0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Chatbot for Social Need Screening and Resource Sharing With Vulnerable Families: Iterative Design and Evaluation Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Health outcomes are significantly influenced by unmet social needs. Although screening for social needs has become common in health care settings, there is often poor linkage to resources after needs are identified. The structural barriers (eg, staffing, time, and space) to helping address social needs could be overcome by a technology-based solution.

          Objective

          This study aims to present the design and evaluation of a chatbot, DAPHNE (Dialog-Based Assistant Platform for Healthcare and Needs Ecosystem), which screens for social needs and links patients and families to resources.

          Methods

          This research used a three-stage study approach: (1) an end-user survey to understand unmet needs and perception toward chatbots, (2) iterative design with interdisciplinary stakeholder groups, and (3) a feasibility and usability assessment. In study 1, a web-based survey was conducted with low-income US resident households (n=201). Following that, in study 2, web-based sessions were held with an interdisciplinary group of stakeholders (n=10) using thematic and content analysis to inform the chatbot’s design and development. Finally, in study 3, the assessment on feasibility and usability was completed via a mix of a web-based survey and focus group interviews following scenario-based usability testing with community health workers (family advocates; n=4) and social workers (n=9). We reported descriptive statistics and chi-square test results for the household survey. Content analysis and thematic analysis were used to analyze qualitative data. Usability score was descriptively reported.

          Results

          Among the survey participants, employed and younger individuals reported a higher likelihood of using a chatbot to address social needs, in contrast to the oldest age group. Regarding designing the chatbot, the stakeholders emphasized the importance of provider-technology collaboration, inclusive conversational design, and user education. The participants found that the chatbot’s capabilities met expectations and that the chatbot was easy to use (System Usability Scale score=72/100). However, there were common concerns about the accuracy of suggested resources, electronic health record integration, and trust with a chatbot.

          Conclusions

          Chatbots can provide personalized feedback for families to identify and meet social needs. Our study highlights the importance of user-centered iterative design and development of chatbots for social needs. Future research should examine the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and scalability of chatbot interventions to address social needs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How we design feasibility studies.

              Public health is moving toward the goal of implementing evidence-based interventions. To accomplish this, there is a need to select, adapt, and evaluate intervention studies. Such selection relies, in part, on making judgments about the feasibility of possible interventions and determining whether comprehensive and multilevel evaluations are justified. There exist few published standards and guides to aid these judgments. This article describes the diverse types of feasibility studies conducted in the field of cancer prevention, using a group of recently funded grants from the National Cancer Institute. The grants were submitted in response to a request for applications proposing research to identify feasible interventions for increasing the utilization of the Cancer Information Service among underserved populations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Hum Factors
                JMIR Hum Factors
                JMIR Human Factors
                JMIR Human Factors
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2292-9495
                2024
                19 July 2024
                : 11
                : e57114
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus, OH United States
                [2 ] Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University Sydney Australia
                [3 ] The Ohio State University Columbus, OH United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Emre Sezgin emre.sezgin@ 123456nationwidechildrens.org
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-9605
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8328-5317
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-8296
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6786-8128
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7827-1466
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3265-9902
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6586-1918
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5491-3997
                Article
                v11i1e57114
                10.2196/57114
                11297373
                39028995
                bc248dc2-5398-4f03-a68c-e72a73de4067
                ©Emre Sezgin, A Baki Kocaballi, Millie Dolce, Micah Skeens, Lisa Militello, Yungui Huang, Jack Stevens, Alex R Kemper. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 19.07.2024.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 5 February 2024
                : 29 March 2024
                : 3 May 2024
                : 24 May 2024
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                social determinants of health,social needs,chatbot,conversational agent,primary care,digital health,iterative design,implementation,evaluation,usability,feasibility

                Comments

                Comment on this article