1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Is Healthy Neuroticism Associated with Health Behaviors? A Coordinated Integrative Data Analysis

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 12 , 17 , 17 , 5 , 11 , 7 , 6 , 6 , 6 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 10 , 21 , 10 , 22 , 23 , 8 , 8 , 1 , 24
      ,
      Collabra: Psychology
      University of California Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Current literature suggests that neuroticism is positively associated with maladaptive life choices, likelihood of disease, and mortality. However, recent research has identified circumstances under which neuroticism is associated with positive outcomes. The current project examined whether “healthy neuroticism”, defined as the interaction of neuroticism and conscientiousness, was associated with the following health behaviors: smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity. Using a pre-registered multi-study coordinated integrative data analysis (IDA) approach, we investigated whether “healthy neuroticism” predicted the odds of engaging in each of the aforementioned activities. Each study estimated identical models, using the same covariates and data transformations, enabling optimal comparability of results. These results were then meta-analyzed in order to estimate an average (N-weighted) effect and to ascertain the extent of heterogeneity in the effects. Overall, these results suggest that neuroticism alone was not related to health behaviors, while individuals higher in conscientiousness were less likely to be smokers or drinkers, and more likely to engage in physical activity. In terms of the healthy neuroticism interaction of neuroticism and conscientiousness, significant interactions for smoking and physical activity suggest that the association between neuroticism and health behaviors was smaller among those high in conscientiousness. These findings lend credence to the idea that healthy neuroticism may be linked to certain health behaviors and that these effects are generalizable across several heterogeneous samples.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The weirdest people in the world?

          Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Researchers - often implicitly - assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these "standard subjects" are as representative of the species as any other population. Are these assumptions justified? Here, our review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species - frequent outliers. The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning, categorization and inferential induction, moral reasoning, reasoning styles, self-concepts and related motivations, and the heritability of IQ. The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans. Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior - hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation. Overall, these empirical patterns suggests that we need to be less cavalier in addressing questions of human nature on the basis of data drawn from this particularly thin, and rather unusual, slice of humanity. We close by proposing ways to structurally re-organize the behavioral sciences to best tackle these challenges.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project.

            The Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project are both ongoing longitudinal clinical-pathologic cohort studies of aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cohort Profile: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).

              The Health and Retirement Study (HRS) is a nationally representative longitudinal survey of more than 37 000 individuals over age 50 in 23 000 households in the USA. The survey, which has been fielded every 2 years since 1992, was established to provide a national resource for data on the changing health and economic circumstances associated with ageing at both individual and population levels. Its multidisciplinary approach is focused on four broad topics-income and wealth; health, cognition and use of healthcare services; work and retirement; and family connections. HRS data are also linked at the individual level to administrative records from Social Security and Medicare, Veteran's Administration, the National Death Index and employer-provided pension plan information. Since 2006, data collection has expanded to include biomarkers and genetics as well as much greater depth in psychology and social context. This blend of economic, health and psychosocial information provides unprecedented potential to study increasingly complex questions about ageing and retirement. The HRS has been a leading force for rapid release of data while simultaneously protecting the confidentiality of respondents. Three categories of data-public, sensitive and restricted-can be accessed through procedures described on the HRS website (hrsonline.isr.umich.edu).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Collabra: Psychology
                University of California Press
                2474-7394
                January 01 2020
                2020
                July 21 2020
                January 01 2020
                2020
                : 6
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Northwestern University, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Chicago, IL, US
                [2 ]University of Oregon, Department of Psychology, Eugene, OR, US
                [3 ]West Virginia University, Department of Psychology and the West Virginia Prevention Research Center, Morgantown, WV, US
                [4 ]Florida State University, Department of Geriatrics, Tallahassee, FL, US
                [5 ]University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
                [6 ]University of New South Wales, Centre for Healthy Brain Aging, Sydney NSW, AU
                [7 ]Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, US
                [8 ]University of Victoria, Department of Psychology, Victoria, BC, CA
                [9 ]University of Hamburg, Department of Psychology, Berlin, DE
                [10 ]Humboldt University, Department of Psychology, Berlin, DE
                [11 ]University of Southern California, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, Los Angeles, CA
                [12 ]Pennsylvania State University, Center for Healthy Aging, State College, PA, US
                [13 ]VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, US
                [14 ]Boston University, Boston, MA, US
                [15 ]University of Washington, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, WA, US
                [16 ]Pennsylvania State University, Department of Human Development and Psychology, State College, PA, US
                [17 ]Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, US
                [18 ]University of New South Wales, Department of Developmental Disability Neuropsychiatry, Sydney, NSW, AU
                [19 ]University of Melbourne Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age and National Ageing Research Institute, Kew and Parkville, AU
                [20 ]University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, AU
                [21 ]University of Zurich, Department of Psychology, Zurich, CH
                [22 ]Germany Institue for Economic Research, Berlin, DE
                [23 ]Univeristy of Edinburgh, Centre for Dementia Prevention, Edinburgh, UK
                [24 ]Northwestern University, Department of Psychology, Evanston, IL, US
                Article
                10.1525/collabra.266
                7751766
                33354649
                bf661d58-a1a0-4631-b3cb-6e395c3e3019
                © 2020

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article