Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Hydrocortisone vs Pasireotide on Pancreatic Surgery Complications in Patients With High Risk of Pancreatic Fistula : A Randomized Clinical Trial

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , MD, PhD 1 , , MD, PhD 1 , , MD, PhD 1 , 2 ,
      JAMA Surgery
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is hydrocortisone noninferior compared with pasireotide in reducing pancreatic surgery complications?

          Findings

          In this randomized clinical trial that included 126 patients undergoing partial pancreatectomy, the mean Comprehensive Complication Index score (a measurement of overall postoperative morbidity) was –6.16 points lower in patients receiving pasireotide and the lower limit of the 90% CI crossed the prespecified noninferiority margin (–9). In subgroup analyses of patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy, the mean Comprehensive Complication Index score was significantly lower (10.3 points) in the pasireotide vs hydrocortisone group.

          Meaning

          In this study, hydrocortisone is not noninferior compared with pasireotide, and pasireotide may be more effective in reducing postoperative complications in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Both hydrocortisone and pasireotide have been shown in randomized clinical trials to be effective in reducing postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery, but to date no randomized clinical trial has evaluated the effectiveness of pasireotide compared with hydrocortisone.

          Objective

          To assess the noninferiority of hydrocortisone compared with pasireotide in reducing complications after partial pancreatectomy.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          A noninferiority, parallel-group, individually randomized clinical trial was conducted at a single academic center between May 19, 2016, and December 17, 2018. Outcome collectors and analyzers were blinded. A total of 281 patients undergoing partial pancreatectomy were assessed for inclusion. Patients younger than 18 years, those allergic to hydrocortisone or pasireotide, patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with hard pancreas or dilated pancreatic duct, and patients not eventually undergoing partial pancreatectomy were excluded. Modified intention-to-treat analysis was used in determination of the results.

          Interventions

          Treatment included pasireotide, 900 μg, subcutaneously twice a day for 7 days or hydrocortisone, 100 mg, intravenously 3 times a day for 3 days.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcome was the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score within 30 days. The noninferiority limit was set to 9 CCI points.

          Results

          Of the 281 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.8 years) assessed for eligibility, 168 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.6 years) were randomized and 126 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analyses. Sixty-three patients received pasireotide (35 men [56%]; median [interquartile range] age, 64 [56-70] years) and 63 patients received hydrocortisone (25 men [40%]; median [interquartile range] age, 67 [56-73] years). The mean (SD) CCI score was 23.94 (17.06) in the pasireotide group and 30.11 (20.47) in the hydrocortisone group (mean difference, –6.16; 2-sided 90% CI, –11.73 to –0.60), indicating that hydrocortisone was not noninferior. Postoperative pancreatic fistula was detected in 34 patients (54%) in the pasireotide group and 39 patients (62%) in the hydrocortisone group (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.68-2.82; P = .37). One patient in the pasireotide group and 2 patients in the hydrocortisone group died within 30 days. In subgroup analyses of patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy, the CCI score was a mean of 10.3 points lower (mean [SD], 16.03 [11.94] vs 26.28 [21.76]; 2-sided 95% CI, −19.34 to −2.12; P = .03) and postoperative pancreatic fistula rate was lower (37% vs 67%; P = .02) in the pasireotide group compared with the hydrocortisone group.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this study, hydrocortisone was not noninferior compared with pasireotide in patients undergoing partial pancreatectomy. Pasireotide may be more effective than hydrocortisone in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02775227; EudraCT identifier: 2016-000212-16

          Abstract

          This randomized clinical trial evaluates the use of pasireotide vs hydrocortisone to reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Classification of Surgical Complications

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

            Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common complications after pancreatic resection. In the literature, the reported incidence of DGE after pancreatic surgery varies considerably between different surgical centers, primarily because an internationally accepted consensus definition of DGE is not available. Several surgical centers use a different definition of DGE. Hence, a valid comparison of different study reports and operative techniques is not possible. After a literature review on DGE after pancreatic resection, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) developed an objective and generally applicable definition with grades of DGE based primarily on severity and clinical impact. DGE represents the inability to return to a standard diet by the end of the first postoperative week and includes prolonged nasogastric intubation of the patient. Three different grades (A, B, and C) were defined based on the impact on the clinical course and on postoperative management. The proposed definition, which includes a clinical grading of DGE, should allow objective and accurate comparison of the results of future clinical trials and will facilitate the objective evaluation of novel interventions and surgical modalities in the field of pancreatic surgery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition.

              Postoperative hemorrhage is one of the most severe complications after pancreatic surgery. Due to the lack of an internationally accepted, universal definition of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), the incidences reported in the literature vary considerably, even in reports from randomized controlled trials. Because of these variations in the definition of what constitutes a PPH, the incidences of its occurrence are not comparable. The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) developed an objective, generally applicable definition of PPH based on a literature review and consensus clinical experience. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage is defined by 3 parameters: onset, location, and severity. The onset is either early ( 24 hours). The location is either intraluminal or extraluminal. The severity of bleeding may be either mild or severe. Three different grades of PPH (grades A, B, and C) are defined according to the time of onset, site of bleeding, severity, and clinical impact. An objective, universally accepted definition and clinical grading of PPH is important for the appropriate management and use of interventions in PPH. Such a definition also would allow comparisons of results from future clinical trials. Such standardized definitions are necessary to compare, in a nonpartisan manner, the outcomes of studies and the evaluation of novel operative treatment modalities in pancreatic surgery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Surg
                JAMA Surg
                JAMA Surg
                JAMA Surgery
                American Medical Association
                2168-6254
                2168-6262
                April 2020
                5 February 2020
                5 February 2020
                : 155
                : 4
                : 291-298
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
                [2 ]Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: November 30, 2019.
                Published Online: February 5, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6019
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Tarvainen T et al. JAMA Surgery.
                Corresponding Author: Ville Sallinen, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00029 Helsinki, Finland ( ville.sallinen@ 123456helsinki.fi ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Tarvainen and Sallinen had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Sirén, Kokkola, Sallinen.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Tarvainen, Kokkola, Sallinen.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Tarvainen, Kokkola, Sallinen.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Tarvainen, Sallinen.
                Obtained funding: Sallinen.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Sirén, Kokkola, Sallinen.
                Supervision: Kokkola, Sallinen.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Sallinen reported receiving grants from the Finnish Surgical Society, Finska Läkaresällskapet, and the Finnish Gastroenterological Society; lecturing fees from the City of Vantaa, Finnish Gastroenterological Society, Novartis, and the University of Helsinki; and nonfinancial support from Astellas outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: Funding for the study was provided through grants from Helsinki University Hospital (Dr Tarvainen) and Vatsatautien Tutkimussäätiö Foundation, Mary and Georg Ehrnrooth’s Foundation, Martti I. Turunen Foundation, and Helsinki University Hospital (Dr Sallinen).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 3.
                Additional Contributions: We thank study nurse Minna Manner, BS Healthcare (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital), for her help in the randomization process of this trial.
                Article
                soi190088
                10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6019
                7042940
                32022887
                bce8a67a-c937-42d2-accd-56ef918641fc
                Copyright 2020 Tarvainen T et al. JAMA Surgery.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 3 October 2019
                : 30 November 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Featured
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content432

                Cited by12

                Most referenced authors561