3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prediction of hypotension events with physiologic vital sign signatures in the intensive care unit

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Even brief hypotension is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We developed a machine learning model to predict the initial hypotension event among intensive care unit (ICU) patients and designed an alert system for bedside implementation.

          Materials and methods

          From the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-3) dataset, minute-by-minute vital signs were extracted. A hypotension event was defined as at least five measurements within a 10-min period of systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg and mean arterial pressure ≤ 60 mmHg. Using time series data from 30-min overlapping time windows, a random forest (RF) classifier was used to predict risk of hypotension every minute. Chronologically, the first half of extracted data was used to train the model, and the second half was used to validate the trained model. The model’s performance was measured with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC). Hypotension alerts were generated using risk score time series, a stacked RF model. A lockout time were applied for real-life implementation.

          Results

          We identified 1307 subjects (1580 ICU stays) as the hypotension group and 1619 subjects (2279 ICU stays) as the non-hypotension group. The RF model showed AUROC of 0.93 and 0.88 at 15 and 60 min, respectively, before hypotension, and AUPRC of 0.77 at 60 min before. Risk score trajectories revealed 80% and > 60% of hypotension predicted at 15 and 60 min before the hypotension, respectively. The stacked model with 15-min lockout produced on average 0.79 alerts/subject/hour (sensitivity 92.4%).

          Conclusion

          Clinically significant hypotension events in the ICU can be predicted at least 1 h before the initial hypotension episode. With a highly sensitive and reliable practical alert system, a vast majority of future hypotension could be captured, suggesting potential real-life utility.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.

          To develop and validate a new Simplified Acute Physiology Score, the SAPS II, from a large sample of surgical and medical patients, and to provide a method to convert the score to a probability of hospital mortality. The SAPS II and the probability of hospital mortality were developed and validated using data from consecutive admissions to 137 adult medical and/or surgical intensive care units in 12 countries. The 13,152 patients were randomly divided into developmental (65%) and validation (35%) samples. Patients younger than 18 years, burn patients, coronary care patients, and cardiac surgery patients were excluded. Vital status at hospital discharge. The SAPS II includes only 17 variables: 12 physiology variables, age, type of admission (scheduled surgical, unscheduled surgical, or medical), and three underlying disease variables (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, metastatic cancer, and hematologic malignancy). Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that the model performed well in the developmental sample and validated well in an independent sample of patients (P = .883 and P = .104 in the developmental and validation samples, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 in the developmental sample and 0.86 in the validation sample. The SAPS II, based on a large international sample of patients, provides an estimate of the risk of death without having to specify a primary diagnosis. This is a starting point for future evaluation of the efficiency of intensive care units.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database

            MIMIC-III (‘Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care’) is a large, single-center database comprising information relating to patients admitted to critical care units at a large tertiary care hospital. Data includes vital signs, medications, laboratory measurements, observations and notes charted by care providers, fluid balance, procedure codes, diagnostic codes, imaging reports, hospital length of stay, survival data, and more. The database supports applications including academic and industrial research, quality improvement initiatives, and higher education coursework.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration

              The TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis) Statement includes a 22-item checklist, which aims to improve the reporting of studies developing, validating, or updating a prediction model, whether for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used. This explanation and elaboration document describes the rationale; clarifies the meaning of each item; and discusses why transparent reporting is important, with a view to assessing risk of bias and clinical usefulness of the prediction model. Each checklist item of the TRIPOD Statement is explained in detail and accompanied by published examples of good reporting. The document also provides a valuable reference of issues to consider when designing, conducting, and analyzing prediction model studies. To aid the editorial process and help peer reviewers and, ultimately, readers and systematic reviewers of prediction model studies, it is recommended that authors include a completed checklist in their submission. The TRIPOD checklist can also be downloaded from www.tripod-statement.org.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                yoonjh@upmc.edu
                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                25 November 2020
                25 November 2020
                2020
                : 24
                : 661
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.21925.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, , University of Pittsburgh, ; 200 Lothrop street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.21925.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, , University of Pittsburgh, ; Pittsburgh, PA USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.147455.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2097 0344, Auton Lab, School of Computer Science, , Carnegie Mellon University, ; Pittsburgh, PA USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.21925.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, School of Nursing, , University of Pittsburgh, ; Pittsburgh, PA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0127-8384
                Article
                3379
                10.1186/s13054-020-03379-3
                7687996
                33234161
                c0515f70-f0b3-4da4-846f-4bc76a76dda7
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 18 July 2020
                : 9 November 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: K23GM138984
                Award ID: T32HL007820
                Award ID: T32HL007820
                Award ID: R01HL126811
                Award ID: R01HL126811
                Award ID: R01GM117622
                Award ID: R01GM117622
                Award ID: R01GM117622
                Award ID: R01HL126811
                Award ID: R01GM117622
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000185, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency;
                Award ID: FA8750-17-2-0130
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                machine learning,artificial intelligence,hypotension,prediction
                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                machine learning, artificial intelligence, hypotension, prediction

                Comments

                Comment on this article