1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Do Design Science Research and Design Thinking Processes Improve the ‘Fit’ of the Fit-For-Purpose Approach to Securing Land Tenure for All in South Africa?

      ,
      Land
      MDPI AG

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In South Africa, land tenure security is a challenge for 60% or more of the population who hold interests in land outside of the formal system of registered title. There is a need for the cadastral and land administration systems to be reshaped, and for new land tenure forms to be developed to record all land rights and interests so as to improve land tenure security for all. In this paper, we undertake a reflective retrospective of the processes of land administrative reform in South Africa using a thematic framework that includes fit-for-purpose, design science research, and design thinking processes. Literary sources are coded using the thematic framework to identify potential contributions of foregrounding design science research and design thinking in fit-for-purpose land administration (FFP LA) approaches. Design science research paired with tools of behavioral science add value in understanding the context, problems, needs, and objectives and in communicating the results of critical reflection. The design thinking process has much to offer in capitalizing on the human abilities of empathy, deep understanding, and challenging assumptions, setting the scene for unconstrained creative thinking. Design science research and design thinking within FFP LA may promote innovations in land administration systems reform initiatives that deliver restorative justice in the South African land sector.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries

          Egon Guba (1981)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Advancing Qualitative Research Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS)? Reviewing Potential Versus Practice in Published Studies using ATLAS.ti and NVivo, 1994–2013

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Land
                Land
                MDPI AG
                2073-445X
                May 2021
                May 04 2021
                : 10
                : 5
                : 484
                Article
                10.3390/land10050484
                c3acbb38-4506-40de-b0b8-e28cb6064b44
                © 2021

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article