9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and evaluation of deep learning–based segmentation of histologic structures in the kidney cortex with multiple histologic stains

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The application of deep learning for automated segmentation (delineation of boundaries) of histologic primitives (structures) from whole slide images can facilitate the establishment of novel protocols for kidney biopsy assessment. Here, we developed and validated deep learning networks for the segmentation of histologic structures on kidney biopsies and nephrectomies. For development, we examined 125 biopsies for Minimal Change Disease collected across 29 NEPTUNE enrolling centers along with 459 whole slide images stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin (125), Periodic Acid Schiff (125), Silver (102), and Trichrome (107) divided into training, validation and testing sets (ratio 6:1:3). Histologic structures were manually segmented (30048 total annotations) by five nephropathologists. Twenty deep learning models were trained with optimal digital magnification across the structures and stains. Periodic Acid Schiff-stained whole slide images yielded the best concordance between pathologists and deep learning segmentation across all structures ( F-scores: 0.93 for glomerular tufts, 0.94 for glomerular tuft plus Bowman’s capsule, 0.91 for proximal tubules, 0.93 for distal tubular segments, 0.81 for peritubular capillaries, and 0.85 for arteries and afferent arterioles). Optimal digital magnifications were 5X for glomerular tuft/tuft plus Bowman’s capsule, 10X for proximal/distal tubule, arteries and afferent arterioles, and 40X for peritubular capillaries. Silver stained whole slide images yielded the worst deep learning performance. Thus, this largest study to date adapted deep learning for the segmentation of kidney histologic structures across multiple stains and pathology laboratories. All data used for training and testing and a detailed online tutorial will be publicly available.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis

          Deep learning algorithms, in particular convolutional networks, have rapidly become a methodology of choice for analyzing medical images. This paper reviews the major deep learning concepts pertinent to medical image analysis and summarizes over 300 contributions to the field, most of which appeared in the last year. We survey the use of deep learning for image classification, object detection, segmentation, registration, and other tasks. Concise overviews are provided of studies per application area: neuro, retinal, pulmonary, digital pathology, breast, cardiac, abdominal, musculoskeletal. We end with a summary of the current state-of-the-art, a critical discussion of open challenges and directions for future research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning

            Remarkable progress has been made in image recognition, primarily due to the availability of large-scale annotated datasets and deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNNs enable learning data-driven, highly representative, hierarchical image features from sufficient training data. However, obtaining datasets as comprehensively annotated as ImageNet in the medical imaging domain remains a challenge. There are currently three major techniques that successfully employ CNNs to medical image classification: training the CNN from scratch, using off-the-shelf pre-trained CNN features, and conducting unsupervised CNN pre-training with supervised fine-tuning. Another effective method is transfer learning, i.e., fine-tuning CNN models pre-trained from natural image dataset to medical image tasks. In this paper, we exploit three important, but previously understudied factors of employing deep convolutional neural networks to computer-aided detection problems. We first explore and evaluate different CNN architectures. The studied models contain 5 thousand to 160 million parameters, and vary in numbers of layers. We then evaluate the influence of dataset scale and spatial image context on performance. Finally, we examine when and why transfer learning from pre-trained ImageNet (via fine-tuning) can be useful. We study two specific computer-aided detection (CADe) problems, namely thoraco-abdominal lymph node (LN) detection and interstitial lung disease (ILD) classification. We achieve the state-of-the-art performance on the mediastinal LN detection, and report the first five-fold cross-validation classification results on predicting axial CT slices with ILD categories. Our extensive empirical evaluation, CNN model analysis and valuable insights can be extended to the design of high performance CAD systems for other medical imaging tasks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

              Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health burden with a high economic cost to health systems and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). All stages of CKD are associated with increased risks of cardiovascular morbidity, premature mortality, and/or decreased quality of life. CKD is usually asymptomatic until later stages and accurate prevalence data are lacking. Thus we sought to determine the prevalence of CKD globally, by stage, geographical location, gender and age. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies estimating CKD prevalence in general populations was conducted through literature searches in 8 databases. We assessed pooled data using a random effects model. Of 5,842 potential articles, 100 studies of diverse quality were included, comprising 6,908,440 patients. Global mean(95%CI) CKD prevalence of 5 stages 13·4%(11·7–15·1%), and stages 3–5 was 10·6%(9·2–12·2%). Weighting by study quality did not affect prevalence estimates. CKD prevalence by stage was Stage-1 (eGFR>90+ACR>30): 3·5% (2·8–4·2%); Stage-2 (eGFR 60–89+ACR>30): 3·9% (2·7–5·3%); Stage-3 (eGFR 30–59): 7·6% (6·4–8·9%); Stage-4 = (eGFR 29–15): 0·4% (0·3–0·5%); and Stage-5 (eGFR<15): 0·1% (0·1–0·1%). CKD has a high global prevalence with a consistent estimated global CKD prevalence of between 11 to 13% with the majority stage 3. Future research should evaluate intervention strategies deliverable at scale to delay the progression of CKD and improve CVD outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0323470
                5428
                Kidney Int
                Kidney Int
                Kidney international
                0085-2538
                1523-1755
                25 August 2021
                22 August 2020
                January 2021
                01 January 2022
                : 99
                : 1
                : 86-101
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [2 ]Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Vaud, Switzerland
                [3 ]Department of Pathology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
                [4 ]Department of Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
                [5 ]Department of Pathology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [6 ]Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                [7 ]Department of Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
                [8 ]Laboratory of Pathology, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
                [9 ]Lerner Research and Glickman Urology and Kidney Institutes, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [10 ]Department of Pathology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
                [11 ]Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [12 ]Department of Pathology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
                [13 ]Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [14 ]Members of The Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) are listed in the Appendix
                [15 ]CPJ and YC have contributed equally to the study.
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Catherine P. Jayapandian, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 2071 Martin Luther King Drive, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7207, USA. cpj3@ 123456case.edu
                Article
                NIHMS1715905
                10.1016/j.kint.2020.07.044
                8414393
                32835732
                beab9a78-33f7-488e-bccb-ea637342bad8

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Nephrology
                computerized morphologic assessment,deep learning,digital pathology,kidney histologic primitives,large-scale tissue interrogation,renal biopsy interpretation

                Comments

                Comment on this article