12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prevalence, causes and mental health impact of workplace bullying in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit environment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The aim of this study is to examine the prevalence, to report barriers and mental health impact of bullying behaviours and to analyse whether psychological support at work could affect victims of bullying in the healthcare workplace.

          Design

          Self-administered questionnaire survey.

          Setting

          20 in total neonatal intensive care units in 17 hospitals in Greece.

          Participants

          398 healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses).

          Main outcome measures

          The questionnaire included information on demographic data, Negative Act Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) behaviour scale, data on sources of bullying, perpetrators profile, causal factors, actions taken and reasons for not reporting bullying, psychological support and 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) scores to investigate psychological distress.

          Results

          Prevalence of bullying measured by the NAQ-R was 53.1% for doctors and 53.6% for nurses. Victims of bullying differed from non-bullied in terms of gender and job experience, among demographic data. Crude NAQ-R score was found higher for female, young and inexperienced employees. Of those respondents who experienced bullying 44.9% self-labelled themselves as victims. Witnessing bullying of others was found 83.2%. Perpetrators were mainly females 45–64 years old, most likely being a supervisor/senior colleague. Common reasons for not reporting bullying was self-dealing and fear of consequences. Bullying was attributed to personality trait and management. Those who were bullied, self-labelled as a victim and witnessed bullying of others had higher GHQ-12 score. Moreover, psychological support at work had a favour effect on victims of bullying.

          Conclusions

          Prevalence of bullying and witnessing were found extremely high, while half of victims did not consider themselves as sufferers. The mental health impact on victims and witnesses was severe and support at work was necessary to ensure good mental health status among employees.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ways of Explaining Workplace Bullying: A Review of Enabling, Motivating and Precipitating Structures and Processes in the Work Environment

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2018
                24 February 2018
                : 8
                : 2
                : e018766
                Affiliations
                [1 ] department2nd Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University , G.P.N. Papageorgiou Hospital , Thessaloniki, Greece
                [2 ] department1st Psychiatric Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University , G.P.N. Papageorgiou Hospital , Thessaloniki, Greece
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Business Administration , University of Macedonia , Thessaloniki, Greece
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Ilias Chatziioannidis; drilias@ 123456windowslive.com
                Article
                bmjopen-2017-018766
                10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018766
                5855440
                29478015
                bf92a9f9-cea5-4144-97ba-36099c0db2ba
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 21 July 2017
                : 11 November 2017
                : 04 January 2018
                Categories
                Paediatrics
                Research
                1506
                1719
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article