13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Flupyradifurone reduces nectar consumption and foraging but does not alter honey bee recruitment dancing.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Foraging is essential for honey bee colony fitness and is enhanced by the waggle dance, a recruitment behavior in which bees can communicate food location and quality. We tested if the consumption of nectar (sucrose solution) with a field-realistic concentration of 4 ppm flupyradifurone (FPF) could alter foraging behavior and recruitment dancing in Apis mellifera. Foragers were repelled by FPF. They visited the FPF feeder less often and spent less time imbibing sucrose solution (2.5 M, 65% w/w) with FPF. As a result, bees feeding on the FPF treatment consumed 16% less nectar. However, FPF did not affect dancing: there were no effects on unloading wait time, the number of dance bouts per nest visit, or the number of dance circuits performed per dance bout. FPF could therefore deter bees from foraging on contaminated nectar. However, the willingness of bees to recruit nestmates for nectar with FPF is concerning. Recruitment can rapidly amplify the number of foragers and could overcome the decrease in consumption of FPF-contaminated nectar, resulting in a net inflow of pesticide to the colony. FPF also significantly altered the expression of 116 genes, some of which may be relevant for the olfactory learning deficits induced by FPF and the toxicity of FPF.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Ecotoxicol Environ Saf
          Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
          Elsevier BV
          1090-2414
          0147-6513
          Jan 01 2021
          : 207
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Institute of Apicultural Research Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China. Electronic address: wuyanyan@caas.cn.
          [2 ] UCSD Division of Biological Sciences Section of Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: ppasberg@web.de.
          [3 ] Institute of Apicultural Research Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China. Electronic address: dqyun1@126.com.
          [4 ] UCSD Division of Biological Sciences Section of Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: jnieh@ucsd.edu.
          Article
          S0147-6513(20)31106-4
          10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111268
          32916533
          c25c402f-d52a-46c5-a794-0946edf67035
          Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
          History

          Anti-feedant,Apis mellifera,Communication,Recruitment,Sublethal effects,Waggle dancing

          Comments

          Comment on this article