0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          To compare the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) alone versus DVI with adjunctive sweeping of membranes (ASM) for induction of labor (IOL).

          Methods

          Single‐center, prospective, randomized controlled trial; women with singleton term pregnancies, cervical dilation ≥1 and <3 cm, intact membranes allocated to either DVI or DVI with ASM. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 h of insertion. Secondary outcomes included mean time from insertion to delivery, tachysystole, operative delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status (NRFS), tocolytics, fetal outcomes, pain information, and subject satisfaction.

          Results

          One hundred and four received DVI (Group 1) alone and 104 DVI with ASM (Group 2). The rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h was 53% versus 56%, cesarean rate 8.7% versus 10.6% in Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Although the duration of labor was similar in both groups, about 6% of women required additional ripening with dinoprostone vaginal tablets in Group 2 compared to 11.5% in Group 1 ( p‐value = 0.2). The frequency of hyperstimulation syndrome, failed induction, analgesic requirements, and fetal outcomes were comparable. The majority (83%–86%) in either cohort were satisfied with their labor experience. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated a slightly better chance for vaginal delivery within 24 h (odds ratio [OR] 1.22 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.65–2.29]; p‐value 0.53] for DVI with ASM, although statistically insignificant. Younger maternal age and multiparity (OR 10.36 [95% CI 4.88–23.67]; p‐value <0.0001) contributed to successful IOL.

          Conclusion

          DVI with ASM is at least as efficacious as DVI for cervical ripening with no increase in morbidity. Although DVI with ASM group less often needed additional dinoprostone tablets to complete the process of IOL ( p‐value = 0.2), adjunctive sweeping has not been shown to have a significant impact on the duration of labor or mode of delivery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

          The perinatal and maternal consequences of induction of labor at 39 weeks among low-risk nulliparous women are uncertain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor.

            (2009)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Births: final data for 2009.

              This report presents 2009 data on U.S. births according to a wide variety of characteristics. Data are presented for maternal characteristics including age, live-birth order, race and Hispanic origin, marital status, hypertension during pregnancy, attendant at birth, method of delivery, and infant characteristics (period of gestation, birthweight, and plurality). Birth and fertility rates by age, live-birth order, race and Hispanic origin, and marital status also are presented. Selected data by mother's state of residence are shown, as well as birth rates by age and race of father. Trends in fertility patterns and maternal and infant characteristics are described and interpreted. Descriptive tabulations of data reported on the birth certificates of the 4.13 million births that occurred in 2009 are presented. Denominators for population-based rates are postcensal estimates derived from the U.S. 2000 census. The number of births declined to 4,130,665 in 2009, 3 percent less than in 2008. The general fertility rate declined 3 percent to 66.7 per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years. The teenage birth rate fell 6 percent to 39.1 per 1,000. Birth rates for women in each 5-year age group from 20 through 39 years declined, but the rate for women 40-44 years continued to rise. The total fertility rate (estimated number of births over a woman's lifetime) was down 4 percent to 2,007.0 per 1,000 women. The number and rate of births to unmarried women declined, whereas the percentage of nonmarital births increased slightly to 41.0. The cesarean delivery rate rose again, to 32.9 percent. The preterm birth rate declined to 12.18 percent; the low birthweight rate was stable at 8.16 percent. The twin birth rate increased to 33.2 per 1,000; the triplet and higher-order multiple birth rate rose 4 percent to 153.5 per 100,000.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                anju.bhatia@kkh.com.sg
                Journal
                J Obstet Gynaecol Res
                J Obstet Gynaecol Res
                10.1111/(ISSN)1447-0756
                JOG
                The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
                John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd (Kyoto, Japan )
                1341-8076
                1447-0756
                23 June 2021
                September 2021
                : 47
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1111/jog.v47.9 )
                : 3171-3178
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine KK Women's and Children's Hospital Singapore Singapore
                [ 2 ] Division of Nursing KK Women's and Children's Hospital Singapore Singapore
                [ 3 ] Division of Obstetrics & Gynaecology KK Women's and Children's Hospital Singapore Singapore
                [ 4 ] Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology St George's University of London London UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence Anju Bhatia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore. Email: anju.bhatia@ 123456kkh.com.sg

                Article
                JOG14907
                10.1111/jog.14907
                8453915
                34162016
                be92308f-e108-4fb0-a06f-ae2fe845a491
                © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 13 April 2021
                : 07 January 2021
                : 08 June 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 8, Words: 4816
                Funding
                Funded by: Ferring , doi 10.13039/501100003122;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.7 mode:remove_FC converted:21.09.2021

                cervical ripening,dinoprostone vaginal insert,hyperstimulation,labor induction,patient comfort,vaginal delivery

                Comments

                Comment on this article