11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tissue classification and diagnosis of colorectal cancer histopathology images using deep learning algorithms. Is the time ripe for clinical practice implementation?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Colorectal cancer is one of the most prevalent types of cancer, with histopathologic examination of biopsied tissue samples remaining the gold standard for diagnosis. During the past years, artificial intelligence (AI) has steadily found its way into the field of medicine and pathology, especially with the introduction of whole slide imaging (WSI). The main outcome of interest was the composite balanced accuracy (ACC) as well as the F1 score. The average reported ACC from the collected studies was 95.8 ±3.8%. Reported F1 scores reached as high as 0.975, with an average of 89.7 ±9.8%, indicating that existing deep learning algorithms can achieve in silico distinction between malignant and benign. Overall, the available state-of-the-art algorithms are non-inferior to pathologists for image analysis and classification tasks. However, due to their inherent uniqueness in their training and lack of widely accepted external validation datasets, their generalization potential is still limited.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

          The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System is both a conceptual and practical advance over its 2007 predecessor. For the first time, the WHO classification of CNS tumors uses molecular parameters in addition to histology to define many tumor entities, thus formulating a concept for how CNS tumor diagnoses should be structured in the molecular era. As such, the 2016 CNS WHO presents major restructuring of the diffuse gliomas, medulloblastomas and other embryonal tumors, and incorporates new entities that are defined by both histology and molecular features, including glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype and glioblastoma, IDH-mutant; diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant; RELA fusion-positive ependymoma; medulloblastoma, WNT-activated and medulloblastoma, SHH-activated; and embryonal tumour with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered. The 2016 edition has added newly recognized neoplasms, and has deleted some entities, variants and patterns that no longer have diagnostic and/or biological relevance. Other notable changes include the addition of brain invasion as a criterion for atypical meningioma and the introduction of a soft tissue-type grading system for the now combined entity of solitary fibrous tumor / hemangiopericytoma-a departure from the manner by which other CNS tumors are graded. Overall, it is hoped that the 2016 CNS WHO will facilitate clinical, experimental and epidemiological studies that will lead to improvements in the lives of patients with brain tumors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

              In 2003, the QUADAS tool for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies was developed. Experience, anecdotal reports, and feedback suggested areas for improvement; therefore, QUADAS-2 was developed. This tool comprises 4 domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Each domain is assessed in terms of risk of bias, and the first 3 domains are also assessed in terms of concerns regarding applicability. Signalling questions are included to help judge risk of bias. The QUADAS-2 tool is applied in 4 phases: summarize the review question, tailor the tool and produce review-specific guidance, construct a flow diagram for the primary study, and judge bias and applicability. This tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Prz Gastroenterol
                Prz Gastroenterol
                PG
                Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny
                Termedia Publishing House
                1895-5770
                1897-4317
                07 August 2023
                2023
                : 18
                : 4
                : 353-367
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of D/I Radiology, Patras General Hospital, Patras, Greece
                [2 ]Department of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
                [3 ]Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
                [4 ]Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [5 ]First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
                [6 ]Intelligent Systems Lab, Department of Cultural Technology and Communication, University of the Aegean, Mytilene, Greece
                [7 ]Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery Unit, First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Francesk Mulita, Department of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece, e-mail: oknarfmulita@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                51207
                10.5114/pg.2023.130337
                10985751
                38572457
                bf6fcb87-065a-4e30-a331-33f9df9d031e
                Copyright © 2023 Termedia

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

                History
                : 13 April 2023
                : 20 May 2023
                Categories
                Review Paper

                colorectal cancer,artificial intelligence,deep learning algorithms,surgical practice

                Comments

                Comment on this article