Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Five Things to Know About Intradialytic Hypertension

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          1. Intradialytic hypertension is a paradoxical rise in blood pressure (BP) that occurs specifically during the hemodialysis (HD) procedure. There are no accepted criteria that define intradialytic hypertension, but several definitions exist: An increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) >10 mm Hg during HD (most common definition). 1 Rise in the mean arterial pressure >15 mmHg during or immediately post-HD. 2 Any BP rise during HD. 3 2. Persistent intradialytic hypertension is common and is associated with poor prognostic factors and increased mortality. Persistent intradialytic hypertension (>10 mm Hg rise in SBP) is reported to occur in 15% to 30% of patients treated with HD, 2,4 and is associated with twofold to fourfold increased risks of hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. 5,6 Whether these relationships are causal is not certain, as intradialytic hypertension tends to occur in patients with markers of more severe illness, including older age, lower serum albumin, lower kT/V, lower body mass index, and greater use of antihypertensive medications. 7 Persistent intradialytic hypertension is likely a marker of cardiovascular risk and vascular stiffness. 3 3. Patients with intradialytic hypertension often have high ambulatory BP between dialysis sessions, but this is not universal. Intradialytic BPs are highly correlated with ambulatory BP between HD sessions, suggesting that patients with intradialytic hypertension are also likely to have uncontrolled ambulatory hypertension. 8 4. The causes of intradialytic hypertension are complex and not yet fully elucidated. Intradialytic hypertension has been observed with equal frequency in patients with normal, low- and high-volume status by bioimpedance, 4 suggesting volume overload is not the only factor. Factors that increase total peripheral resistance appear to be important, especially in patients with underlying vascular stiffness (Figure 1). Contributing factors thus include volume overload, 1 sympathetic overactivity, 9 renin angiotensin aldosterone system, 10 endothelial dysfunction and relative increase in endothelin 1 to nitric oxide, 11 administration of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) during dialysis, 12 and sodium loading during dialysis. 13 5. Several strategies have been proposed but strong evidence is lacking: Optimize the treatment of essential hypertension. This includes carefully reassessing the target weight, 15 the use of appropriate antihypertensives such as beta blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers (see below) and ensuring medication adherence. Extended hours 16 or frequent HD 17 may also be considered when circumstances permit. Consider using a beta blocker with additional alpha blockade activity, such as carvedilol. In a prospective 12-week pilot study of carvedilol titrated to 50 mg twice daily in 25 patients with intradialytic hypertension, carvedilol was associated with modest improvements in endothelial function, improved BP between dialysis sessions, and reduced frequency of intradialytic hypertension. 18 Consider giving a short acting antihypertensive agent prior to the hemodialysis session. Certain antihypertensives such as captopril and hydralazine have rapid onset and offset and may be used to prevent intradialytic hypertension while not causing hypotension in between dialysis sessions. 19 Choose antihypertensives that are less dialyzable. Angiotensin converting enzymes, except for fosinopril, are highly dialyzable, whereas all angiotensin receptor blockers are non-dialyzable. Commonly used beta blockers such as metoprolol and atenolol are highly dialyzable 20 while bisoprolol is moderately dialyzable and carvedilol is the least dialyzable. 20 Nebivolol, another non-dialyzable beta-blocker, and irbesartan were effective in reducing intradialytic hypertension in one randomized trial. 21 Consider lowering dialysate sodium. In a small pre-post study (n = 50), reducing the dialysate sodium from 140 mmol/L to 136 mmol/L led to significantly lower third hour and post-HD SBP. 22 Avoid high calcium dialysate. As there is an association between lower calcium dialysate and lower post-HD systolic BP, 23 a low-calcium dialysate is sometimes recommended to treat intradialytic hypertension. Strong evidence is lacking, however, and this approach may result in a negative calcium balance and increased risk of cardiac arrythmias. 24 Consider raising the dialysate temperature. Lowering the dialysate temperature below core temperature increase intradialytic BP, 25 while lower BPs are observed with higher dialysate temperatures. 26 Consider switching administration of ESA to the subcutaneous route. Intravenous ESA is associated with rises in mean arterial pressures 30 minutes after administration, and this effect can last up to 3 hours. Subcutaneous administration does not appear to have this effect. 27 Figure 1. Risk factors and proposed mechanisms for intradialytic hypertension. 14 Note. BP = blood pressure; ESA = erythropoiesis stimulating agents.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dry-weight reduction in hypertensive hemodialysis patients (DRIP): a randomized, controlled trial.

