4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Prior shared success predicts victory in team competitions

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance.

          Agents in creative enterprises are embedded in networks that inspire, support, and evaluate their work. Here, we investigate how the mechanisms by which creative teams self-assemble determine the structure of these collaboration networks. We propose a model for the self-assembly of creative teams that has its basis in three parameters: team size, the fraction of newcomers in new productions, and the tendency of incumbents to repeat previous collaborations. The model suggests that the emergence of a large connected community of practitioners can be described as a phase transition. We find that team assembly mechanisms determine both the structure of the collaboration network and team performance for teams derived from both artistic and scientific fields.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust.

              The authors report results from 5 experiments that describe the influence of emotional states on trust. They found that incidental emotions significantly influence trust in unrelated settings. Happiness and gratitude--emotions with positive valence--increase trust, and anger--an emotion with negative valence--decreases trust. Specifically, they found that emotions characterized by other-person control (anger and gratitude) and weak control appraisals (happiness) influence trust significantly more than emotions characterized by personal control (pride and guilt) or situational control (sadness). These findings suggest that emotions are more likely to be misattributed when the appraisals of the emotion are consistent with the judgment task than when the appraisals of the emotion are inconsistent with the judgment task. Emotions do not influence trust when individuals are aware of the source of their emotions or when individuals are very familiar with the trustee. 2005 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nature Human Behaviour
                Nat Hum Behav
                Springer Nature
                2397-3374
                December 3 2018
                Article
                10.1038/s41562-018-0460-y
                30932038
                c237b23a-6dc2-49ef-8904-505b06251e9f
                © 2018

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article