Effect of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Deep Surgical Site Infection After Surgery for Lower Limb Fractures Associated With Major Trauma : The WHIST Randomized Clinical Trial

To investigate negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to prevent wound dehiscence and infection after high-risk lower extremity trauma. Prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial. Four Level I trauma centers. Blunt trauma patients with one of three high-risk fracture types (tibial plateau, pilon, calcaneus) requiring surgical stabilization. Incisional NPWT (Group B) was applied to the closed surgical incisions of patients randomized to the study arm of this trial, whereas standard postoperative dressings (Group A) were applied to the control patients. Acute and chronic wound dehiscence and infection. Two hundred forty-nine patients with 263 fractures have enrolled in this study with 122 randomized to Group A (controls) and 141 to Group B (NPWT). There was no difference between the groups in the distribution of calcaneus (39%), pilon (17%), or tibial plateau (44%) fractures. There were a total of 23 infections in Group A and 14 in Group B, which represented a significant difference in favor of NPWT (P = 0.049). The relative risk of developing an infection was 1.9 times higher in control patients than in patients treated with NPWT (95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.55). There have been no studies evaluating incisional NPWT as a prophylactic treatment to prevent infection and wound dehiscence of high-risk surgical incisions. Our data demonstrate that there is a decreased incidence of wound dehiscence and total infections after high-risk fractures when patients have NPWT applied to their surgical incisions after closure. There is also a strong trend for decreases in acute infections after NPWT. Based on our data in this multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial, NPWT should be considered for high-risk wounds after severe skeletal trauma.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate an instrument for assessment of physical disability, mainly intended for clinical settings, the Disability Rating Index (DRI). Healthy persons (n = 1092), both white and blue collar workers, and patients (n = 366) with different levels of physical capacity, were assessed. Most of the patients (n = 303) underwent rehabilitation programmes for neck/shoulder/low-back pain but some (n = 47) were arthritis patients waiting for hip or knee replacement surgery, or wheelchair patients with multiple sclerosis (n = 16). The reliability was investigated by test-retest studies, intra- and inter-rater and internal consistency studies. Five construct validity tests were carried out: a discrimination study; a converging validity test; a test for sensitivity to small alterations in health status; and two correlational validity tests. Correlation of the self-reported DRI to the actual performance in similar activities was carried out. Responsiveness was tested by correlation of the DRI before/after replacement surgery for arthritis. The test-retest correlations were 0.83-0.95 in the studies, including correlation of different versions. The intra- and inter-rater reproducibility was 0.98 and 0.99 respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test in the discrimination study yielded p < 0.0001. More than 90% of the respondents completed the questionnaire correctly. Correlation of the DRI to the Functional Status Questionnaire was 0.46. The responsiveness was excellent, p = 0.0001. The DRI proved to be a robust, practical clinical and research instrument with good responsiveness and acceptability for assessment of disability caused by impairment of common motor functions.

Open fractures of the lower limb occur when a broken bone penetrates the skin. There can be major complications from these fractures, which can be life-changing.