          Volume excess is thought to be important in the pathogenesis of hypertension among hemodialysis patients. To determine whether additional volume reduction will result in improvement in blood pressure (BP) among hypertensive patients on hemodialysis and to evaluate the time course of this response, we randomly assigned long-term hypertensive hemodialysis patients to ultrafiltration or control groups. The additional ultrafiltration group (n=100) had the dry weight probed without increasing time or duration of dialysis, whereas the control group (n=50) only had physician visits. The primary outcome was change in systolic interdialytic ambulatory BP. Postdialysis weight was reduced by 0.9 kg at 4 weeks and resulted in -6.9 mm Hg (95% CI: -12.4 to -1.3 mm Hg; P=0.016) change in systolic BP and -3.1 mm Hg (95% CI: -6.2 to -0.02 mm Hg; P=0.048) change in diastolic BP. At 8 weeks, dry weight was reduced 1 kg, systolic BP changed -6.6 mm Hg (95% CI: -12.2 to -1.0 mm Hg; P=0.021), and diastolic BP changed -3.3 mm Hg (95% CI: -6.4 to -0.2 mm Hg; P=0.037) from baseline. The Mantel-Hanzel combined odds ratio for systolic BP reduction of > or =10 mm Hg was 2.24 (95% CI: 1.32 to 3.81; P=0.003). There was no deterioration seen in any domain of the kidney disease quality of life health survey despite an increase in intradialytic signs and symptoms of hypotension. The reduction of dry weight is a simple, efficacious, and well-tolerated maneuver to improve BP control in hypertensive hemodialysis patients. Long-term control of BP will depend on continued assessment and maintenance of dry weight.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Association of intradialytic blood pressure changes with hospitalization and mortality rates in prevalent ESRD patients.

            The relationship between blood pressure (BP) and clinical outcomes among hemodialysis patients is complex and incompletely understood. This study sought to assess the relationship between blood pressure changes with hemodialysis and clinical outcomes during a 6-month period. This study is a secondary analysis of the Crit-Line Intradialytic Monitoring Benefit Study, a randomized trial of 443 hemodialysis subjects, designed to determine whether blood volume monitoring reduced hospitalization. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between BP changes with hemodialysis (Deltasystolic blood pressure=postdialysis-predialysis systoic BP (SBP) and the primary outcome of non-access-related hospitalization and death. Subjects whose systolic blood pressure fell with dialysis were younger, took fewer blood pressure medications, had higher serum creatinine, and higher dry weights. After controlling for baseline characteristics, lab variables, and treatment group, subjects whose SBP remained unchanged with hemodialysis (N=150, DeltaSBP -10 to 10 mm Hg) or whose SBP rose with hemodialysis (N=58, DeltaSBP > or =10 mm Hg) had a higher odds of hospitalization or death compared to subjects whose SBP fell with hemodialysis (N=230, DeltaSBP < or =-10 mm Hg) (odds ratio: 1.85, confidence interval: 1.15-2.98; and odds ratio: 2.17, confidence interval: 1.13-4.15). Subjects whose systolic blood pressure fell with hemodialysis had a significantly decreased risk of hospitalization or death at 6 months, suggesting that hemodynamic responses to dialysis are associated with short-term outcomes among a group of prevalent hemodialysis subjects. Further research should attempt to elucidate the mechanisms behind these findings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intradialytic hypertension: a less-recognized cardiovascular complication of hemodialysis.

              Intradialytic hypertension, defined as an increase in blood pressure during or immediately after hemodialysis that results in postdialysis hypertension, has long been recognized to complicate the hemodialysis procedure, yet often is largely ignored. In light of recent investigations suggesting that intradialytic hypertension is associated with adverse outcomes, this review broadly covers the epidemiologic characteristics, prognostic significance, potential pathogenic mechanisms, prevention, and possible treatment of intradialytic hypertension. Intradialytic hypertension affects up to 15% of hemodialysis patients and occurs more frequently in patients who are older, have lower dry weights, are prescribed more antihypertensive medications, and have lower serum creatinine levels. Recent studies associated intradialytic hypertension independently with higher hospitalization rates and decreased survival. Although the pathophysiologic mechanisms of intradialytic hypertension are uncertain, it likely is multifactorial and includes subclinical volume overload, sympathetic overactivity, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, endothelial cell dysfunction, and specific dialytic techniques. Prevention and treatment of intradialytic hypertension may include careful attention to dry weight, avoidance of dialyzable antihypertensive medications, limiting the use of high-calcium dialysate, achieving adequate sodium solute removal during hemodialysis, and using medications that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system or decrease endothelin 1 levels. In summary, although intradialytic hypertension often is underappreciated, recent studies suggest that it should not be ignored. However, further work is necessary to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of intradialytic hypertension and its appropriate management and determine whether treatment of intradialytic hypertension can improve clinical outcomes. Copyright 2010 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Can J Kidney Health Dis
                Can J Kidney Health Dis
                CJK
                spcjk
                Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2054-3581
                21 June 2022
                2022
                : 9
                : 20543581221106657
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Regina General Hospital, SK, Canada
                [2 ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
                [3 ]Division of Nephrology, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, QC, Canada
                Author notes
                [*]Bhanu Prasad, Nephrologist, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Regina General Hospital, 1440, 14th Avenue, Regina, SK S4P 0W5, Canada. Email: bprasad@ 123456sasktel.net
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1139-4821
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0519-3927
                Article
                10.1177_20543581221106657
                10.1177/20543581221106657
                9218443
                35756329
                c1891880-fc30-4840-914e-f55bbd619607
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Five Things to Know About. . .
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2022
                ts1

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content2,080

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors367