1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reconstruction of Lumbar Spinal Defects: Case Series, Literature Review, and Treatment Algorithm

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Lumbar spinal defects present a distinct challenge for the reconstructive surgeon and are often complicated by previous spinal surgery, the presence of hardware, and prior radiation. There are a variety of reconstructive options described but no clear treatment algorithm for these challenging defects.

          Methods:

          A literature search was performed to review the described treatment options for lumbar spinal soft-tissue defects. Treatments for myelomeningocele or pressure ulcers were excluded. In addition, a retrospective case review was performed for patients with lumbar defects treated with pedicled superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap reconstruction.

          Results:

          A literature review revealed 2,022 articles pertaining to lumbar defect reconstruction, of which 56 met inclusion criteria. These articles described 13 individual reconstructive techniques for this anatomic area. The most commonly described techniques were evaluated and a treatment algorithm designed based on patient and wound characteristics. The clinical course of 5 patients with radiated lumbar spinal defects treated with SGAP flaps is presented.

          Conclusions:

          There are many treatment options for lumbar spinal defects and treatment should be tailored to the patient and the characteristics of the defect. For large or radiated lumbar wounds, the pedicled SGAP flap is an excellent reconstructive choice, as it has reliable anatomy that is outside the zone of injury, adequate bulk, and minimal donor-site deficits.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps in Lower Extremity Traumatic Reconstruction: A Multicenter Outcomes Analysis.

          Clinical indications are expanding for the use of fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity traumatic reconstruction. The authors assessed the impact of muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flap coverage on reconstructive and functional outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Perforator-based flaps for low posterior midline defects.

            A new type of flap is described based on unnamed perforators located near the midline of the lower back region. Such flaps combine the superior blood supply of the myocutaneous flap with the lack of donor-site morbidity of a skin flap. Five clinical cases are presented, showing how such perforators can augment skin flaps or create custom-designed island flaps. The dissection of the flap is described, and further possibilities for its use are suggested.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Outcome comparison between free muscle and free fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction of distal third and ankle traumatic open tibial fractures.

              The advantages of free muscle flaps for reconstruction of lower extremity defects have been largely reported to be superior to those of fasciocutaneous flaps. One hundred seventy-four patients received 177 microsurgical free tissue transfers for distal third and ankle open tibial fractures. Patients were divided into two groups. In group I, 96 patients received 98 free muscle flaps (55.4 percent). In group II, 78 patients were treated with 79 free fasciocutaneous flaps (44.6 percent). Complete flap survival was 92.9 percent and 91.1 percent in groups I and II, respectively. Postoperative infection was 11.2 percent in group I and 12.7 percent in group II. Chronic osteomyelitis developed in 9.3 percent and 12.7 percent in groups I and II, respectively. The rate of primary bone union was 84.5 percent in group I and 81 percent in group II and the rate of overall bone union was 96.9 percent in group I and 98.7 percent in group II. Finally, 92 patients in group I and 77 patients in group II could walk without crutches at 2-year follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the two flaps. The authors achieved equal functional outcomes in both soft-tissue transfers because of (1) preoperative adequate débridement of wounds and (2) selection of proper free flaps in appropriate defects. Defects with serious tridimensionality needed free muscle flaps because they conform better to such complex defects. However, free fasciocutaneous flaps are reliable and as effective for covering the less three-dimensional distal third and ankle traumatic open tibial fractures as free muscle flaps and can better tolerate the subsequent secondary surgical procedures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                2169-7574
                January 2019
                11 January 2019
                : 7
                : 1
                : e2089
                Affiliations
                From the [* ]Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Mass.
                []Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
                []Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
                Author notes
                Kyle Eberlin, MD, Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, E-mail: keberlin@ 123456mgh.harvard.edu
                Article
                00013
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000002089
                6382243
                c4db638a-97ff-4bb7-b7d0-77162593ecdc
                Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 27 September 2018
                : 6 November 2018
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article