11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A review of results after implantation of a secondary intraocular lens to correct residual refractive error after cataract surgery

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The purpose of this study was to provide clinical outcomes data related to secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for the correction of residual refractive error after cataract surgery.

          Patients and methods

          A chart review was conducted to identify all eyes implanted with the monofocal spherical or toric AddOn ® secondary IOL. Data were collated from charts where uncomplicated initial cataract surgery was completed. Measures of interest included the original IOL implanted, the postoperative refractive error (before secondary IOL implantation) and the associated corrected and uncorrected visual acuities (VAs). Postoperative data of interest included the residual refractive error, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA).

          Results

          Refractive and VA data from 1 week to 3 months post-surgery were available for 46 of 70 eyes implanted with a secondary IOL by one surgeon at one practice between 4/15 and 3/17. There was a statistically significant improvement in UCVA of about 2 lines after surgery ( p<0.01), with no change in BCVA ( p=0.94). No eyes lost a line of BCVA. There was a statistically significant reduction in the absolute magnitude of the residual spherical equivalent refractive error ( p<0.01). In the 10 cases with a toric secondary IOL, there was a statistically significant reduction in refractive cylinder ( p<0.01).

          Conclusion

          The secondary IOL studied here appears to be a viable surgical option to correct residual refractive error after primary IOL implantation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Femtosecond laser for residual refractive error correction after refractive lens exchange with multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

          To assess visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond laser for residual refractive error correction after refractive lens exchange (RLE) with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Prospective, nonrandomized, masked observational case series (self-controlled). Fifty-three eyes of 31 consecutive patients were submitted to femtosecond laser surgery after RLE with multifocal IOL implantation. Patients showed an average manifest refractive error (D) of M, 0.200 +/- 0.490; J(0), -0.051 +/- 0.532; and J45, -0.007 +/- 0.371. Visual acuity (VA) was measured at distance and near vision before and six months after the surgery. At six months after surgery, mean uncorrected VA was 0.83 +/- 0.20 and improved in 100% of the eyes. No eye lost two or more lines of best-corrected distance VA; five eyes lost one line, 31 eyes did not change after the surgery, 13 eyes gained one line, and four eyes gained two lines. All eyes were within +/- 1.00 diopters (D) and 96.2% were within +/- 0.50 D of the desired refraction. The average manifest refractive error (D) after surgery was M, 0.014 +/- 0.170; J0, 0.029 +/- 0.118; and J45, 0.007 +/- 0.061. No eye lost two or more line of best distance-corrected near VA; two eyes lost one line, 40 eyes did not change, and 11 eyes gained one line. Mean uncorrected distance near VA was 0.88 +/- 0.12 at six months. Best distance-corrected near VA changed from 0.89 +/- 0.14 before surgery to 0.90 +/- 0.13 at six months. Femtosecond laser after RLE with multifocal IOL implantation is an effective procedure for correcting residual ametropia and resulted in better distance visual outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            New supplementary intraocular lens for refractive enhancement in pseudophakic patients.

            To assess the efficacy and safety of implanting a secondary intraocular lens (IOL) in the ciliary sulcus to correct pseudophakic ametropia.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Retreatments after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: an analysis

              Purpose To determine the incidence and etiology of required retreatment after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and to evaluate the methods and clinical outcomes of retreatment. Patients and methods A retrospective chart review of 416 eyes of 209 patients from one site that underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery with multifocal IOL implantation. Biometry, the IOL, and refractive data were recorded after the original implantation, with the same data recorded after retreatment. Comments related to vision were obtained both before and after retreatment for retreated patients. Results The multifocal retreatment rate was 10.8% (45/416 eyes). The eyes that required retreatment had significantly higher residual refractive astigmatism compared with those who did not require retreatment (1.21±0.51 D vs 0.51±0.39 D, P<0.01). The retreatment rate for the two most commonly implanted primary IOLs, blended bifocal (10.5%, 16/152) and bilateral trifocal (6.9%, 14/202) IOLs, was not statistically significantly different (P=0.12). In those requiring retreatment, refractive-related complaints were most common. Retreatment with refractive corneal surgery, in 11% of the eyes, and piggyback IOLs, in 89% of the eyes, was similarly successful, improving patient complaints 78% of the time. Conclusion Complaints related to ametropia were the main reasons for retreatment. Residual astigmatism appears to be an important determinant of retreatment rate after multifocal IOL implantation. Retreatment can improve symptoms for a high percentage of patients; a piggyback IOL is a viable retreatment option.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Ophthalmol
                Clin Ophthalmol
                Clinical Ophthalmology
                Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
                Dove Medical Press
                1177-5467
                1177-5483
                2017
                03 October 2017
                : 11
                : 1791-1796
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Ifocus Øyeklinikk AS, Haugesund, Norway
                [2 ]Science in Vision, Akron, NY, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Kjell Gunnar Gundersen, Ifocus Øyeklinikk AS, Sørhauggata, 111, 5527 Haugesund, Norway, Tel +47 52 80 8900, Email kg@ 123456ifocus.no
                Article
                opth-11-1791
                10.2147/OPTH.S144675
                5633306
                29042749
                c293155e-b986-46fa-b344-2840eeb769ad
                © 2017 Gundersen and Potvin. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                addon,piggyback,toric,astigmatism,multifocal,secondary iol
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                addon, piggyback, toric, astigmatism, multifocal, secondary iol

                Comments

                Comment on this article