23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    2
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of urban waterfront park landscape elements on visual behavior and public preference: Evidence from eye-tracking experiments

      , ,
      Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades.

          We frequently reposition our gaze by making rapid ballistic eye movements that are called saccades. Saccades pose problems for the visual system, because they generate rapid, large-field motion on the retina and change the relationship between the object position in external space and the image position on the retina. The brain must ignore the one and compensate for the other. Much progress has been made in recent years in understanding the effects of saccades on visual function and elucidating the mechanisms responsible for them. Evidence suggests that saccades trigger two distinct neural processes: (1) a suppression of visual sensitivity, specific to the magnocellular pathway, that dampens the sensation of motion and (2) a gross perceptual distortion of visual space in anticipation of the repositioning of gaze. Neurophysiological findings from several laboratories are beginning to identify the neural substrates involved in these effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia.

            Mental health is a public health priority globally. Public Open Space (POS) may enhance mental health by facilitating contact with nature and the development of supportive relationships. Despite growing interest in the influence of the built environment on mental health, associations between POS attributes and mental health remain relatively unexplored. In particular, few studies have examined the relative effects of the quantity and quality of POS within a neighbourhood on mental health. Guided by a social-ecological framework, this study investigated the relationship between POS attributes (i.e., quantity and quality) and better mental health (i.e., low risk of psychological distress) in residents of new housing developments in the Perth metropolitan area, Western Australia. The extent to which relationships between POS attributes and mental health were confounded by psychosocial factors (e.g., social support, sense of community) and frequent use of POS was also explored. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey (n = 911), a POS audit, and Geographical Information Systems, and was analysed using logistic regression. Approximately 80% of survey participants were at low risk of psychological distress. Residents of neighbourhoods with high quality POS had higher odds of low psychosocial distress than residents of neighbourhoods with low quality POS. This appeared to be irrespective of whether or not they used POS. However, the quantity of neighbourhood POS was not associated with low psychological distress. From a mental health perspective, POS quality within a neighbourhood appears to be more important than POS quantity. This finding has policy implications and warrants further investigation. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Is love for green in our genes? A critical analysis of evolutionary assumptions in restorative environments research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
                Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
                Elsevier BV
                16188667
                April 2023
                April 2023
                : 82
                : 127889
                Article
                10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127889
                c348a815-b1f1-4726-bde1-3cddf4c5d862
                © 2023

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article