6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Smart Terrain Identification Technique Based on Electromyography, Ground Reaction Force, and Machine Learning for Lower Limb Rehabilitation

      , , ,
      Applied Sciences
      MDPI AG

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Automatic terrain classification in lower limb rehabilitation systems has gained worldwide attention. In this field, a simple system architecture and high classification accuracy are two desired attributes. In this article, a smart neuromuscular–mechanical fusion and machine learning-based terrain classification technique utilizing only two electromyography (EMG) sensors and two ground reaction force (GRF) sensors is reported for classifying three different terrains (downhill, level, and uphill). The EMG and GRF signals from ten healthy subjects were collected, preprocessed and segmented to obtain the EMG and GRF profiles in each stride, based on which twenty-one statistical features, including 9 GRF features and 12 EMG features, were extracted. A support vector machine (SVM) machine learning model is established and trained by the extracted EMG features, GRF features and the fusion of them, respectively. Several methods or statistical metrics were used to evaluate the goodness of the proposed technique, including a paired-t-test and Kruskal–Wallis test for correlation analysis of the selected features and ten-fold cross-validation accuracy, confusion matrix, sensitivity and specificity for the performance of the SVM model. The results show that the extracted features are highly correlated with the terrain changes and the fusion of the EMG and GRF features produces the highest accuracy of 96.8%. The presented technique allows simple system construction to achieve the precise detection of outcomes, potentially advancing the development of terrain classification techniques for rehabilitation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Electromyographic amplitude normalization methods: improving their sensitivity as diagnostic tools in gait analysis.

          The effect of four amplitude normalization methods on intersubject variability of electromyographic (EMG) profiles in normal gait was examined. Bipolar silver/silver chloride surface electrodes were applied to the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles of the right lower extremity, in 11 healthy subjects. The myoelectric signals were telemetered via an FM multichannel biotelemetry system, full-wave rectified and low-pass filtered, then A/D converted together with the footswitch signal. Within-subject ensemble-average patterns were generated from the linear envelope EMG of at least six strides for each subject. Each subject's ensemble average was then normalized to the following: (a) the average EMG over three 50% isometric maximum voluntary contractions (MVC), (b) the EMG per unit isometric moment of force, (c) the peak of the subject ensemble average, (d) the mean of the subject ensemble average. Intersubject variability was quantified for each of the normalization methods by the coefficient of variation (CV). The normalization to either the peak ensemble or the mean ensemble drastically reduced intersubject variability, by 12%-73%. In contrast, normalization to the average EMG during 50% MVC or to the EMG per unit moment increased intersubject variability. It was concluded that the reduction of intersubject variability by appropriate amplitude normalization is possible, thereby increasing the sensitivity of surface EMG as a diagnostic tool in gait analysis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            European Recommendations for Surface ElectroMyoGraphy

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions.

              The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of average surface electromyography (EMG) within and between days. Nine subjects were tested on three different days. Five maximum and 10 submaximum (five at each of two different levels) isometric contractions were performed each day. The submaximum levels were determined by the 30% and 50% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) on day one and kept constant over days two and three. The myoelectric signal from the triceps was full wave rectified and low-pass filtered at 1 Hz to yield a relatively noise-free average EMG that corresponded in time to the force signal. The scores were normalized to the force level. The reliability was estimated with intraclass correlations coefficients (R). The magnitude of score variation was also expressed as a ratio, coefficient of variation, CV = standard deviation/mean X 100%. R values were significantly greater for the submaximal levels than the 100% MVC; no significant difference existed between the two submaximal levels. The within-day CV values were similar for all three levels, ranging from 8% to 10%. The between-days variability was higher than that within days, ranging from 12% to 16%. The results suggest that submaximal isometric contractions are more reliable. Measurement error is substantial in this technique and should be included in statistical designs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                ASPCC7
                Applied Sciences
                Applied Sciences
                MDPI AG
                2076-3417
                April 2020
                April 11 2020
                : 10
                : 8
                : 2638
                Article
                10.3390/app10082638
                c0cec9c4-dc7c-4649-850e-3da35fdd9d3c
                © 2020

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article