11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dual inhibition of TGF‐β and PD‐L1: a novel approach to cancer treatment

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) initiate signaling pathways with complementary, nonredundant immunosuppressive functions in the tumor microenvironment (TME). In the TME, dysregulated TGF‐β signaling suppresses antitumor immunity and promotes cancer fibrosis, epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition, and angiogenesis. Meanwhile, PD‐L1 expression inactivates cytotoxic T cells and restricts immunosurveillance in the TME. Anti‐PD‐L1 therapies have been approved for the treatment of various cancers, but TGF‐β signaling in the TME is associated with resistance to these therapies. In this review, we discuss the importance of the TGF‐β and PD‐L1 pathways in cancer, as well as clinical strategies using combination therapies that block these pathways separately or approaches with dual‐targeting agents (bispecific and bifunctional immunotherapies) that may block them simultaneously. Currently, the furthest developed dual‐targeting agent is bintrafusp alfa. This drug is a first‐in‐class bifunctional fusion protein that consists of the extracellular domain of the TGF‐βRII receptor (a TGF‐β ‘trap’) fused to a human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody blocking PD‐L1. Given the immunosuppressive effects of the TGF‐β and PD‐L1 pathways within the TME, colocalized and simultaneous inhibition of these pathways may potentially improve clinical activity and reduce toxicity.

          Abstract

          The TGF‐β and PD‐L1 signaling pathways have complementary, nonredundant functions in the tumor microenvironment. Dysregulated TGF‐β signaling suppresses antitumor immunity and promotes cancer fibrosis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and angiogenesis, while PD‐L1 restricts immunosurveillance. We review existing strategies for simultaneous inhibition of these pathways, highlighting dual‐targeting agents that may provide colocalized, simultaneous inhibition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references104

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          TGF-β attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells

          Therapeutic antibodies that block the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway can induce robust and durable responses in patients with various cancers, including metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) 1–5 . However, these responses only occur in a subset of patients. Elucidating the determinants of response and resistance is key to improving outcomes and developing new treatment strategies. Here, we examined tumours from a large cohort of mUC patients treated with an anti–PD-L1 agent (atezolizumab) and identified major determinants of clinical outcome. Response was associated with CD8+ T-effector cell phenotype and, to an even greater extent, high neoantigen or tumour mutation burden (TMB). Lack of response was associated with a signature of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signalling in fibroblasts, particularly in patients with CD8+ T cells that were excluded from the tumour parenchyma and instead found in the fibroblast- and collagen-rich peritumoural stroma—a common phenotype among patients with mUC. Using a mouse model that recapitulates this immune excluded phenotype, we found that therapeutic administration of a TGF-β blocking antibody together with anti–PD-L1 reduced TGF-β signalling in stromal cells, facilitated T cell penetration into the centre of the tumour, and provoked vigorous anti-tumour immunity and tumour regression. Integration of these three independent biological features provides the best basis for understanding outcome in this setting and suggests that TGF-β shapes the tumour microenvironment to restrain anti-tumour immunity by restricting T cell infiltration.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer–immune set point

            Immunotherapy is proving to be an effective therapeutic approach in a variety of cancers. But despite the clinical success of antibodies against the immune regulators CTLA4 and PD-L1/PD-1, only a subset of people exhibit durable responses, suggesting that a broader view of cancer immunity is
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Primary, Adaptive, and Acquired Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy.

              Cancer immunotherapy can induce long lasting responses in patients with metastatic cancers of a wide range of histologies. Broadening the clinical applicability of these treatments requires an improved understanding of the mechanisms limiting cancer immunotherapy. The interactions between the immune system and cancer cells are continuous, dynamic, and evolving from the initial establishment of a cancer cell to the development of metastatic disease, which is dependent on immune evasion. As the molecular mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy are elucidated, actionable strategies to prevent or treat them may be derived to improve clinical outcomes for patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                gulleyj@mail.nih.gov
                Journal
                Mol Oncol
                Mol Oncol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1878-0261
                MOL2
                Molecular Oncology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1574-7891
                1878-0261
                04 January 2022
                June 2022
                : 16
                : 11 ( doiID: 10.1002/mol2.v16.11 )
                : 2117-2134
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Genitourinary Malignancies Branch Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Bethesda MD USA
                [ 2 ] Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Bethesda MD USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Radiation Oncology University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Pathology University of Colorado Aurora CO USA
                [ 5 ] ICREA Vall D’Hebron Institute of Oncology CIBERONC Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
                [ 6 ] EMD Serono Billerica MA USA
                [ 7 ] Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology Science for Life Laboratory Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
                [ 8 ]Present address: Fusion Pharmaceuticals Boston MA USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                J. L. Gulley, Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Building 10, Room 13N240, Bethesda, MD 20892‐1750, USA

                Tel: +1 301 480 7164

                E‐mail: gulleyj@ 123456mail.nih.gov

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-2912
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9131-3827
                Article
                MOL213146
                10.1002/1878-0261.13146
                9168966
                34854206
                be512cff-0345-4c24-b37c-0ca4be9701c7
                © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 03 November 2021
                : 12 July 2021
                : 30 November 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 2134, Words: 11561
                Funding
                Funded by: Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany , doi 10.13039/100009945;
                Funded by: GlaxoSmithKline , doi 10.13039/100004330;
                Funded by: Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute , doi 10.13039/100000054;
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA , doi 10.13039/100000002;
                Funded by: EMD Serono, Billerica, MA, USA , doi 10.13039/100004755;
                Categories
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.6 mode:remove_FC converted:06.06.2022

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                immune checkpoint inhibitor,pd‐l1,tgf‐β,tumor microenvironment
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                immune checkpoint inhibitor, pd‐l1, tgf‐β, tumor microenvironment

                Comments

                Comment on this article