9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Risks related with withholding and resuming anticoagulation in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding while on warfarin therapy.

      International Journal of Clinical Practice
      Anticoagulants, adverse effects, Case-Control Studies, Drug Substitution, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Female, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, chemically induced, Heart Valve Diseases, drug therapy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Refusal to Treat, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Warfarin

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use of warfarin is growing for the prevention or treatment of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases. The risk of haemorrhagic side effects is increased in patients taking warfarin. To evaluate risks related with withholding and resuming anticoagulation in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) while on warfarin therapy and the role of the second-look endoscopic examination (SEE). Records of 58 patients with native valvular heart diseases who presented with non-variceal UGIB during chronic anticoagulation with warfarin were retrospectively reviewed. Age- and gender-matched patients with non-variceal UGIB during aspirin therapy because of ischaemic heart disease were recruited as the control group. Development of both recurrent bleeding and thromboembolic events were more frequent in warfarin group than in control group (7.0% vs. 0% with p = 0.03 and 16.7% vs. 2.4% with p < 0.01, respectively). One of four cases of recurrent bleeding in warfarin group was found by SEE performed in an asymptomatic patient. There were six thromboembolic events which occurred on the 21st, 27th, 28th, 31st, 58th and 75th day from the presentation out of 36 patients who ceased anticoagulation. In contrast, only one from 41 in whom aspirin was discontinued experienced myocardial infarction. There was no difference in the failure of endoscopic haemostasis necessitating angiographic embolisation or surgery, hospital stay, the need of transfusion and overall mortality. Anticoagulation is recommended to be resumed before the 20th day from the cessation to prevent thromboembolic events. A routine SEE before resuming anticoagulation might be helpful to detect asymptomatic recurrent bleeding. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article