16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current Methods for the Treatment of Alveolar Cleft

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Alveolar cleft is a tornado-shaped bone defect in the maxillary arch. The treatment goals for alveolar cleft are stabilization and provision of bone continuity to the maxillary arch, permitting support for tooth eruption, eliminating oronasal fistulas, providing an improved esthetic result, and improving speech. Treatment protocols vary in terms of the operative time, surgical techniques, and graft materials. Early approaches including boneless bone grafting (gingivoperiosteoplasty) and primary bone graft fell into disfavor because they impaired facial growth, and they remain controversial. Secondary bone graft (SBG) is not the most perfect method, but long-term follow-up has shown that the graft is absorbed to a lesser extent, does not impede facial growth, and supports other teeth. Accordingly, SBG in the mixed dentition phase (6–11 years) has become the preferred method of treatment. The most commonly used graft material is cancellous bone from the iliac crest. Recently, many researchers have investigated the use of allogeneic bone, artificial bone, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein, along with growth factors because of their ability to decrease donor-site morbidity. Further investigations of bone substitutes and additives will continue to be needed to increase their effectiveness and to reduce complications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment.

          A combined surgical/orthodontic procedure to eliminate the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment is described. The operations have been carried out on 378 patients: 240 males and 138 females. Seventy-two patients had bilateral clefts, making a total of 450 grafted clefts. The optimal age for this secondary bone grafting has been found to be 9 to 11 years. In 292 of the cases, the canine had reached its final position in the arch, which allowed a four-group semiquantitative assessment of the newly obtained interdental septum on dental radiographs. The best results have been achieved in cases where the bone graft was carried out prior to the eruption of the canine. In this group, a normal (category I) interdental septal height was achieved in 64 percent and a slightly lower (category II) interdental septum in 32 percent. Interdental septa classified as type I and II are considered to be acceptable. The cleft space was closed in 90 percent of the cases. No significant difference between unilateral and bilateral cases was found. When the same procedure was carried out after eruption of the canine, the results were less favorable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Secondary alveolar bone grafting: the dilemma of donor site selection and morbidity.

            Fresh autogenous cancellous bone is ideal for secondary alveolar cleft bone grafting because it supplies living, immunocompatible bony cells that integrate fully with the maxilla and are essential for osteogenesis. Recent animal studies have shown that the dynamics of cancellous inlay bone grafts are different from those of cortical onlay bone grafts, and they refute the assumption that membranous bone grafts are superior to endochondral bone grafts because of their embryological origin. These studies prove that inlay endochondral cancellous specimens have a higher percentage increase in actual bony volume than cortical membranous and cortical endochondral inlay bone grafts. There are various donor sites for secondary alveolar cleft bone grafts. Currently the main sites for autogenous cancellous bone are iliac crest, calvarium, mandibular symphysis, and tibia. Some authors have suggested that the iliac crest donor site causes an unacceptably high degree of postoperative morbidity, but it is still the first choice for secondary alveolar cleft bone grafts and should not be rejected solely because of such concerns. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is now an attractive bony substitute that promotes the differentiation of pluripotential cells into bone-forming cells that lay down new host bone in the site of the defect. Much more research and development are necessary to find a suitable carrier for rhBMP-2, and to study the properties of newly formed bone that it has induced before it can be a substitute for autogenous bone.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Management of alveolar clefts.

              The management of alveolar clefts has changed through the years as medical knowledge has improved. An alveolar cleft is the result of abnormal primary palate formation during weeks 4 to 12 of gestation. The rationale for its closure includes 1) stabilizing the maxillary arch, 2) permitting support for tooth eruption, 3) eliminating oronasal fistulae, and 4) providing improved esthetic results. Methods for closure of the alveolar cleft have been solidified during the last century with the use of bone grafting. Secondary bone grafting is now the preferred method of treatment, because early grafting has proven detrimental to midfacial growth. Various materials for bone grafting have been proposed, including iliac crest, cranium, tibia, rib, and mandibular symphysis. Regardless of the timing and materials used, the main principles in approaching alveolar clefts have been well described. They include 1) appropriate flap design, 2) wide exposure, 3) nasal floor reconstruction, 4) closure of oronasal fistula, 5) packing bony defect with cancellous bone, and 6) coverage of bone graft with gingival mucoperiosteal flaps. Certain alveolar clefts are difficult to manage by grafting alone, and orthodontic preparation may be required. Complications of alveolar bone grafts include donor site morbidity as well as graft exposure and loss.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arch Plast Surg
                Arch Plast Surg
                APS
                Archives of Plastic Surgery
                The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
                2234-6163
                2234-6171
                May 2017
                22 May 2017
                : 44
                : 3
                : 188-193
                Affiliations
                Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Nak Heon Kang. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea. Tel: +82-42-280-7385, Fax: +82-42-280-7384, nhk488@ 123456cnu.ac.kr
                Article
                10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.188
                5447527
                28573092
                c3ee154b-df3b-4e5f-a788-dc16f2754a28
                Copyright © 2017 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 January 2017
                : 15 April 2017
                : 21 April 2017
                Categories
                Review Article

                Surgery
                alveolar bone grafting,bone substitutes,bone morphogenetic proteins
                Surgery
                alveolar bone grafting, bone substitutes, bone morphogenetic proteins

                Comments

                Comment on this article