2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of maternal body mass index on human milk composition and associations to infant metabolism and gut colonisation: MAINHEALTH – a study protocol for an observational birth cohort

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Human milk provides all macronutrients for growth, bioactive compounds, micro-organisms and immunological components, which potentially interacts with and primes infant growth and, development, immune responses and the gut microbiota of the new-born. Infants with an overweight mother are more likely to become overweight later in life and overweight has been related to the gut microbiome. Therefore, it is important to investigate the mother-milk-infant triad as a biological system and if the maternal weight status influences the human milk composition, infant metabolism and gut microbiome.

          Methods and analysis

          This study aims to include 200 mother–infant dyads stratified into one of three body mass index (BMI) categories based on mother’s prepregnancy BMI. Multiomics analyses include metabolomics, proteomics, glycomics and microbiomics methods, aiming to characterise human milk from the mothers and further relate the composition to infant gut microbiota and its metabolic impact in the infant. Infant gut microbiota is analysed using 16S sequencing of faeces samples. Nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry are used for the remaining omics analysis. We investigate whether maternal pre-pregnancy BMI results in a distinct human milk composition that potentially affects the initial priming of the infant’s gut environment and metabolism early in life.

          Ethics and dissemination

          The Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics has approved the protocol (J-nr. 1-10-72-296-18). All participants have before inclusion signed informed consent and deputy informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki II. Results will be disseminated to health professionals including paediatricians, research community, nutritional policymakers, industry and finally the public. The scientific community will be informed via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences, the industry will be invited for meetings, and the public will be informed via reports in science magazines and the general press. Data cleared for personal data, will be deposited at public data repositories.

          Trial registration number

          Danish regional committee of the Central Jutland Region, journal number: 1-10-72-296-18, version 6.

          Danish Data Protection Agency, journal number: 2016-051-000001, 1304.

          ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05111990.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners

            The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data management platform was developed in 2004 to address an institutional need at Vanderbilt University, then shared with a limited number of adopting sites beginning in 2006. Given bi-directional benefit in early sharing experiments, we created a broader consortium sharing and support model for any academic, non-profit, or government partner wishing to adopt the software. Our sharing framework and consortium-based support model have evolved over time along with the size of the consortium (currently more than 3200 REDCap partners across 128 countries). While the "REDCap Consortium" model represents only one example of how to build and disseminate a software platform, lessons learned from our approach may assist other research institutions seeking to build and disseminate innovative technologies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

              High quality protocols facilitate proper conduct, reporting, and external review of clinical trials. However, the completeness of trial protocols is often inadequate. To help improve the content and quality of protocols, an international group of stakeholders developed the SPIRIT 2013 Statement (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials). The SPIRIT Statement provides guidance in the form of a checklist of recommended items to include in a clinical trial protocol. This SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper provides important information to promote full understanding of the checklist recommendations. For each checklist item, we provide a rationale and detailed description; a model example from an actual protocol; and relevant references supporting its importance. We strongly recommend that this explanatory paper be used in conjunction with the SPIRIT Statement. A website of resources is also available (www.spirit-statement.org). The SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper, together with the Statement, should help with the drafting of trial protocols. Complete documentation of key trial elements can facilitate transparency and protocol review for the benefit of all stakeholders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2022
                2 November 2022
                : 12
                : 11
                : e059552
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Food Science , Aarhus University , Aarhus N, Denmark
                [2 ]departmentSino-Danish Centre for Education and Research (SDC) , University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing, People's Republic of China
                [3 ]departmentDepartment of Food Science , University of Copenhagen , København, Denmark
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Clinical Medicine , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus N, Denmark
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Ulrik Kræmer Sundekilde; uksundekilde@ 123456food.au.dk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7478-3779
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-1358
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4849-0996
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-059552
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059552
                9639067
                36323479
                be7a0718-3401-436a-944e-27b847a8cc2d
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 24 November 2021
                : 09 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007605, Aarhus Universitet;
                Award ID: N/A
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100020733, Sino-Danish Center;
                Award ID: N/A
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100017966, Arla Food for Health;
                Award ID: N/A
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001734, Københavns Universitet;
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Paediatrics
                1506
                1719
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                microbiology,nutrition & dietetics,paediatrics
                Medicine
                microbiology, nutrition & dietetics, paediatrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article