0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The contemporary management of perforated appendicitis in adults: To operate or wait?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The optimal management of perforated appendicitis remains controversial. Many studies advocate for antibiotics and an interval appendectomy whereas others suggest that performing an appendectomy at the time of presentation decreases post-operative morbidity. Confounding this argument further are the patients who fail non-operative management and end up requiring surgery during their initial hospitalization. This study aims to determine if early operative intervention should be considered for perforated appendicitis.

          Methods

          This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent an appendectomy (both laparoscopic or open) for perforated appendicitis between 2015 and 2020 at our institution.

          Results

          A total of 271 patients met inclusion criteria for this study. Of this group, 250 patients underwent an immediate appendectomy whereas the remaining 21 patients underwent a trial of non-operative management and eventually required an appendectomy during their initial admission. When comparing the immediate versus delayed operative groups, there were no differences in demographic data including age and gender, and no differences in various imaging findings including AAST Grade IV or V appendicitis. Operatively, patients in the delayed group had a longer operative time (83.1 ± 32.9 vs. 64.1 ± 26.2, p = 0.01), were more likely to require an open operation (23.8 % vs. 2.8 %, p < 0.0001), and were more likely to have a drain placed intra-operatively (42.9 % vs 14.4 %, p = 0.004). While there were no differences in 30-day readmission rates, patients in the delayed group had a significantly longer hospital length of stay than patients in the immediate group (9.4 ± 7.4 vs. 3.1 ± 3.3, p = 0.008).

          Conclusions

          Patients undergoing an immediate appendectomy for perforated appendicitis can discharge from the hospital sooner and demonstrate no increase in post-operative morbidity suggesting that surgeons can initially manage this disease process in an operative fashion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis

          (2020)
          Antibiotic therapy has been proposed as an alternative to surgery for the treatment of appendicitis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            A systematic review of the nonsurgical treatment of patients with appendiceal abscess or phlegmon, with emphasis on the success rate, need for drainage of abscesses, risk of undetected serious disease, and need for interval appendectomy to prevent recurrence. Patients with appendiceal abscess or phlegmon are traditionally managed by nonsurgical treatment and interval appendectomy. This practice is controversial with proponents of immediate surgery and others questioning the need for interval appendectomy. A Medline search identified 61 studies published between January 1964 and December 2005 reporting on the results of nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon. The results were pooled taking the potential clustering on the study-level into account. A meta-analysis of the morbidity after immediate surgery compared with that after nonsurgical treatment was performed. Appendiceal abscess or phlegmon is found in 3.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.6-4.9) of patients with appendicitis. Nonsurgical treatment fails in 7.2% (CI: 4.0-10.5). The need for drainage of an abscess is 19.7% (CI: 11.0-28.3). Immediate surgery is associated with a higher morbidity compared with nonsurgical treatment (odds ratio, 3.3; CI: 1.9-5.6; P < 0.001). After successful nonsurgical treatment, a malignant disease is detected in 1.2% (CI: 0.6-1.7) and an important benign disease in 0.7% (CI: 0.2-11.9) during follow-up. The risk of recurrence is 7.4% (CI: 3.7-11.1). The results of this review of mainly retrospective studies support the practice of nonsurgical treatment without interval appendectomy in patients with appendiceal abscess or phlegmon.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              THE INCISION MADE IN THE ABDOMINAL WALL IN CASES OF APPENDICITIS, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF A NEW METHOD OF OPERATING

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Surg Open Sci
                Surg Open Sci
                Surgery Open Science
                Elsevier
                2589-8450
                22 July 2024
                August 2024
                22 July 2024
                : 20
                : 242-246
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
                [b ]University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
                [c ]Department of Surgery, Division of Burns, Trauma, Acute and Critical Care Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: 600 Moye Blvd, Greenville, NC 27834, USA. Fitzgeraldca23@ 123456ecu.edu
                Article
                S2589-8450(24)00105-2
                10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.008
                11327589
                c05b9678-33c0-4f54-968a-ad9eee5bd335
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

                History
                : 21 June 2024
                : 14 July 2024
                : 19 July 2024
                Categories
                Research Paper

                perforated appendicitis,emergency general surgery,antibiotics

                Comments

                Comment on this article