1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Randomized clinical trial comparing spinal anesthesia with local anesthesia with sedation for loop colostomy closure Translated title: Ensaio clínico randomizado comparando raquianestesia com anestesia local, associadas à sedação para o fechamento de colostomia em alça

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          CONTEXT: Recent studies have shown that local anesthesia for loop colostomy closure is as safe as spinal anesthesia for this procedure. OBJECTIVES: Randomized clinical trial to compare the results from these two techniques. METHODS: Fifty patients were randomized for loop colostomy closure using spinal anesthesia (n = 25) and using local anesthesia (n = 25). Preoperatively, the bowel was evaluated by means of colonoscopy, and bowel preparation was performed with 10% oral mannitol solution and physiological saline solution for lavage through the distal colostomy orifice. All patients were given prophylactic antibiotics (cefoxitin). Pain, analgesia, reestablishment of peristaltism or peristalsis, diet reintroduction, length of hospitalization and rehospitalization were analyzed postoperatively. RESULTS: Surgery duration and local complications were greater in the spinal anesthesia group. Conversion to general anesthesia occurred only with spinal anesthesia. There was no difference in intraoperative pain between the groups, but postoperative pain, reestablishment of peristaltism or peristalsis, diet reintroduction and length of hospitalization were lower with local anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthesia plus sedation offers a safer and more effective method than spinal anesthesia for loop colostomy closure.

          Translated abstract

          CONTEXTO: Estudos recentes têm demonstrado que a anestesia local para o fechamento de colostomia em alça é tão segura quanto a raquianestesia para estes procedimentos. OBJETIVOS: Comparar os resultados do fechamento de colostomia em alça usando essas duas técnicas. MÉTODOS: Cinquenta pacientes foram randomizados para o fechamento de colostomia em alça sob raquianestesia (n = 25) e anestesia local (n = 25). No pré-operatório, o cólon foi avaliado por colonoscopia e o preparo intestinal foi realizado com solução oral de manitol a 10% e limpeza com solução salina fisiológica através do orifício distal da colostomia. Todos os pacientes receberam antibioticoprofilaxia com cefoxitina. Dor, analgesia, restabelecimento do peristaltismo, reintrodução da dieta, tempo de internação e de reinternação foram analisados no pós-operatório. RESULTADOS: Duração da cirurgia e complicações locais foram maiores no grupo da raquianestesia. A conversão para anestesia geral ocorreu somente no grupo da raquianestesia. Em relação á dor intraoperatória, não houve diferença entre os grupos, mas a dor pós-operatória, restabelecimento do peristaltismo, reintrodução da dieta e tempo de hospitalização foram menores no grupo com anestesia local. CONCLUSÃO: A anestesia local associada à sedação ofereceu um método mais seguro e efetivo que a raquianestesia para o fechamento de colostomia em alça.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Complications of abdominal stoma surgery.

          P Shellito (1998)
          This study was undertaken to review and summarize the complications of ileostomy and colostomy creation and subsequent closure. The English-language medical literature for at least the past 15 years was reviewed comprehensively. Complications of surgery for the creation of end, loop, and "end loop" stomas are presented. Technical factors, which might influence complication rates, are discussed. Optimal management of ostomy complications is presented, especially for peristomal hernias. Similarly, techniques and complications for stoma closure are analyzed. Stoma creation is not a trivial undertaking; careful surgical technique minimizes complications (which are relatively frequent), and promotes good ostomy function. Peristomal hernias are difficult to cure permanently. The morbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure is also appreciable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

              The consequences of leakage from low colorectal or coloanal anastomoses are reduced by the use of a loop stoma to divert the faecal stream. Controversy continues as to whether loop ileostomy (LI) or loop transverse colostomy (LTC) is the optimal method of defunctioning such anastomoses. Patients requiring defunctioning following anterior resection and total mesorectal excision were randomized to receive either LI or LTC. Comparison was made between the groups regarding the difficulty of stoma formation and closure, the recovery after stoma closure and stoma-related complications. The minimum follow-up after stoma closure was 6 months (median 36 months). Between October 1995 and August 1999, 70 patients were randomized (LTC 36, LI 34) of whom 63 underwent stoma closure (LTC 31, LI 32). There were no significant differences in the difficulty of formation or closure, or in the postoperative recovery between the groups. However, there were ten complications related directly to the stoma in the LTC group: faecal fistula (one patient), prolapse (two), parastomal hernia (two) and incisional hernia during follow-up (five). None of these complications occurred in the LI group. In this randomized study, the frequency of herniation before or after colostomy closure supports the choice of LI as a method of defunctioning a low anastomosis. Both methods appear to provide satisfactory protection for the low anastomosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ag
                Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
                Arq. Gastroenterol.
                Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. (São Paulo, SP, Brazil )
                0004-2803
                1678-4219
                September 2010
                : 47
                : 3
                : 270-274
                Affiliations
                [01] Araguaína TO orgnameInstituto Tocantinense Presidente Antonio Carlos orgdiv1Faculty of Medicine orgdiv2Department of Surgery Brazil
                [02] São Paulo SP orgnameMandaqui Hospital Complex orgdiv1General Surgery and Anesthesiology Services Brazil
                [03] São Paulo SP orgnameMandaqui Hospital Complex orgdiv1Anesthesiology Services Brazil
                [04] São Paulo SP orgnameFederal University of São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina Brazil
                Article
                S0004-28032010000300011 S0004-2803(10)04700311
                c561daf6-26b8-4510-a1f3-ad17a2b76316

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 20 October 2009
                : 26 February 2010
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 16, Pages: 5
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Original Articles

                Anesthesia, spinal,Colostomy,Colostomia,Anestesia local,Raquianestesia,Anesthesia, local

                Comments

                Comment on this article