61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Under Acute Stress: The Role of Trait Perceived Stress

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Delay discounting refers to the reduction of the value of a future reward as the delay to that reward increases. The rate at which individuals discount future rewards varies as a function of both individual and contextual differences, and high delay discounting rates have been linked with problematic behaviors, including drug abuse and gambling. The current study investigated the effects of acute anticipatory stress on delay discounting, while considering two important factors: individual perceptions of stress and whether the stressful situation is future-focused or present-focused. Half of the participants experienced acute stress by anticipating giving a videotaped speech. This stress was either future-oriented (speech about future job) or present-oriented (speech about physical appearance). They then performed a delay discounting task, in which they chose between smaller, immediate rewards, and larger, delayed rewards. Their scores on the Perceived Stress Scale were also collected. The way in which one appraises stressful situations interacts with acute stress to influence choices; under stressful conditions, delay discounting rate was highest in individuals with low trait perceived stress and lowest for individuals with high trait perceived stress. This result might be related to individual variation in reward responsiveness under stress. Furthermore, the time orientation of the task interacted with its stressfulness to affect the individual’s propensity to choose immediate rewards. These findings add to our understanding of the intermediary factors between stress and decision-making.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Stress and hippocampal plasticity.

          B S McEwen (1999)
          The hippocampus is a target of stress hormones, and it is an especially plastic and vulnerable region of the brain. It also responds to gonadal, thyroid, and adrenal hormones, which modulate changes in synapse formation and dendritic structure and regulate dentate gyrus volume during development and in adult life. Two forms of structural plasticity are affected by stress: Repeated stress causes atrophy of dendrites in the CA3 region, and both acute and chronic stress suppresses neurogenesis of dentate gyrus granule neurons. Besides glucocorticoids, excitatory amino acids and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are involved in these two forms of plasticity as well as in neuronal death that is caused in pyramidal neurons by seizures and by ischemia. The two forms of hippocampal structural plasticity are relevant to the human hippocampus, which undergoes a selective atrophy in a number of disorders, accompanied by deficits in declarative episodic, spatial, and contextual memory performance. It is important, from a therapeutic standpoint, to distinguish between a permanent loss of cells and a reversible atrophy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High-speed scanning in human memory.

            When subjects judge whether a test symbol is contained in a short memorized sequence of symbols, their mean reaction-time increases linearly with the length of the sequence. The linearity and slope of the function imply the existence of an internal serial-comparison process whose average rate is between 25 and 30 symbols per second.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

              When choosing between delayed or uncertain outcomes, individuals discount the value of such outcomes on the basis of the expected time to or the likelihood of their occurrence. In an integrative review of the expanding experimental literature on discounting, the authors show that although the same form of hyperbola-like function describes discounting of both delayed and probabilistic outcomes, a variety of recent findings are inconsistent with a single-process account. The authors also review studies that compare discounting in different populations and discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings. The present effort illustrates the value of studying choice involving both delayed and probabilistic outcomes within a general discounting framework that uses similar experimental procedures and a common analytical approach. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychology
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Research Foundation
                1664-1078
                19 July 2012
                2012
                : 3
                : 251
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, New York University New York, NY, USA
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, Marquette University Milwaukee, WI, USA
                [3] 3Department of Psychology, Rutgers University Newark, NJ, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mara Mather, University of Southern California, USA

                Reviewed by: John Monterosso, University of Southern California, USA; Louise Cosand, University of Southern California, USA; Taiki Takahashi, Hokkaido University, Japan

                *Correspondence: Elizabeth Tricomi, Rutgers-Newark Psychology Department, 101 Warren Street, Newark, NJ 07102, USA. e-mail: etricomi@ 123456psychology.rutgers.edu

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Emotion Science, a specialty of Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00251
                3400439
                22833731
                bfa2a77e-5f6c-4c29-bb28-4603cb0f0c3c
                Copyright © 2012 Lempert, Porcelli, Delgado and Tricomi.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 09 May 2012
                : 28 June 2012
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 1, References: 77, Pages: 10, Words: 9764
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                decision-making,stress,future orientation,delay discounting,perceived stress

                Comments

                Comment on this article