0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The clinical outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Stage III and IVA–B hypopharyngeal carcinoma presents a substantial risk of recurrence and metastasis. The treatment strategy remains uncertain. The objective of this observational study was to compare the outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (ICRT) and induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (ICCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

          Methods

          58 patients with stage III and IVA–B hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with ICRT (n = 26) or ICCRT (n = 32) were enrolled in the study. Baseline variables and toxicity rates were compared by Chi-squared test. Survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to evaluate the potential survival effects.

          Results

          There were no significant differences in gender, age, smoking, drinking, T category, N category, overall stage, induction chemotherapy schemes and cycles between the two groups. The median follow-up time was 36.3 months (range, 2.3–97.5 months). The 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and the 1-year, 2-year overall survival (OS) expressed no significant differences between the two groups. Furthermore, induction chemotherapy regimen of TPF achieved better OS than TP or PF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.395, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.178–0.879; P = 0.023), OS of patients in N2-3 category was worse than N0-1 (HR 2.594, 95 % CI 1.230–5.471; P = 0.012). In addition, the grade 3–4 therapy-associated toxicities during radiotherapy were higher in the chemoradiotherapy group than in radiotherapy alone group ( P = 0.020).

          Conclusion

          Following induction chemotherapy in patients with stage III/IVA-B hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, the concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen provided similar survival rates with radiotherapy alone. Meanwhile, the incidence of treatment-related side effects during radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy were lower than that during chemoradiotherapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

          This article provides an update on the global cancer burden using the GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Worldwide, an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases (18.1 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and almost 10.0 million cancer deaths (9.9 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) occurred in 2020. Female breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%), followed by lung (11.4%), colorectal (10.0 %), prostate (7.3%), and stomach (5.6%) cancers. Lung cancer remained the leading cause of cancer death, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths (18%), followed by colorectal (9.4%), liver (8.3%), stomach (7.7%), and female breast (6.9%) cancers. Overall incidence was from 2-fold to 3-fold higher in transitioned versus transitioning countries for both sexes, whereas mortality varied <2-fold for men and little for women. Death rates for female breast and cervical cancers, however, were considerably higher in transitioning versus transitioned countries (15.0 vs 12.8 per 100,000 and 12.4 vs 5.2 per 100,000, respectively). The global cancer burden is expected to be 28.4 million cases in 2040, a 47% rise from 2020, with a larger increase in transitioning (64% to 95%) versus transitioned (32% to 56%) countries due to demographic changes, although this may be further exacerbated by increasing risk factors associated with globalization and a growing economy. Efforts to build a sustainable infrastructure for the dissemination of cancer prevention measures and provision of cancer care in transitioning countries is critical for global cancer control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

            Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                01 October 2024
                30 October 2024
                01 October 2024
                : 10
                : 20
                : e38811
                Affiliations
                [a ]Country Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
                [b ]Country Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. chenyong@ 123456mail.sysu.edu.cn
                [1]

                Co-first author: Ke Jiang, Meiyan Zhu.

                Article
                S2405-8440(24)14842-6 e38811
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38811
                11533557
                39498037
                be5bd0b1-1722-497d-8efd-d553367fcbf8
                © 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 July 2024
                : 30 September 2024
                : 30 September 2024
                Categories
                Research Article

                hypopharyngeal carcinoma,concurrent chemoradiotherapy,radiotherapy,prognosis,toxicity

                Comments

                Comment on this article