54
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      CD24 signalling through macrophage Siglec-10 is a new target for cancer immunotherapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary:

          Ovarian cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are among the most lethal diseases affecting women, with few targeted therapies and high rates of metastasis. Here we show that CD24 can be the dominant innate immune checkpoint in ovarian cancer and breast cancer, and is a new, promising target for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer cells are capable of evading clearance by macrophages through the overexpression of anti-phagocytic surface proteins, called “don’t eat me” signals, including CD47 1 , programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) 2 , and the beta-2 microglobulin subunit of the major histocompatibility class I complex (B2M) 3 . Monoclonal antibodies which antagonize the interaction of “don’t eat me” signals with their macrophage-expressed receptors have demonstrated therapeutic potential in several cancers 45 . However, variability in the magnitude and durability of the response to these agents has suggested the presence of additional, as yet unknown, “don’t eat me” signals. Here we demonstrate a novel role for tumor-expressed CD24 in promoting immune evasion through its interaction with the inhibitory receptor, Sialic Acid Binding Ig Like Lectin 10 (Siglec-10), expressed by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). We observe that many tumors overexpress CD24 and that TAMs express high levels of Siglec-10. Both genetic ablation of CD24 or Siglec-10, and monoclonal antibody blockade of the CD24–Siglec-10 interaction, robustly augment the phagocytosis of all CD24-expressing human tumors tested. Genetic ablation as well as therapeutic blockade of CD24 resulted in a macrophage-dependent reduction of tumor growth and extension of survival, in vivo. These data highlight CD24 as a highly-expressed, anti-phagocytic signal in several cancers and demonstrate the therapeutic potential for CD24-blockade as cancer immunotherapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          CD24 and Siglec-10 selectively repress tissue damage-induced immune responses.

          Patten recognition receptors, which recognize pathogens or components of injured cells (danger), trigger activation of the innate immune system. Whether and how the host distinguishes between danger- versus pathogen-associated molecular patterns remains unresolved. We report that CD24-deficient mice exhibit increased susceptibility to danger- but not pathogen-associated molecular patterns. CD24 associates with high mobility group box 1, heat shock protein 70, and heat shock protein 90; negatively regulates their stimulatory activity; and inhibits nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) activation. This occurs at least in part through CD24 association with Siglec-10 in humans or Siglec-G in mice. Our results reveal that the CD24-Siglec G pathway protects the host against a lethal response to pathological cell death and discriminates danger- versus pathogen-associated molecular patterns.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Engagement of MHC class I by the inhibitory receptor LILRB1 suppresses macrophages and is a target of cancer immunotherapy

            Exciting progress in the field of cancer immunotherapy has renewed the urgency of the need for basic studies of immunoregulation in both adaptive cell lineages and innate cell lineages. Here we found a central role for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I in controlling the phagocytic function of macrophages. Our results demonstrated that expression of the common MHC class I component β2-microglobulin (β2M) by cancer cells directly protected them from phagocytosis. We further showed that this protection was mediated by the inhibitory receptor LILRB1, whose expression was upregulated on the surface of macrophages, including tumor-associated macrophages. Disruption of either MHC class I or LILRB1 potentiated phagocytosis of tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo, which defines the MHC class I-LILRB1 signaling axis as an important regulator of the effector function of innate immune cells, a potential biomarker for therapeutic response to agents directed against the signal-regulatory protein CD47 and a potential target of anti-cancer immunotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Induction of Siglec-G by RNA viruses inhibits the innate immune response by promoting RIG-I degradation.

              RIG-I is a critical RNA virus sensor that serves to initiate antiviral innate immunity. However, posttranslational regulation of RIG-I signaling remains to be fully understood. We report here that RNA viruses, but not DNA viruses or bacteria, specifically upregulate lectin family member Siglecg expression in macrophages by RIG-I- or NF-κB-dependent mechanisms. Siglec-G-induced recruitment of SHP2 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl to RIG-I leads to RIG-I degradation via K48-linked ubiquitination at Lys813 by c-Cbl. By increasing type I interferon production, targeted inactivation of Siglecg protects mice against lethal RNA virus infection. Taken together, our data reveal a negative feedback loop of RIG-I signaling and identify a Siglec-G-mediated immune evasion pathway exploited by RNA viruses with implication in antiviral applications. These findings also provide insights into the functions and crosstalk of Siglec-G, a known adaptive response regulator, in innate immunity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                24 July 2019
                31 July 2019
                August 2019
                31 January 2020
                : 572
                : 7769
                : 392-396
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
                [2 ]Ludwig Center for Cancer Stem Cell Research and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
                [3 ]Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
                [4 ]Stanford Medical Scientist Training Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
                [5 ]Departments of Bioengineering and Applied Physics, Stanford University and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
                [6 ]Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
                [7 ]Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA 94305, USA
                [8 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
                [9 ]Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
                [10 ]Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA 94305, USA
                Author notes

                Author contributions:

                A.A.B. wrote the manuscript. A.A.B and I.L.W. conceived of and designed all experiments. A.A.B., R.E.B., and M.M. performed all flow cytometry analyses, generated human macrophages, and performed in vitro phagocytosis assays. A.A.B, R.E.B., and M.M. performed in vivo experiments and S.A.B. assisted with in vivo phagocytosis measurements. B.Z. assisted with the design of neuraminidase experiments. M.K. performed single cell RNA-sequencing analysis. J.H. assisted with live-cell microscopy. L.J.B. assisted with statistical analysis and manuscript preparation. O.D. and V.K. provided primary human ovarian cancer samples. I.L.W. supervised the research and edited the manuscript.

                [* ]Materials & Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Irving L. Weissman ( irv@ 123456stanford.edu ).
                Article
                NIHMS1533560
                10.1038/s41586-019-1456-0
                6697206
                31367043
                c34db20f-e2fd-491d-a89b-505d735bb539

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article