Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of condylar anatomy and degenerative changes in temporomandibular joint disorders – A scoping review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a group of conditions that cause pain and dysfunction in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and muscles that control mandibular movement. In most cases, the etiology is unclear and is considered multifactorial. Recent research suggests that some forms of TMD could be associated with specific TMJ morphological characteristics. This study aims to provide a review of the reported anatomical and degenerative morphological condylar characteristics of subjects with a clinical diagnosis of TMD as described with the use of CBCT imaging, as well as the detection of potential predisposing anatomical factors. This review was developed and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. A comprehensive search was performed in five databases. Reports were screened by two independent reviewers based on preselected inclusion and exclusion criteria. 45 studies were included in this review. The most frequently reported degenerative changes associated with TMD were condylar surface erosion, flattening, osteophytes, and sclerosis. Anatomical characteristics included a small condylar size and a posterior position of the condylar head in the TMJ. The anterosuperior area of the condylar head appears to be the most frequently affected. More studies are required to determine potential specific predisposing anatomical characteristics.

          Graphical abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings.

              The aim of this study was to summarize and systematically review the literature on the prevalence of different research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) version 1.0 axis I diagnoses in patient and in the general populations. For each of the relevant papers, the following data/information were recorded for meta-analysis and discussion: sample size and demographic features (mean age, female-to-male ratio); prevalence of the assigned diagnoses; prevalence of the diagnoses assigned to the left and right joints, if available; prevalence of the diagnoses assigned to the 2 genders, if available; prevalence of the different combinations of multiple diagnoses, if available; and prevalence of TMD (only for community studies). Twenty-one (n = 21) papers were included in the review (15 dealing with TMD patient populations and 6 with community samples). The studies on TMD patients accounted for a total of 3,463 subjects (mean age 30.2-39.4 years, female-to-male ratio 3.3), with overall prevalences of 45.3% for group I muscle disorder diagnoses, 41.1% for group II disc displacements, and 30.1% for group III joint disorders. Studies on general populations accounted for a total of 2,491 subjects, with an overall 9.7% prevalence for group I, 11.4% for group IIa, and 2.6% for group IIIa diagnoses. Prevalence reports were highly variable across studies. Myofascial pain with or without mouth opening limitation was the commonest diagnosis in TMD patient populations, and disc displacement with reduction was the commonest diagnosis in community samples. Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Oral Biol Craniofac Res
                J Oral Biol Craniofac Res
                Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
                Elsevier
                2212-4268
                2212-4276
                06 November 2023
                Nov-Dec 2023
                06 November 2023
                : 13
                : 6
                : 764-780
                Affiliations
                [a ]Roseman University of Health Sciences College of Dental Medicine, 10894 S River Front Pkwy, South Jordan, UT, 84095, USA
                [b ]Roseman University of Health Sciences Advanced Education in Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 4 Sunset Way Bldg B, Henderson, NV, 89014, USA
                [c ]Roseman University of Health Sciences Library, 11 Sunset Way, Henderson, NV, 89014, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Roseman University of Health Sciences College of Dental Medicine, 10894 S River Front Pkwy, South Jordan, UT, 84095, USA. nalmpani@ 123456roseman.edu
                [1]

                Present address: Morgan Library, Colorado State University, 1201 Center Ave Mall, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA; Email: Anna.Ferri@colostate.edu

                Article
                S2212-4268(23)00120-3
                10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.10.004
                10665941
                38028230
                c3162562-e9fc-447f-85d5-291278e3d07d

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 25 April 2023
                : 5 September 2023
                : 12 October 2023
                Categories
                Article

                temporomandibular joint disorder,tmd,condylar anatomy,condylar morphology

                Comments

                Comment on this article