10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Social representations of coronavirus/COVID-19 in Italy: Psychosocial anchoring to conspiracy beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, and the psychological dimension

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          From the societal approach of the Theory of Social Representations, this study aimed to investigate the social representations of coronavirus/COVID-19 among the Italian population. By means of an online questionnaire, 599 individuals participated in the research, with a mean age of 38.09 years (SD = 14.44), 62.1% being women. The instrument was composed of sociodemographic questions, free association technique for the inductive term “coronavirus/COVID-19” and scales on conspiracy beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, and psychological dimension. The results allowed us to identify four social representations: “Citizens driven by Social Representations anchored to factual Covid-19 pandemic data,” with lower vaccine hesitancy and conspiracy beliefs, and greater faith in science; “Citizens with low confidence in anti-pandemic preventive measures by government,” with lower agreement with restriction measures; “Emotional people,” with higher agreement with restriction measures and expression of psychological distress; and “Minority group of Citizens driven by denial of Covid-19,” with higher vaccine hesitancy and conspiracy beliefs. We discuss the different social representations identified from the psychological and psychosocial anchoring processes in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19

          Vaccine hesitancy remains a barrier to full population inoculation against highly infectious diseases. Coincident with the rapid developments of COVID-19 vaccines globally, concerns about the safety of such a vaccine could contribute to vaccine hesitancy. We analyzed 1941 anonymous questionnaires completed by healthcare workers and members of the general Israeli population, regarding acceptance of a potential COVID-19 vaccine. Our results indicate that healthcare staff involved in the care of COVID-19 positive patients, and individuals considering themselves at risk of disease, were more likely to self-report acquiescence to COVID-19 vaccination if and when available. In contrast, parents, nurses, and medical workers not caring for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients expressed higher levels of vaccine hesitancy. Interventional educational campaigns targeted towards populations at risk of vaccine hesitancy are therefore urgently needed to combat misinformation and avoid low inoculation rates.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              COVID-19–Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis

              Abstract. Infodemics, often including rumors, stigma, and conspiracy theories, have been common during the COVID-19 pandemic. Monitoring social media data has been identified as the best method for tracking rumors in real time and as a possible way to dispel misinformation and reduce stigma. However, the detection, assessment, and response to rumors, stigma, and conspiracy theories in real time are a challenge. Therefore, we followed and examined COVID-19–related rumors, stigma, and conspiracy theories circulating on online platforms, including fact-checking agency websites, Facebook, Twitter, and online newspapers, and their impacts on public health. Information was extracted between December 31, 2019 and April 5, 2020, and descriptively analyzed. We performed a content analysis of the news articles to compare and contrast data collected from other sources. We identified 2,311 reports of rumors, stigma, and conspiracy theories in 25 languages from 87 countries. Claims were related to illness, transmission and mortality (24%), control measures (21%), treatment and cure (19%), cause of disease including the origin (15%), violence (1%), and miscellaneous (20%). Of the 2,276 reports for which text ratings were available, 1,856 claims were false (82%). Misinformation fueled by rumors, stigma, and conspiracy theories can have potentially serious implications on the individual and community if prioritized over evidence-based guidelines. Health agencies must track misinformation associated with the COVID-19 in real time, and engage local communities and government stakeholders to debunk misinformation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                PAC
                sppac
                Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1834-4909
                1 February 2022
                2022
                1 February 2022
                : 16
                : 18344909221074469
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Education Studies “Giovanni Maria Bertin”—EDU, Ringgold 9296, universityUniversity of Bologna; , Bologna, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Ringgold 28126, universityFederal University of Espírito Santo; , Vitória, Brazil
                [3 ]Department of Social Sciences, Social Psychology, Ringgold 4344, universityUniversity of Eastern Finland; , Kuopio, Finland
                [4 ]Department of Human and Social Sciences, Ringgold 18953, universityUniversity of Bergamo; , Bergamo, Italy
                Author notes
                [*]Giannino Melotti, Department of Education Studies “Giovanni Maria Bertin”—EDU, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy. Email: giannino.melotti@ 123456unibo.it
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6452-1679
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4828-2276
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8378-2911
                Article
                10.1177_18344909221074469
                10.1177/18344909221074469
                8814431
                c1ea5e67-2669-4a1b-af5b-0162e9ed97bb
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 12 November 2021
                : 27 December 2021
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                ts19
                January-December 2022

                emotional dimension,conspiracy beliefs,coronavirus,covid-19,social representations,vaccine hesitancy

                Comments

                Comment on this article