Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy of the iDBT-Pain skills training intervention to reduce emotional dysregulation and pain intensity in people with chronic pain: protocol for a single-case experimental design with multiple baselines

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Difficulties in emotional regulation are key to the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Recent evidence shows internet-delivered dialectic behaviour therapy (iDBT) skills training can reduce emotional dysregulation and pain intensity. However, further studies are needed to provide more definitive evidence regarding the efficacy of iDBT skills training in the chronic pain population.

          Methods and analysis

          A single-case experimental design (SCED) with multiple baselines will be used to examine the efficacy of a 4-week iDBT-Pain skills training intervention (iDBT-Pain intervention) to reduce emotional dysregulation and pain intensity in individuals with chronic pain. The iDBT-Pain intervention encompasses two components: (1) iDBT-Pain skills training sessions (iDBT-Pain sessions) and (2) the iDBT-Pain skills training web application (iDBT-Pain app). Three individuals with chronic pain will be recruited and randomly allocated to different baseline phases (5, 9 or 12 days). Following the baseline phase, participants will receive six 60–90 min iDBT-Pain sessions approximately 4 or 5 days apart, delivered by a psychologist via Zoom. To reinforce learnings from the iDBT-Pain sessions, participants will have unlimited use of the iDBT-Pain app. A 7-day follow-up phase (maintenance) will follow the intervention, whereby the iDBT-Pain sessions cease but the iDBT-Pain app is accessible. Emotional regulation, as the primary outcome measure, will be assessed using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Pain intensity, as the secondary outcome measure, will be assessed using a visual analogue scale. Generalisation measures will assess psychological state factors (depression, anxiety and coping behaviour), alongside sleep quality, well-being and harm avoidance. SCEDs are increasingly considered effective designs for internet-delivered psychological interventions because SCED enables the investigation of interindividual variability in a heterogeneous population such as chronic pain.

          Ethics and dissemination

          This trial was approved by the University of New South Wales (HC200199). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

          Trial registration number

          ACTRN12620000604909.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          An inventory for measuring depression.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions.

              The prevalence and cost of chronic pain is a major physical and mental health care problem in the United States today. As a result, there has been a recent explosion of research on chronic pain, with significant advances in better understanding its etiology, assessment, and treatment. The purpose of the present article is to provide a review of the most noteworthy developments in the field. The biopsychosocial model is now widely accepted as the most heuristic approach to chronic pain. With this model in mind, a review of the basic neuroscience processes of pain (the bio part of biopsychosocial), as well as the psychosocial factors, is presented. This spans research on how psychological and social factors can interact with brain processes to influence health and illness as well as on the development of new technologies, such as brain imaging, that provide new insights into brain-pain mechanisms. Copyright 2007 APA
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2021
                14 April 2021
                : 11
                : 4
                : e041745
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentCentre for Pain IMPACT , Neuroscience Research Australia , Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
                [2 ]departmentSchool of Psychology , University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [3 ]departmentDepartment of Psychological Science , University of Missouri-St Louis , St Louis, Missouri, USA
                [4 ]departmentSchool of Computer Science and Engineering , University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [5 ]Microsoft Research , Redmond, Washington, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Sylvia Maria Gustin; s.gustin@ 123456unsw.edu.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0829-7016
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-041745
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041745
                8054083
                33853792
                c460c8d7-77f1-4fc0-a725-f3beca4a9e3c
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 June 2020
                : 08 March 2021
                : 09 March 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001061, Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation;
                Categories
                Mental Health
                1506
                1712
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                pain management,neurological pain,mental health
                Medicine
                pain management, neurological pain, mental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article