8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you are working on an article, have an idea for a book or would like to contribute a blog or commentary on circular construction, then we’d love to hear from you https://bit.ly/4bcmCpg

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Crisis management in public–private partnerships: lessons from the global crises in the XXI century

      , ,
      Built Environment Project and Asset Management
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Global crises have become increasingly recurrent events that jeopardize public-private partnerships (PPPs). In this context, the purpose of this paper is to expose the PPP-crisis research agenda by combining bibliometric and network analyses.

          Design/methodology/approach

          The PPP literature associated with global crises between the 2008 global financial crisis and 2022 was analyzed in three stages: (1) paper selection and screening for the inclusion/exclusion of articles relevant to this research, (2) semantic network development for examining thematic relationships among selected papers by considering the co-occurrence of keywords within the chosen studies and (3) calculation of network metrics for analysis.

          Findings

          The paper identified six research avenues for the PPP-crisis agenda: public interest, relational governance, risk management, user-pay PPPs, crisis management and financial performance. The PPP-crisis literature has spread significantly in the last five years driven by the case study approaches on a national or regional basis. Conversely, non-crisis periods generate room to strengthen user-pay PPPs and relational governance. The pandemic and post-pandemic times shared the priorities of the 2008 financial crisis but also strengthened the management of the risks and the structural drivers of the global crisis.

          Originality/value

          This study demonstrates that during global crisis periods, the public interest and financial performance gain relevance in a detriment of structural solutions to social legitimacy erosion of PPPs because of the urgency of giving tools to the public and private sectors to tackle the financial issues, which steer future issues for PPPs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Financial markets under the global pandemic of COVID-19

          Highlights • The COVID-19 pandemic has significant impacts on global financial markets. • Substantial increases of volatility are found in global markets due to the outbreak. • Global stock markets linkages display clear different patterns before and after the pandemic announcement. • Policy responses may create further uncertainties in the global financial markets.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Creating and Capturing Value in Public-Private Ties: A Private Actor's Perspective

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Financing firms in hibernation during the COVID-19 pandemic

              The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic halted economic activity worldwide, hurting firms and pushing many of them toward bankruptcy. This paper discusses four central issues that have emerged in the academic and policy debates related to firm financing during the downturn. First, the economic crisis triggered by the pandemic is radically different from past crises, with important consequences for optimal policy responses. Second, it is important to preserve firms’ relationships with key stakeholders (e.g., workers, suppliers, customers, and creditors) to avoid inefficient bankruptcies and long-term detrimental economic effects. Third, firms can benefit from “hibernation,” incurring the minimum bare expenses necessary to withstand the pandemic while using credit to remain alive until the crisis subdues. Fourth, the existing legal and regulatory infrastructure is ill-equipped to deal with an exogenous systemic shock like a pandemic. Financial sector policies can help channel credit to firms, but they are hard to implement and entail different trade-offs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Built Environment Project and Asset Management
                BEPAM
                Emerald
                2044-124X
                June 13 2023
                January 11 2024
                June 13 2023
                January 11 2024
                : 14
                : 1
                : 56-73
                Article
                10.1108/BEPAM-11-2022-0174
                be41fb74-2c03-4fb9-939f-2962bcaa9f53
                © 2024

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article