0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Surgical outcomes of transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: single surgeon’s initial experience

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy (TUEB) is one of endoscopic enucleation methods for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Authors investigated initial outcomes of TUEB performed by a single surgeon.

          Methods

          From 04/2016 to 06/2021, prospectively collected clinical data of 387 patients who underwent TUEB were retrospectively analyzed. TUEB was performed by transurethral resection in a saline system with a spatula loop (one-lobe enucleation technique). Patients were stratified by surgery period (early vs. late) and evaluated perioperatively.

          Results

          A total of 387 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 72.4 years and total prostate volume was 73.1 cc as in the whole group. Total procedure time (116.0 vs. 116.8 min, p = 0.863), detailed procedure time (enucleation: 49.2 vs. 46.1 min, p = 0.099; morcellation: 26.5 vs. 23.6 min, p = 0.162) and enucleated tissue weight (26.1 g vs. 27.9 g, p = 0.350) did not differ significantly between groups. However, there were significant differences in enucleated tissue weight per unit time (g/min) (0.52 vs. 0.58, p = 0.037), reoperation rates due to bleeding (9.8% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.002), and conversion to transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) (19.2% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). At 6 months post-operatively, there were insignificant differences in the rates of de novo stress incontinence ( p = 0.188), urethral stricture ( p = 0.158), and bladder neck contracture ( p = 0.477).

          Conclusion

          TUEB is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of BPH, resulting in significant improvements in both subjective and objective symptoms. With increasing surgical experience, efficacy of the procedure has significantly improved in terms of both bleeding complication rates and TURP conversion rates.

          Clinical trial number

          Not applicable.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction.

          Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) represent one of the most common clinical complaints in adult men and have multifactorial aetiology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years.

            To assess the durability of holmium laser enucleation of prostate in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients were enrolled in the present study between June 1997 and December 2000 and followed per protocol. All patients were urodynamically obstructed with a prostate volume of between 40 and 200 mL. At long-term follow-up, variables assessed included Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII), International Continence Society Short Form Male questionnaire (ICSmale-SF) and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Adverse events, including the need for retreatment, were specifically assessed. Thirty-one (14 holmium laser enucleation of the prostate [HoLEP] and 17 TURP) of the initial 61 patients were available, with 12 deceased and 18 lost to follow-up. The mean (range) follow-up was 7.6 (5.9-10.0) years and the mean (±sd) age at follow-up was 79.8 (±6.2) years. The mean (±sd) values (HoLEP vs TURP) were as follows: maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), 22.09 ± 15.47 vs 17.83 ± 8.61 mL/s; American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, 8.0 ± 5.2 vs 10.3 ± 7.42; quality of life (QOL) score 1.47 ± 1.31 vs 1.31 ± 0.85; BPHII, 1.53 ± 2.9 vs 0.58 ± 0.79; IIEF-EF (erectile function), 11.6 ± 7.46 vs 9.21 ± 7.17; ICSmale Voiding Score (VS), 4.2 ± 3.76 vs 3.0 ± 2.41; ICSmale Incontinence Score (IS), 3.07 ± 3.3 vs 1.17 ± 1.4. There were no significant differences in any variable between the two groups beyond the first year. Of the assessable patients, none required re-operation for recurrent BPH in the HoLEP arm and three (of 17) required re-operation in the TURP arm . The results of this randomized trial confirm that HoLEP is at least equivalent to TURP in the long term with fewer re-operations being necessary. © 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Korean Version of the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score Questionnaire: Translation and Linguistic Validation

              Purpose The overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) consists of 4 questions regarding OAB symptoms. The aim of this study was to develop Korean version of the OABSS from the original Japanese version, with subsequent linguistic validation. Methods Between February and May 2008, the translation and linguistic validation process was performed as follows: a forward translation, reconciliation, backward translation, cognitive debriefing, and final proofreading. Results A forward translation from the original version of the OABSS to the Korean language was carried out by 2 native Korean speakers, who were also fluent in Japanese. Reconciliation was made after review of both translations by a panel consisting of both translators and one of the authors. Another bilingual translator who had never seen the original version of the OABSS carried out a translation of the reconciled version back into Japanese, and the original and backward-translated versions were subsequently compared. After discussion of all discrepancies between both versions by the panel, a second Korean version was produced. During cognitive debriefing, 5 outpatients with OAB reported that each question of the Korean version was significant and appropriate for their symptoms. However, 2 patients said that some parts of the questions or instructions were not clear or were not easy to understand. According to the cognitive debriefing, some words and phrases were revised into more understandable expressions. Conclusions A Korean version of the OABSS was developed and linguistic validation was performed. Further studies are needed to assess the reproducibility and validity of the questionnaire in Korean populations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                urojsj@snubh.org
                Journal
                BMC Urol
                BMC Urol
                BMC Urology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2490
                12 February 2025
                12 February 2025
                2025
                : 25
                : 27
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, ( https://ror.org/04ngysf93) Anyang, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, ( https://ror.org/00cb3km46) 173-82, Gumi-Ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam, 13620 Korea
                [3 ]Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, ( https://ror.org/04h9pn542) Seoul, Korea
                Article
                1706
                10.1186/s12894-025-01706-w
                11817835
                39940001
                c4ac3946-76de-4950-806f-bd03455bfd55
                © The Author(s) 2025

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                : 30 September 2024
                : 30 January 2025
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2025

                Urology
                benign prostatic hyperplasia,bleeding complication,minimally invasive surgery,prostate,transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content560

                Most referenced authors198