0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Psychosocial impacts of Baby Friendly Spaces for Rohingya refugee mothers in Bangladesh: A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study evaluated the effectiveness of Baby Friendly Spaces (BFS), a psychosocial support program for Rohingya refugee mothers of malnourished young children in Bangladesh. Because BFS was already being implemented, we examined the benefit of enhancing implementation supports.

          Methods

          In matched pairs, 10 sites were randomized to provide BFS treatment as usual (BFS-TAU) or to receive enhanced implementation support (BFS-IE). 600 mothers were enrolled and reported on maternal distress, functional impairment, subjective well-being and coping at baseline and 8-week follow-up. Data were analyzed using multilevel linear regression models to account for clustering; sensitivity analyses adjusted for the small number of clusters.

          Results

          Significant within-group improvements in BFSIE were observed for distres (−.48, p = .014), functional impairment (−.30, p = .002) and subjective well-being (.92, p = .011); improvements in BFS-TAU were smaller and not statistically significant. Between-group comparisons favored BFS-IE for distress (β = −.30, p = .058) and well-being (β = .58, p = .038). Sensitivity adjustments produced p-values above .05 for all between-group comparisons.

          Discussion

          Feasible adjustments to implementation can improve program delivery to increase impact on maternal distress and well-being. Although results should be interpreted with caution, study design limitations are common in pragmatic, field-based research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE.

          Studies of coping in applied settings often confront the need to minimize time demands on participants. The problem of participant response burden is exacerbated further by the fact that these studies typically are designed to test multiple hypotheses with the same sample, a strategy that entails the use of many time-consuming measures. Such research would benefit from a brief measure of coping assessing several responses known to be relevant to effective and ineffective coping. This article presents such a brief form of a previously published measure called the COPE inventory (Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989), which has proven to be useful in health-related research. The Brief COPE omits two scales of the full COPE, reduces others to two items per scale, and adds one scale. Psychometric properties of the Brief COPE are reported, derived from a sample of adults participating in a study of the process of recovery after Hurricane Andrew.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.

            The first purpose of this review was to assess the impact of implementation on program outcomes, and the second purpose was to identify factors affecting the implementation process. Results from over quantitative 500 studies offered strong empirical support to the conclusion that the level of implementation affects the outcomes obtained in promotion and prevention programs. Findings from 81 additional reports indicate there are at least 23 contextual factors that influence implementation. The implementation process is affected by variables related to communities, providers and innovations, and aspects of the prevention delivery system (i.e., organizational functioning) and the prevention support system (i.e., training and technical assistance). The collection of implementation data is an essential feature of program evaluations, and more information is needed on which and how various factors influence implementation in different community settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Uncertainties continue about the roles that methodological factors and key risk factors, particularly torture and other potentially traumatic events (PTEs), play in the variation of reported prevalence rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression across epidemiologic surveys among postconflict populations worldwide. To undertake a systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence rates of PTSD and depression in the refugee and postconflict mental health field. An initial pool of 5904 articles, identified through MEDLINE, PsycINFO and PILOTS, of surveys involving refugee, conflict-affected populations, or both, published in English-language journals between 1980 and May 2009. Surveys were limited to those of adult populations (n > or = 50) reporting PTSD prevalence, depression prevalence, or both. Excluded surveys comprised patients, war veterans, and civilian populations (nonrefugees/asylum seekers) from high-income countries exposed to terrorist attacks or involved in distal conflicts (> or = 25 years). Methodological factors (response rate, sample size and design, diagnostic method) and substantive factors (sociodemographics, place of survey, torture and other PTEs, Political Terror Scale score, residency status, time since conflict). A total of 161 articles reporting results of 181 surveys comprising 81,866 refugees and other conflict-affected persons from 40 countries were identified. Rates of reported PTSD and depression showed large intersurvey variability (0%-99% and 3%-85.5%, respectively). The unadjusted weighted prevalence rate reported across all surveys for PTSD was 30.6% (95% CI, 26.3%-35.2%) and for depression was 30.8% (95% CI, 26.3%-35.6%). Methodological factors accounted for 12.9% and 27.7% PTSD and depression, respectively. Nonrandom sampling, small sample sizes, and self-report questionnaires were associated with higher rates of mental disorder. Adjusting for methodological factors, reported torture (Delta total R(2) between base methodological model and base model + substantive factor [DeltaR(2)] = 23.6%; OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.52-2.65) emerged as the strongest factor associated with PTSD, followed by cumulative exposure to PTEs (DeltaR(2) = 10.8%; OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.21-1.91), time since conflict (DeltaR(2) = 10%; OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.91), and assessed level of political terror (DeltaR(2) = 3.5%; OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03-2.50). For depression, significant factors were number of PTEs (DeltaR(2) = 22.0%; OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.39-1.93), time since conflict (DeltaR(2) = 21.9%; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93), reported torture (DeltaR(2) = 11.4%; OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.07-2.04), and residency status (DeltaR(2) = 5.0%; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07-1.57). Methodological factors and substantive population risk factors, such as exposure to torture and other PTEs, after adjusting for methodological factors account for higher rates of reported prevalence of PTSD and depression.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Glob Ment Health (Camb)
                Glob Ment Health (Camb)
                GMH
                Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                2054-4251
                2024
                07 May 2024
                : 11
                : e64
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Human Services, School of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, VA, USA
                [2 ]Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD, USA
                [3 ]Action Against Hunger , Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh
                [4 ]Action contre La Faim , Paris, France
                Community Health and Social Science, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy , United States
                Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , United States
                School of Government, Universidad de los Andes , Colombia
                Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Amanda J. Nguyen; Email: ajnguyen@ 123456virginia.edu

                A.J.N. and S.M.M. are co-first authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4288-3457
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3608-2418
                Article
                S205442512400058X
                10.1017/gmh.2024.58
                11140488
                bdde6f7a-94b3-4100-8600-e09130c4e48e
                © The Author(s) 2024

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 September 2023
                : 05 February 2024
                : 29 April 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, References: 43, Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: United States Agency for International Development, doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000200;
                Award ID: AID-OAA-A-17-00002
                Categories
                Research Article
                Community-based PSS interventions for displaced populations
                Interventions
                Individual Care
                Policy and Systems
                Services Integration
                Prevention
                Prevention
                Secondary Prevention
                Promotion

                psychosocial,mental health,maternal,infants,refugee,nutrition,rohingya,bangladesh

                Comments

                Comment on this article