13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Association Between Exposure to COVID-19 and Mental Health Outcomes Among Healthcare Workers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Due to the unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care systems, there has been great interest in the mental wellbeing of healthcare workers. While most studies investigated mental health outcomes among frontline vs. non-frontline healthcare workers, little is known about the impact of various work-related variables. The present study aimed to examine the association between work-related [i.e., having contact with COVID-19 patients, being redeployed due to the pandemic and availability of sufficient personal protective equipment (PPE)] and subjective (i.e., worries about getting infected or infecting others) exposures and self-reported mental health outcomes (i.e., psychological distress, depressive symptoms, and posttraumatic stress symptoms). Between February and May 2021, 994 healthcare workers employed at a variety of healthcare settings in the Netherlands filled out an online survey as part of the COVID-19 HEalth caRe wOrkErS (HEROES) study. Mental health outcomes were measured using the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5. Approximately 13% reported depressive symptoms, 37% experienced psychological distress, and 20% reported posttraumatic stress symptoms. Multilevel linear models consisted of three levels: individual (work-related and subjective exposures), healthcare center (aggregated redeployment and availability of sufficient PPE), and regional (cumulative COVID-19 infection and death rates). Worries about infection were associated with all three mental health outcomes, whereas insufficient PPE was associated with psychological distress and depressive symptoms. There were no differences in outcomes between healthcare centers or provinces with different COVID-19 infection and death rates. Our findings highlight the importance of adequate PPE provision and the subjective experience of the COVID-19 pandemic. These factors should be part of interventions aimed at mitigating adverse mental health outcomes among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

          While considerable attention has focused on improving the detection of depression, assessment of severity is also important in guiding treatment decisions. Therefore, we examined the validity of a brief, new measure of depression severity. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). The PHQ-9 was completed by 6,000 patients in 8 primary care clinics and 7 obstetrics-gynecology clinics. Construct validity was assessed using the 20-item Short-Form General Health Survey, self-reported sick days and clinic visits, and symptom-related difficulty. Criterion validity was assessed against an independent structured mental health professional (MHP) interview in a sample of 580 patients. As PHQ-9 depression severity increased, there was a substantial decrease in functional status on all 6 SF-20 subscales. Also, symptom-related difficulty, sick days, and health care utilization increased. Using the MHP reinterview as the criterion standard, a PHQ-9 score > or =10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represented mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively. Results were similar in the primary care and obstetrics-gynecology samples. In addition to making criteria-based diagnoses of depressive disorders, the PHQ-9 is also a reliable and valid measure of depression severity. These characteristics plus its brevity make the PHQ-9 a useful clinical and research tool.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health in the General Population: A Systematic Review

            Highlights • The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in unprecedented hazards to mental health globally. • Relatively high rates of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological distress, and stress were reported in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic in eight countries. • Common risk factors associated with mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic include female gender, younger age group (≤40 years), presence of chronic/psychiatric illnesses, unemployment, student status, and frequent exposure to social media/news concerning COVID-19. • Mitigation of COVID-19 induced psychological distress requires government intervention and individual efforts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                10 June 2022
                2022
                10 June 2022
                : 10
                : 896843
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Parnassia Groep, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute , The Hague, Netherlands
                [2] 2Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [3] 3University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center of Psychiatry , Groningen, Netherlands
                [4] 4Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University , New York, NY, United States
                [5] 5Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [6] 6Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht, Netherlands
                [7] 7Academic Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [8] 8Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute , New York, NY, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Rahul Shidhaye, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, India

                Reviewed by: Ivana Stasevic Karlicic, Clinic for Mental Disorders “Dr Laza Lazarevic”, Serbia; Ameya Prasad Bondre, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India

                *Correspondence: Els van der Ven e.m.a.vander.ven@ 123456vu.nl

                This article was submitted to Public Mental Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2022.896843
                9226479
                35757645
                c27625ef-caf6-41b5-a740-2f447edaad58
                Copyright © 2022 Czepiel, Hoek, van der Markt, Rutten, Veling, Schirmbeck, Mascayano, Susser and van der Ven.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 15 March 2022
                : 06 May 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 57, Pages: 11, Words: 8885
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research

                covid-19,depression,healthcare workers (hcws),mental health,personal protective equipment (ppe),posttraumatic stress,psychological distress

                Comments

                Comment on this article