119 [24.7%]; 362 [75.3%] did not have parkinsonism). Participants with parkinsonism had a higher mean (SD) age at death (71.5 [13.0] years) than participants without parkinsonism (54.1 [19.3] years) ( P < .001) and higher rates of dementia (104 [87.4%] vs 105 [29.0%]), visual hallucinations (45 [37.8%] vs 51 [14.1%]), and probable rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (52 [43.7%] vs 58 [16.0%]) ( P < .001 for all). Participants with parkinsonism had a more severe CTE stage (eg, stage IV: 35 [29.4%] vs 39 [10.8%]) and nigral pathology than those without parkinsonism (NFTs: 50 of 117 [42.7%] vs 103 of 344 [29.9%]; P = .01; neuronal loss: 61 of 117 [52.1%] vs 59 of 344 [17.1%]; P < .001; and LBs: 28 of 116 [24.1%] vs 20 of 342 [5.8%]; P < .001). Years of contact sports participation were associated with SN NFTs (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07; P = .03) and neuronal loss (AOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .02). Nigral neuronal loss (AOR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.52-4.47; P < .001) and LBs (AOR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.15-4.57; P = .02) were associated with parkinsonism. However, SN neuronal loss was associated with SN LBs (AOR, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.25-8.92; P < .001), SN NFTs (AOR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.52-4.15; P < .001), and arteriolosclerosis (AOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.33-3.85; P = .002). In American football players, regression analysis demonstrated that SN NFTs and neuronal loss mediated the association between years of play and parkinsonism in the context of CTE (β, 0.012; 95% CI, 0.001-0.038).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cross-sectional study of contact sports athletes with CTE, years of contact sports participation were associated with SN tau pathology and neuronal loss, and these pathologies were associated with parkinsonism. Repetitive head impacts may incite neuropathologic processes that lead to symptoms of parkinsonism in individuals with CTE.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease.

          This document presents the Movement Disorder Society Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's disease (PD). The Movement Disorder Society PD Criteria are intended for use in clinical research but also may be used to guide clinical diagnosis. The benchmark for these criteria is expert clinical diagnosis; the criteria aim to systematize the diagnostic process, to make it reproducible across centers and applicable by clinicians with less expertise in PD diagnosis. Although motor abnormalities remain central, increasing recognition has been given to nonmotor manifestations; these are incorporated into both the current criteria and particularly into separate criteria for prodromal PD. Similar to previous criteria, the Movement Disorder Society PD Criteria retain motor parkinsonism as the core feature of the disease, defined as bradykinesia plus rest tremor or rigidity. Explicit instructions for defining these cardinal features are included. After documentation of parkinsonism, determination of PD as the cause of parkinsonism relies on three categories of diagnostic features: absolute exclusion criteria (which rule out PD), red flags (which must be counterbalanced by additional supportive criteria to allow diagnosis of PD), and supportive criteria (positive features that increase confidence of the PD diagnosis). Two levels of certainty are delineated: clinically established PD (maximizing specificity at the expense of reduced sensitivity) and probable PD (which balances sensitivity and specificity). The Movement Disorder Society criteria retain elements proven valuable in previous criteria and omit aspects that are no longer justified, thereby encapsulating diagnosis according to current knowledge. As understanding of PD expands, the Movement Disorder Society criteria will need continuous revision to accommodate these advances.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

            Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study’s generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. We convened a two-day workshop, in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury.

              Since the 1920s, it has been known that the repetitive brain trauma associated with boxing may produce a progressive neurological deterioration, originally termed dementia pugilistica, and more recently, chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). We review 48 cases of neuropathologically verified CTE recorded in the literature and document the detailed findings of CTE in 3 profession althletes, 1 football player and 2 boxers. Clinically, CTE is associated with memory disturbances, behavioral and personality changes, parkinsonism, and speech and gait abnormalities. Neuropathologically, CTE is characterized by atrophy of the cerebral hemispheres, medial temporal lobe, thalamus, mammillary bodies, and brainstem, with ventricular dilatation and a fenestrated cavum septum pellucidum. Microscopically, there are extensive tau-immunoreactive neurofibrillary tangles, astrocytic tangles, and spindle-shaped and threadlike neurites throughout the brain. The neurofibrillary degeneration of CTE is distinguished from other tauopathies by preferential involvement of the superficial cortical layers, irregular patchy distribution in the frontal and temporal cortices, propensity for sulcal depths, prominent perivascular, periventricular, and subpial distribution, and marked accumulation of tau-immunoreactive astrocytes. Deposition of beta-amyloid, most commonly as diffuse plaques, occurs in fewer than half the cases. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy is a neuropathologically distinct slowly progressive tauopathy with a clear environmental etiology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Neurology
                JAMA Neurol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2168-6149
                July 15 2024
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease and CTE Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
                [2 ]Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla
                [3 ]Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
                [4 ]Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
                [5 ]VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
                [6 ]VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts
                [7 ]Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
                [8 ]Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [9 ]Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [10 ]Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mass General Brigham-Spaulding Rehabilitation, Charlestown, Massachusetts
                [11 ]Concussion Legacy Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts
                [12 ]Brain Injury Program, Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital, Braintree, Massachusetts
                [13 ]Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
                [14 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
                [15 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Emerson Hospital, Concord, Massachusetts
                [16 ]Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
                Article
                10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2166
                c5c2e005-3126-47bb-ae68-e40c83308ba0
                © 2024
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article