9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Proportion of asymptomatic infection and nonsevere disease caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron variant: A systematic review and analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron variant seemed to cause milder disease compared to previous predominated variants. We aimed to conduct a meta‐analysis to assess the pooled proportion of nonsevere disease and asymptomatic infection among COVID‐19 patients infected with Omicron and Delta. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. We included studies of SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron infection from November 1, 2021, to April 18, 2022, and studies of Delta infection from October 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022. Studies without corresponding data, with less than 50 patients, or obviously biased concerning main outcome were excluded. Meta‐analysis was performed in R 4.2.0 with the “meta” package. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study group and vaccination status. The pooled proportion of asymptomatic infection and nonsevere disease with Omicron were 25.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.0%–38.2%) and 97.9% (95% CI 97.1%–98.7%), significantly higher than those of Delta with 8.4% (95% CI 4.4%–16.2%) and 91.4% (95% CI 87.0%–96.0%). During Omicron wave, children and adolescents had higher proportion of asymptomatic infection, SOTR and the elderly had lower proportion of nonsevere disease, vaccination of a booster dose contributed to higher proportion of both asymptomatic infection and nonsevere disease. This study estimates the pooled proportion of asymptomatic infection and nonsevere disease caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron compared to other predominant variants. The result has important implications for future policy making.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC in Scotland: demographics, risk of hospital admission, and vaccine effectiveness

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Proportion of asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19): a systematic review and meta‐analysis

            Abstract Objective We aim to systematically review the characteristics of asymptomatic infection in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Methods PubMed and EMBASE were electronically searched to identify original studies containing the rate of asymptomatic infection in COVID‐19 patients before 20 May 2020. Then mate‐analysis was conducted using R version 3.6.2. Results A total of 50155 patients from 41 studies with confirmed COVID‐19 were included. The pooled percentage of asymptomatic infection is 15.6% (95% CI: 10.1%‐23.0%). Ten included studies contain the number of pre‐symptomatic patients, who were asymptomatic at screening point and developed symptoms during follow‐up. The pooled percentage of pre‐symptomatic infection among 180 initially asymptomatic patients is 48.9% (95% CI: 31.6‐66.2%). The pooled proportion of asymptomatic infection among 1152 COVID‐19 children from 11 studies is 27.7% (95% CI: 16.4–42.7%), which is much higher than patients from all aged groups. Abnormal CT features are common in asymptomatic COVID‐19 infection. For 36 patients from 4 studies that CT results were available, 15 (41.7%) patients had bilateral involvement and 14 (38.9%) had unilateral involvement in CT results. Reduced white blood cell count, increased lactate dehydrogenase, and increased C‐reactive protein were also recorded. Conclusion About 15.6% of confirmed COVID‐19 patients are asymptomatic. Nearly half of the patients with no symptoms at detection time will develop symptoms later. Children are likely to have a higher proportion of asymptomatic infection than adults. Asymptomatic COVID‐19 patients could have abnormal laboratory and radiational manifestations which can be used as screening strategies to identify asymptomatic infection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of mRNA Vaccine Boosters against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection in Qatar

              Background Waning of vaccine protection against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and the emergence of the omicron (or B.1.1.529) variant of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have led to expedited efforts to scale up booster vaccination. Protection conferred by booster doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines in Qatar, as compared with protection conferred by the two-dose primary series, is unclear. Methods We conducted two matched retrospective cohort studies to assess the effectiveness of booster vaccination, as compared with that of a two-dose primary series alone, against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and Covid-19–related hospitalization and death during a large wave of omicron infections from December 19, 2021, through January 26, 2022. The association of booster status with infection was estimated with the use of Cox proportional-hazards regression models. Results In a population of 2,239,193 persons who had received at least two doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine, those who had also received a booster were matched with persons who had not received a booster. Among the BNT162b2-vaccinated persons, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic omicron infection was 2.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 2.5) in the booster cohort and 4.5% (95% CI, 4.3 to 4.6) in the nonbooster cohort after 35 days of follow-up. Booster effectiveness against symptomatic omicron infection, as compared with that of the primary series, was 49.4% (95% CI, 47.1 to 51.6). Booster effectiveness against Covid-19–related hospitalization and death due to omicron infection, as compared with the primary series, was 76.5% (95% CI, 55.9 to 87.5). BNT162b2 booster effectiveness against symptomatic infection with the delta (or B.1.617.2) variant, as compared with the primary series, was 86.1% (95% CI, 67.3 to 94.1). Among the mRNA-1273–vaccinated persons, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic omicron infection was 1.0% (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.2) in the booster cohort and 1.9% (95% CI, 1.8 to 2.1) in the nonbooster cohort after 35 days; booster effectiveness against symptomatic omicron infection, as compared with the primary series, was 47.3% (95% CI, 40.7 to 53.3). Few severe Covid-19 cases were noted in the mRNA-1273–vaccinated cohorts. Conclusions The messenger RNA (mRNA) boosters were highly effective against symptomatic delta infection, but they were less effective against symptomatic omicron infection. However, with both variants, mRNA boosters led to strong protection against Covid-19–related hospitalization and death. (Funded by Weill Cornell Medicine–Qatar and others.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                shenzhongliangnjnu@163.com
                jmzhang@fudan.edu.cn
                Journal
                J Med Virol
                J Med Virol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9071
                JMV
                Journal of Medical Virology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0146-6615
                1096-9071
                24 August 2022
                24 August 2022
                : 10.1002/jmv.28066
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China
                [ 2 ] Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology (MOE/MOH), Shanghai Medical College Fudan University Shanghai China
                [ 3 ] Department of Infectious Diseases, Jing' An Branch of Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence Zhongliang Shen and Jiming Zhang, Department of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Room 510, Building 5, 12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, China.

                Email: shenzhongliangnjnu@ 123456163.com and jmzhang@ 123456fudan.edu.cn

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2167-9986
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2466-3736
                Article
                JMV28066
                10.1002/jmv.28066
                9538850
                35961786
                bfba7c9b-a586-4813-a20f-3d12ec1785af
                © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 21 July 2022
                : 15 May 2022
                : 09 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 0, Pages: 12, Words: 4822
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China , doi 10.13039/501100001809;
                Funded by: Shanghai Key Clinical Specialty Construction Program
                Funded by: Shanghai Shen Kang Hospital Development Center , doi 10.13039/501100010167;
                Funded by: Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.0 mode:remove_FC converted:07.10.2022

                Microbiology & Virology
                asymptomatic infection,clinical severity,covid‐19,meta‐analysis,sars‐cov‐2 variants

                Comments

                Comment on this article