29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mass Extinction and the Disappearance of Unknown Mammal Species: Scenario and Perspectives of a Biodiversity Hotspot’s Hotspot

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We aimed to determine the conservation status of medium- and large-sized mammals and evaluate the impact of 500 years of forest fragmentation on this group of animals in the Pernambuco Endemism Center, in the biogeographical zone of the Atlantic forest north of the São Francisco River in northeastern Brazil. Line transect surveys were performed in 21 forest fragments, resulting in a checklist of the mammals of the entire Pernambuco Endemism Center area. We ran a generalized linear model (Factorial ANCOVA) to analyze to what extent the vegetation type, fragment area, isolation, sampling effort (as total kilometers walked), or higher-order interactions predicted (a) richness and (b) sighting rates. To determine if the distribution of the species within the forest fragments exhibited a nested pattern, we used the NODF metric. Subsequently, we performed a Binomial Logistic Regression to predict the probability of encountering each species according to fragment size. Out of 38 medium- and large-sized mammal species formerly occurring in the study area, only 53.8% (n = 21) were sighted. No fragment hosted the entire remaining mammal community, and only four species (19%) occurred in very small fragments (73.3% of the remaining forest fragments, with a mean size of 2.8 ha). The mammalian community was highly simplified, with all large mammals being regionally extinct. Neither the species richness nor sighting rate was controlled by the vegetation type, the area of the forest fragments, isolation or any higher-order interaction. Although a highly significant nested subset pattern was detected, it was not related to the ranking of the area of forest fragments or isolation. The probability of the occurrence of a mammal species in a given forest patch varied unpredictably, and the probability of detecting larger species was even observed to decrease with increasing patch size. In an ongoing process of mass extinction, half of the studied mammals have gone extinct. The remaining medium-sized mammal community is highly simplified and homogenized. The persistence of these species in a forest patch is determined by their ability to adapt to a novel simplified diet, the efficient use of the surrounding matrix without being engulfed by the sink effect, and escaping hunting. Our results suggest that the 21 st century medium-sized mammalian fauna of this region will comprise only four species unless strict conservation measures are implemented immediately and every forest fragment is effectively protected.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis.

          There is growing concern about increased population, regional, and global extinctions of species. A key question is whether extinction rates for one group of organisms are representative of other taxa. We present a comparison at the national scale of population and regional extinctions of birds, butterflies, and vascular plants from Britain in recent decades. Butterflies experienced the greatest net losses, disappearing on average from 13% of their previously occupied 10-kilometer squares. If insects elsewhere in the world are similarly sensitive, the known global extinction rates of vertebrate and plant species have an unrecorded parallel among the invertebrates, strengthening the hypothesis that the natural world is experiencing the sixth major extinction event in its history.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Biodiversity. Extinction by numbers.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore.

              The looming mass extinction of biodiversity in the humid tropics is a major concern for the future, yet most reports of extinctions in these regions are anecdotal or conjectural, with a scarcity of robust, broad-based empirical data. Here we report on local extinctions among a wide range of terrestrial and freshwater taxa from Singapore (540 km2) in relation to habitat loss exceeding 95% over 183 years. Substantial rates of documented and inferred extinctions were found, especially for forest specialists, with the greatest proportion of extinct taxa (34-87%) in butterflies, fish, birds and mammals. Observed extinctions were generally fewer, but inferred losses often higher, in vascular plants, phasmids, decapods, amphibians and reptiles (5-80%). Forest reserves comprising only 0.25% of Singapore's area now harbour over 50% of the residual native biodiversity. Extrapolations of the observed and inferred local extinction data, using a calibrated species-area model, imply that the current unprecedented rate of habitat destruction in Southeast Asia will result in the loss of 13-42% of regional populations over the next century, at least half of which will represent global species extinctions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                18 May 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 5
                : e0150887
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Zoologia, R. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco—PE, Brazil
                [2 ]Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade—ICMBio, Estrada do Forte Orange, S/N, Caixa-postal: 01, Itamaraca, Pernambuco—PE, Brazil
                [3 ]Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Zoologia, R. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco—PE, Brazil
                [4 ]Instituto Tecnológico do Estado de Pernambuco–ITEP, Avenida Professor Luiz Freire, 500—Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco—PE, Brazil
                [5 ]Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Núcleo de Biologia–Centro Acadêmico de Vitória, UFPE. Rua do Alto do Reservatório, S/N, Bela Vista, Vitória de Santo Antão, PE, Brazil
                Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, INDIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: ARMP. Performed the experiments: ARMP ACMB ICN AJRM APSJ. Analyzed the data: ARMP AMMS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ARMP AMMS. Wrote the paper: ARMP. Old literature search: ACMB.

                [¤]

                Current address: Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia—INPA, Núcleo de Pesquisas de Roraima, Rua Coronel Pinto, 315, Centro, Boa Vista, Roraima—RR, Brazil

                Article
                PONE-D-15-36695
                10.1371/journal.pone.0150887
                4871537
                27191719
                c07405cf-13c4-4e6f-8414-5087a1dfe95e
                © 2016 Mendes Pontes et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 21 August 2015
                : 19 February 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 8, Pages: 26
                Funding
                This work was supported by Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à Natureza grant number 0522_20012: ARMP. National Research Council (CNPq), Probiota program (PROBIO) grant 680037/02-0: ARMP ICN. Conservation International—Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF): ARMP. Brazilian Post-Graduate Council (CAPES): APSJ.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Conservation Biology
                Species Extinction
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Conservation Biology
                Species Extinction
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Processes
                Species Extinction
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Terrestrial Environments
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Species Colonization
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Scientists
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Cats
                Pumas
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Forest Ecology
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Forest Ecology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Species Diversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Species Diversity
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content11

                Cited by14

                Most referenced authors456