38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Standalone smartphone apps for mental health—a systematic review and meta-analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While smartphone usage is ubiquitous, and the app market for smartphone apps targeted at mental health is growing rapidly, the evidence of standalone apps for treating mental health symptoms is still unclear. This meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of standalone smartphone apps for mental health. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in February 2018 on randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of standalone apps for mental health in adults with heightened symptom severity, compared to a control group. A random-effects model was employed. When insufficient comparisons were available, data was presented in a narrative synthesis. Outcomes included assessments of mental health disorder symptom severity specifically targeted at by the app. In total, 5945 records were identified and 165 full-text articles were screened for inclusion by two independent researchers. Nineteen trials with 3681 participants were included in the analysis: depression ( k = 6), anxiety ( k = 4), substance use ( k = 5), self-injurious thoughts and behaviors ( k = 4), PTSD ( k = 2), and sleep problems ( k = 2). Effects on depression (Hedges’ g = 0.33, 95%CI 0.10–0.57, P = 0.005, NNT = 5.43, I 2 = 59%) and on smoking behavior ( g = 0.39, 95%CI 0.21–0.57, NNT = 4.59, P ≤ 0.001, I 2 = 0%) were significant. No significant pooled effects were found for anxiety, suicidal ideation, self-injury, or alcohol use ( g = −0.14 to 0.18). Effect sizes for single trials ranged from g = −0.05 to 0.14 for PTSD and g = 0.72 to 0.84 for insomnia. Although some trials showed potential of apps targeting mental health symptoms, using smartphone apps as standalone psychological interventions cannot be recommended based on the current level of evidence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

          The rapid advances and adoption of smartphone technology presents a novel opportunity for delivering mental health interventions on a population scale. Despite multi-sector investment along with wide-scale advertising and availability to the general population, the evidence supporting the use of smartphone apps in the treatment of depression has not been empirically evaluated. Thus, we conducted the first meta-analysis of smartphone apps for depressive symptoms. An electronic database search in May 2017 identified 18 eligible randomized controlled trials of 22 smartphone apps, with outcome data from 3,414 participants. Depressive symptoms were reduced significantly more from smartphone apps than control conditions (g=0.38, 95% CI: 0.24-0.52, p<0.001), with no evidence of publication bias. Smartphone interventions had a moderate positive effect in comparison to inactive controls (g=0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.74), but only a small effect in comparison to active control conditions (g=0.22, 95% CI: 0.10-0.33). Effects from smartphone-only interventions were greater than from interventions which incorporated other human/computerized aspects along the smartphone component, although the difference was not statistically significant. The studies of cognitive training apps had a significantly smaller effect size on depression outcomes (p=0.004) than those of apps focusing on mental health. The use of mood monitoring softwares, or interventions based on cognitive behavioral therapy, or apps incorporating aspects of mindfulness training, did not affect significantly study effect sizes. Overall, these results indicate that smartphone devices are a promising self-management tool for depression. Future research should aim to distil which aspects of these technologies produce beneficial effects, and for which populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Can smartphone mental health interventions reduce symptoms of anxiety? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

              Various psychological interventions are effective for reducing symptoms of anxiety when used alone, or as an adjunct to anti-anxiety medications. Recent studies have further indicated that smartphone-supported psychological interventions may also reduce anxiety, although the role of mobile devices in the treatment and management of anxiety disorders has yet to be established.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kiona.weisel@fau.de
                Journal
                NPJ Digit Med
                NPJ Digit Med
                NPJ Digital Medicine
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2398-6352
                2 December 2019
                2 December 2019
                2019
                : 2
                : 118
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2107 3311, GRID grid.5330.5, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, ; Erlangen, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9748, GRID grid.6582.9, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, , University of Ulm, ; Ulm, Germany
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1754 9227, GRID grid.12380.38, Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, , Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0435 165X, GRID grid.16872.3a, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1800-0044
                Article
                188
                10.1038/s41746-019-0188-8
                6889400
                31815193
                c1d9e161-743b-4e2e-8536-a903738715e8
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 7 May 2019
                : 24 October 2019
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                psychology,outcomes research,human behaviour
                psychology, outcomes research, human behaviour

                Comments

                Comment on this article